The inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are systemic conditions that affect not only the gastrointestinal tract but also other parts of the body. The presence of extraintestinal manifestations can significantly impact the quality of life in IBD patients. Peripheral arthritis, episcleritis, and erythema nodosum are frequently associated with active intestinal inflammation and often improve with standard treatment targeting intestinal inflammation. In contrast, anterior uveitis, ankylosing spondylitis, and primary sclerosing cholangitis typically occur independently of disease flares. The incidence of these conditions in individuals with IBD can reach up to 50% of patients over the course of their lifetime. In addition, some advanced therapies utilized for the treatment of IBD potentially result in side effects that may resemble extraintestinal manifestations. This review provides a thorough analysis of the pathophysiology and treatment of extraintestinal manifestations associated with Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis.

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) that negatively impacts patients’ quality of life. In the last decades, the therapeutic options available for the management of patients with moderate to severe UC have increased significantly, including not only biological drugs but also small molecules. However, there is a persistent need to develop new drugs that act on new targets while minimizing the risk of adverse events. Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) is a membrane-derived lysophospholipid. The S1P gradient between tissues and the circulatory system has a key role in regulating the trafficking of immune cells as autoreactive B and T lymphocytes. S1P receptor modulators could be a safe and efficacious alternative mechanism for reducing inflammation in immune-mediated disorders, including UC, by reducing lymphocyte egress from the lymph nodes to the bloodstream. Several S1P receptor modulators have been developed and tested in UC. Ozanimod is already approved by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medical Agency (EMA), while etrasimod and VTX002 are still under approval. Oral administration route, rapidity and reliable safety profile are the main advantages of this class of drugs. The aim of this review is to summarize the available evidence for the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of ozanimod, etrasimod, and VTX002 in UC.

In recent years, there has been a growing focus on the intricate interplay between the gut microbiota and host health, specifically in the context of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). The gut microbiota produces a diverse array of metabolites, influencing the host’s immune response and tissue homeostasis. Noteworthy metabolites, such as short-chain fatty acids, bile acids, and indoles, exert significant effects on intestinal inflammation and fibrosis. This review integrates current research findings to clarify the mechanisms through which gut microbiota metabolites contribute to the progression of IBD and fibrosis, offering insights into potential therapeutic targets and strategies for managing these intricate gastrointestinal conditions. The unraveling of the complex relationship between gut microbiota metabolites and inflammatory processes holds promise for the development of targeted interventions that could lead to more effective and personalized treatment approaches for individuals affected by IBD and subsequent intestinal fibrosis.

Crohn’s disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) that frequently affects the small bowel. Individuals diagnosed with CD are at increased risk of developing bowel cancer compared to the general population. Small bowel cancer is a rare but significant CD complication. Adenocarcinoma represents the most prevalent of these neoplasms, followed by neuroendocrine tumors and sarcomas. The primary risk factors identified are being of the male sex, disease duration, previous surgical intervention, perianal disease, and chronic inflammation. The precise etiology remains unclear. Another crucial issue concerns the role of immunomodulators and advanced therapies. By inhibiting inflammation, these therapies can reduce the risk of cancer, which is often initiated by the inflammation–dysplasia–adenocarcinoma sequence. In accordance with the most recent guidelines, it is not necessary to conduct surveillance in patients with small bowel cancer among CD patients, as it is considered a rare disease. Nevertheless, it is of significant importance for gastroenterologists to be aware of this potential CD complication, as well as the patients who are most at risk of developing it. The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of CD-SBC, focusing on epidemiology, etiopathogenesis, risk factors, diagnosis, and the role of advanced therapies in CD-SBC.

Janus kinase inhibitors, including tofacitinib, filgotinib, and upadacitinib, have emerged as effective therapeutic options for the management of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). By targeting the JAK-STAT signaling pathway, these agents modulate immune responses and reduce inflammation. However, concerns regarding the potential risk of malignancy associated with their use have gained significant attention. The JAK-STAT pathway is not only critical for inflammatory signaling but also plays a pivotal role in cellular growth, differentiation, and tumor surveillance. Observational studies and clinical trial data in rheumatoid arthritis have reported malignancies, including non-melanoma skin cancer and solid tumors, in patients receiving JAK inhibitors, with evidence suggesting variable risks depending on the selectivity of the agent. Current evidence does not suggest an increased risk of oncogenesis in patients with IBDs. Balancing therapeutic efficacy with long-term safety requires ongoing vigilance; patient stratification based on risk factors; and tailored monitoring strategies to mitigate potential adverse effects, including malignancies, during JAK inhibitor therapy. Long-term follow-up data of up to 10 years offer reassuring evidence that JAK inhibitor therapy in IBD patients does not confer an increased risk of malignancies, supporting their continued use within appropriate clinical settings.