Marulasiddappa Suresh

Prof. Dr. Marulasiddappa Suresh

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

34Years (1993-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 December 1998 in Journal of Experimental Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AZAllan J. Zajac
Allan J. Zajac
JBJoseph N. Blattman
Joseph N. Blattman
KMKaja Murali-Krishna
Kaja Murali-Krishna
DSDavid J.D. Sourdive
David J.D. Sourdive
MSMarulasiddappa Suresh
Marulasiddappa Suresh
RARafi Ahmed
Rafi Ahmed
We examined the regulation of virus-specific CD8 T cell responses during chronic lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) infection of mice. Our study shows that within the same persistently infected host, different mechanisms can operate to silence antiviral T cell responses; CD8 T cells specific to one dominant viral epitope were deleted, whereas CD8 T cells responding to another dominant epitope persisted indefinitely. These virus-specific CD8 T cells expressed activation markers (CD69hi, CD44hi, CD62Llo) and proliferated in vivo but were unable to elaborate any antiviral effector functions. This unresponsive phenotype was more pronounced under conditions of CD4 T cell deficiency, highlighting the importance of CD8– CD4 T cell collaboration in controlling persistent infections. Importantly, in the presence of CD4 T cell help, adequate CD8 effector activity was maintained and the chronic viral infection eventually resolved. The persistence of activated virus-specific CD8 T cells without effector function reveals a novel mechanism for silencing antiviral immune responses and also offers new possibilities for enhancing CD8 T cell immunity in chronically infected hosts.

1 February 1998 in Immunity
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KMKaja Murali-Krishna
Kaja Murali-Krishna
JAJohn D Altman
John D Altman
MSMarulasiddappa Suresh
Marulasiddappa Suresh
DSDavid J.D Sourdive
David J.D Sourdive
AZAllan J Zajac
Allan J Zajac
RARafi Ahmed
Rafi Ahmed
Viral infections induce extensive T cell proliferation in vivo, but the specificity of the majority of the responding T cells has not been defined. To address this issue we used tetramers of MHC class I molecules containing viral peptides to directly visualize antigen-specific CD8 T cells during acute LCMV infection of mice. Based on tetramer binding and two sensitive assays measuring interferon-gamma production at the single-cell level, we found that 50%-70% of the activated CD8 T cells were LCMV specific [2 x 10(7) virus-specific cells/spleen]. Following viral clearance, antigen-specific CD8 T cell numbers dropped to 10(6) per spleen and were maintained at this level for the life of the mouse. Upon rechallenge with LCMV, there was rapid expansion of memory T cells, but after infection with the heterologous vaccinia virus there was no detectable change in the numbers of LCMV-specific memory CTL. Therefore, much of the CD8 T cell expansion seen during viral infection represents antigen-specific cells and warrants a revision of our current thinking on the size of the antiviral response.

13 July 2009 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YIYasushi Itoh
Yasushi Itoh
KSKyoko Shinya
Kyoko Shinya
MKMaki Kiso
Maki Kiso
TWTokiko Watanabe
Tokiko Watanabe
YSYoshihiro Sakoda
Yoshihiro Sakoda
YKYoshihiro Kawaoka
Yoshihiro Kawaoka
Analysis of a series of clinical isolates of the swine-origin H1N1 influenza virus reveals that in mammalian models (mice, ferrets and macaques) the current pandemic virus is associated with more severe disease than a seasonal H1N1 strain. The viruses can also infect pigs but do not cause clinical signs. All antivirus drugs tested, including Tamiflu, were effective in cell culture against the new virus, lending support to the use of these compounds as a first line of defence against the pandemic. On 11 June 2009 the World Health Organization declared that the infections caused by a new strain of influenza A virus closely related to swine viruses had reached pandemic levels. Here, one of the first US isolates of the new swine-origin H1N1 influenza virus (S-OIV) is characterized, as well as several other S-OIV isolates, both in vitro and in vivo. Influenza A viruses cause recurrent outbreaks at local or global scale with potentially severe consequences for human health and the global economy. Recently, a new strain of influenza A virus was detected that causes disease in and transmits among humans, probably owing to little or no pre-existing immunity to the new strain. On 11 June 2009 the World Health Organization declared that the infections caused by the new strain had reached pandemic proportion. Characterized as an influenza A virus of the H1N1 subtype, the genomic segments of the new strain were most closely related to swine viruses1. Most human infections with swine-origin H1N1 influenza viruses (S-OIVs) seem to be mild; however, a substantial number of hospitalized individuals do not have underlying health issues, attesting to the pathogenic potential of S-OIVs. To achieve a better assessment of the risk posed by the new virus, we characterized one of the first US S-OIV isolates, A/California/04/09 (H1N1; hereafter referred to as CA04), as well as several other S-OIV isolates, in vitro and in vivo. In mice and ferrets, CA04 and other S-OIV isolates tested replicate more efficiently than a currently circulating human H1N1 virus. In addition, CA04 replicates efficiently in non-human primates, causes more severe pathological lesions in the lungs of infected mice, ferrets and non-human primates than a currently circulating human H1N1 virus, and transmits among ferrets. In specific-pathogen-free miniature pigs, CA04 replicates without clinical symptoms. The assessment of human sera from different age groups suggests that infection with human H1N1 viruses antigenically closely related to viruses circulating in 1918 confers neutralizing antibody activity to CA04. Finally, we show that CA04 is sensitive to approved and experimental antiviral drugs, suggesting that these compounds could function as a first line of defence against the recently declared S-OIV pandemic.

1 October 2004 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DKDarwyn Kobasa
Darwyn Kobasa
ATAyato Takada
Ayato Takada
KSKyoko Shinya
Kyoko Shinya
MHMasato Hatta
Masato Hatta
PHPeter Halfmann
Peter Halfmann
YKYoshihiro Kawaoka
Yoshihiro Kawaoka

29 June 2011 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KWKevin B. Walsh
Kevin B. Walsh
JTJohn R. Teijaro
John R. Teijaro
PWPeter R. Wilker
Peter R. Wilker
AJAnna Jatzek
Anna Jatzek
DFDaniel M. Fremgen
Daniel M. Fremgen
Michael B.A. OldstoneMichael B.A. Oldstone
Michael B.A. Oldstone
Human pandemic H1N1 2009 influenza virus rapidly infected millions worldwide and was associated with significant mortality. Antiviral drugs that inhibit influenza virus replication are the primary therapy used to diminish disease; however, there are two significant limitations to their effective use: ( i ) antiviral drugs exert selective pressure on the virus, resulting in the generation of more fit viral progeny that are resistant to treatment; and ( ii ) antiviral drugs do not directly inhibit immune-mediated pulmonary injury that is a significant component of disease. Here we show that dampening the host's immune response against influenza virus using an immunomodulatory drug, AAL-R, provides significant protection from mortality (82%) over that of the neuraminidase inhibitor oseltamivir alone (50%). AAL-R combined with oseltamivir provided maximum protection against a lethal challenge of influenza virus (96%). Mechanistically, AAL-R inhibits cellular and cytokine/chemokine responses to limit immunopathologic damage, while maintaining host control of virus replication. With cytokine storm playing a role in the pathogenesis of a wide assortment of viral, bacterial, and immunologic diseases, a therapeutic approach using sphingosine analogs is of particular interest.

15 November 2001 in The Journal of Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MSMarulasiddappa Suresh
Marulasiddappa Suresh
JWJason Whitmire
Jason Whitmire
LHLaurie E Harrington
Laurie E Harrington
CLChristian P. Larsen
Christian P. Larsen
TPThomas C. Pearson
Thomas C. Pearson
RARafi Ahmed
Rafi Ahmed
Although the role of CD28-B7 interaction in the activation of naive T cells is well established, its importance in the generation and maintenance of T cell memory is not well understood. In this study, we examined the requirement for CD28-B7 interactions in primary T cell activation and immune memory. Ag-specific CD8 T cell responses were compared between wild-type (+/+) and CD28-deficient (CD28−/−) mice following an acute infection with lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV). During the primary response, there was a substantial activation and expansion of LCMV-specific CD8 T cells in both +/+ and CD28−/− mice. However, the magnitude of the primary CD8 T cell response to both dominant and subdominant LCMV CTL epitopes was ∼2- to 3-fold lower in CD28−/− mice compared with +/+ mice; the lack of CD28-mediated costimulation did not lead to preferential suppression of CD8 T cell responses to the weaker subdominant epitopes. As seen in CD28−/− mice, blockade of B7-mediated costimulation by CTLA4-Ig treatment of +/+ mice also resulted in a 2-fold reduction in the anti-LCMV CD8 T cell responses. Loss of CD28/B7 interactions did not significantly affect the generation and maintenance of CD8 T cell memory; the magnitude of CD8 T cell memory was ∼2-fold lower in CD28−/− mice as compared with +/+ mice. Further, in CD28−/− mice, LCMV-specific memory CD8 T cells showed normal homeostatic proliferation in vivo and also conferred protective immunity. Therefore, CD28 signaling is not necessary for the proliferative renewal and maintenance of memory CD8 T cells.