Michael Schubert

Dr. Michael Schubert

Laboratoire de Biologie du Développement de Villefranche-sur-Mer (UMR 7009 — CNRS/Sorbonne Université), Institut de la Mer de Villefranche, 06230 Villefranche-sur-Mer, France
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 June 2008 in Genome Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LHLinda Z. Holland
Linda Z. Holland
Ricard AlbalatRicard Albalat
Ricard Albalat
KAKaoru Azumi
Kaoru Azumi
ÈBÈlia Benito-Gutiérrez
Èlia Benito-Gutiérrez
MBMatthew J. Blow
Matthew J. Blow
PHPeter W.H. Holland
Peter W.H. Holland
Cephalochordates, urochordates, and vertebrates evolved from a common ancestor over 520 million years ago. To improve our understanding of chordate evolution and the origin of vertebrates, we intensively searched for particular genes, gene families, and conserved noncoding elements in the sequenced genome of the cephalochordate Branchiostoma floridae, commonly called amphioxus or lancelets. Special attention was given to homeobox genes, opsin genes, genes involved in neural crest development, nuclear receptor genes, genes encoding components of the endocrine and immune systems, and conserved cis-regulatory enhancers. The amphioxus genome contains a basic set of chordate genes involved in development and cell signaling, including a fifteenth Hox gene. This set includes many genes that were co-opted in vertebrates for new roles in neural crest development and adaptive immunity. However, where amphioxus has a single gene, vertebrates often have two, three, or four paralogs derived from two whole-genome duplication events. In addition, several transcriptional enhancers are conserved between amphioxus and vertebrates—a very wide phylogenetic distance. In contrast, urochordate genomes have lost many genes, including a diversity of homeobox families and genes involved in steroid hormone function. The amphioxus genome also exhibits derived features, including duplications of opsins and genes proposed to function in innate immunity and endocrine systems. Our results indicate that the amphioxus genome is elemental to an understanding of the biology and evolution of nonchordate deuterostomes, invertebrate chordates, and vertebrates.

21 November 2018 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FMFerdinand Marlétaz
Ferdinand Marlétaz
PFPanos N. Firbas
Panos N. Firbas
IMIgnacio Maeso
Ignacio Maeso
JTJuan Tena
Juan Tena
OBOzren Bogdanovic
Ozren Bogdanovic
MIManuel Irimia
Manuel Irimia
Vertebrates have greatly elaborated the basic chordate body plan and evolved highly distinctive genomes that have been sculpted by two whole-genome duplications. Here we sequence the genome of the Mediterranean amphioxus (Branchiostoma lanceolatum) and characterize DNA methylation, chromatin accessibility, histone modifications and transcriptomes across multiple developmental stages and adult tissues to investigate the evolution of the regulation of the chordate genome. Comparisons with vertebrates identify an intermediate stage in the evolution of differentially methylated enhancers, and a high conservation of gene expression and its cis-regulatory logic between amphioxus and vertebrates that occurs maximally at an earlier mid-embryonic phylotypic period. We analyse regulatory evolution after whole-genome duplications, and find that—in vertebrates—over 80% of broadly expressed gene families with multiple paralogues derived from whole-genome duplications have members that restricted their ancestral expression, and underwent specialization rather than subfunctionalization. Counter-intuitively, paralogues that restricted their expression increased the complexity of their regulatory landscapes. These data pave the way for a better understanding of the regulatory principles that underlie key vertebrate innovations.

7 February 2010 in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MTMaria Theodosiou
Maria Theodosiou
VLVincent Laudet
Vincent Laudet
Michael SchubertMichael Schubert
Michael Schubert

1 January 2013 in EvoDevo
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LHLinda Z Holland
Linda Z Holland
JCJoão E Carvalho
João E Carvalho
HEHector Escriva
Hector Escriva
VLVincent Laudet
Vincent Laudet
Michael SchubertMichael Schubert
Michael Schubert
JYJr-Kai Yu
Jr-Kai Yu
The question of whether the ancestral bilaterian had a central nervous system (CNS) or a diffuse ectodermal nervous system has been hotly debated. Considerable evidence supports the theory that a CNS evolved just once. However, an alternative view proposes that the chordate CNS evolved from the ectodermal nerve net of a hemichordate-like ancestral deuterostome, implying independent evolution of the CNS in chordates and protostomes. To specify morphological divisions along the anterior/posterior axis, this ancestor used gene networks homologous to those patterning three organizing centers in the vertebrate brain: the anterior neural ridge, the zona limitans intrathalamica and the isthmic organizer, and subsequent evolution of the vertebrate brain involved elaboration of these ancestral signaling centers; however, all or part of these signaling centers were lost from the CNS of invertebrate chordates. The present review analyzes the evidence for and against these theories. The bulk of the evidence indicates that a CNS evolved just once – in the ancestral bilaterian. Importantly, in both protostomes and deuterostomes, the CNS represents a portion of a generally neurogenic ectoderm that is internalized and receives and integrates inputs from sensory cells in the remainder of the ectoderm. The expression patterns of genes involved in medio/lateral (dorso/ventral) patterning of the CNS are similar in protostomes and chordates; however, these genes are not similarly expressed in the ectoderm outside the CNS. Thus, their expression is a better criterion for CNS homologs than the expression of anterior/posterior patterning genes, many of which (for example, Hox genes) are similarly expressed both in the CNS and in the remainder of the ectoderm in many bilaterians. The evidence leaves hemichordates in an ambiguous position – either CNS centralization was lost to some extent at the base of the hemichordates, or even earlier, at the base of the hemichordates + echinoderms, or one of the two hemichordate nerve cords is homologous to the CNS of protostomes and chordates. In any event, the presence of part of the genetic machinery for the anterior neural ridge, the zona limitans intrathalamica and the isthmic organizer in invertebrate chordates together with similar morphology indicates that these organizers were present, at least in part, at the base of the chordates and were probably elaborated upon in the vertebrate lineage.

1 June 2007 in Developmental Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZKZbynek Kozmik
Zbynek Kozmik
NHNicholas D. Holland
Nicholas D. Holland
JKJana Kreslova
Jana Kreslova
DODiana Oliveri
Diana Oliveri
Michael SchubertMichael Schubert
Michael Schubert
Simona CandianiSimona Candiani
Simona Candiani

1 May 2006 in Trends in Ecology & Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Michael SchubertMichael Schubert
Michael Schubert
HEHector Escriva
Hector Escriva
JXJosé Xavier-Neto
José Xavier-Neto
VLVincent Laudet
Vincent Laudet