Junhong Wu

Mr. Junhong Wu

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

1Year (2026-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 August 2026 in Drones
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JQJingjing Qian
Jingjing Qian
YCYang Cheng
Yang Cheng
JWJunhong Wu
Junhong Wu
BLBing Liu
Bing Liu
WDWei Dai
Wei Dai
Autonomous UAV landing in urban scenes requires a perception module that can identify candidate landing surfaces, reject structural and dynamic hazards, and express uncertainty before a downstream controller commits to a landing maneuver. This study reformulates UAV landing perception as a unified three-class landing-safety segmentation problem by relabeling UAVid, UDD6, and VDD into candidate landing area, structural obstacle, and critical hazard classes. The Landing3 dataset is constructed with an implementation-consistent relabeling protocol in which critical hazards override other labels and only sufficiently large connected components of source-specific candidate classes are retained as landing candidates. Two real-time segmentation models are evaluated under this unified task: PIDNet, a CNN-based multi-branch model with explicit boundary modeling, and SCTNet, a Transformer-guided model with semantic alignment for long-range context modeling. A post hoc conformal prediction (CP) module then converts softmax outputs into pixel-wise prediction sets, and the final candidate landing region is extracted only from pixels whose prediction set is the singleton candidate-landing class. Experiments compare the two models in terms of best validation mIoU, class-wise IoU, resolution-dependent accuracy–speed trade-offs, power-constrained FPS and complexity, qualitative candidate-area visualization, and CP-derived safe-area quality. A fixed-checkpoint sensitivity analysis further shows that the comparative model ranking remains stable across the tested connected-component threshold settings. SCTNet provides a lighter model and higher throughput under most tested resolutions and power limits, whereas PIDNet preserves higher safe-area recall, safe IoU, and spatial coherence after CP filtering. These results show that reliable UAV landing perception requires joint consideration of cross-dataset task definition, real-time model efficiency, and uncertainty-aware candidate-area extraction, rather than semantic segmentation accuracy alone.