Antonio Candeliere-Merlicco Antonio Candeliere-Merlicco

Dr. Antonio Candeliere-Merlicco Antonio Candeliere-Merlicco

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 July 2018 in Acta Neurologica Scandinavica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ACAntonio Candeliere-Merlicco Antonio Candeliere-Merlicco
Antonio Candeliere-Merlicco Antonio Candeliere-Merlicco
LTL. Gabaldón Torres
L. Gabaldón Torres
RGR. Villaverde González
R. Villaverde González
IRI. Fernández Romero
I. Fernández Romero
ECE. Aparicio Castro
E. Aparicio Castro
MAM. C. Lastres Arias
M. C. Lastres Arias

1 September 2016 in Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ACAntonio Candeliere-Merlicco Antonio Candeliere-Merlicco
Antonio Candeliere-Merlicco Antonio Candeliere-Merlicco
FVFrancisco Valero-Delgado
Francisco Valero-Delgado
SMSalvadora Martínez-Vidal
Salvadora Martínez-Vidal
MLMaría del Carmen Lastres-Arias
María del Carmen Lastres-Arias
EAEladio Aparicio-Castro
Eladio Aparicio-Castro
RVRamón Villaverde-González
Ramón Villaverde-González

1 January 2024 in Revista De Neurologia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Eladio Aparicio CastroEladio Aparicio Castro
Eladio Aparicio Castro
ACAntonio Candeliere-Merlicco Antonio Candeliere-Merlicco
Antonio Candeliere-Merlicco Antonio Candeliere-Merlicco
CSCarmen María Santa
Carmen María Santa
RGRamón Villaverde González
Ramón Villaverde González
Introduction. Depression is one of the most prevalent psychiatric conditions in adulthood, reaching figures of around 20%. The methodologies used to study depression are varied, and range from a self-administered test to structured psychiatric assessment. Several studies of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) have been conducted in the last 20 years, and figures of around 35% have been found for depressive symptoms, while depressive disorders are less frequent, at approximately 21%. Aims. The aim of this study is to evaluate the usefulness of patient self-reported scales such as the Beck depression inventory (BDI) for identifying depressive symptoms in patients with MS, and to analyse their correlation with the diagnosis of clinical depression or depressive disorder using the psychiatric clinical interview based on the criteria of the Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fifth edition. Patients and methods. This is a multicentre descriptive cross-sectional study of patients with MS and depressive symptoms. The BDI and the Hamilton depression rating scale (HDRS) were used, and the patients with the highest scores underwent psychiatric assessment. Results. A total of 191 patients were included; 81 of these (40.5%) had depressive symptomatology in the pathological range according to the BDI (cut-off point of 14), and 20 had a severe score (above 28). Nineteen patients with severe depressive symptoms according to both scales were selected and finally evaluated by a psychiatrist, who also assessed five patients who according to the neurologist had severe depressive symptoms despite a BDI score of almost 28, but did not reach that level. The suspected major depressive disorder was confirmed in only four (21%) cases with BDI scores indicative of severe symptoms. There is no correlation between the severity score as evidenced by the BDI and the psychiatric assessment. A major depressive disorder was diagnosed in 16 (66.6%) of the 24 patients with BDI > 26 evaluated by psychiatry. A score above 26 on the BDI enables identification of 75% of cases of depressive disorder without subtyping. The correlation between the HDRS and the BDI was statistically significant (r = 0.8; p < 0). Conclusions. The BDI is a useful screening test for identifying patients with depressive symptoms; in specific terms, a score above 26 is probably indicative of a depressive disorder that may benefit from psychiatric assessment.

18 April 2024 in Multiple Sclerosis Journal – Experimental, Translational and Clinical
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JSJulia Sabin
Julia Sabin
ESElisa Salas
Elisa Salas
JMJesús Martín-Martínez
Jesús Martín-Martínez
ACAntonio Candeliere-Merlicco Antonio Candeliere-Merlicco
Antonio Candeliere-Merlicco Antonio Candeliere-Merlicco
FBFrancisco Javier Barrero
Francisco Javier Barrero
JBJavier Ballesteros
Javier Ballesteros
A multicenter study involving 204 adults with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) assessed the dimensionality and item characteristics of the Mishel-Uncertainty of Illness Scale (MUIS), a generic self-assessment tool. Mokken analysis identified two dimensions in the MUIS with an appropriate item and overall scale scalability after excluding nonclassifiable items. A refined 12-item MUIS, employing a grade response model, effectively discriminated uncertainty levels among RRMS patients (likelihood ratio test p-value = .03). These findings suggest the potential value of the 12-item MUIS as a reliable measure for assessing uncertainty associated with the course of illness in RRMS.

1 June 2024 in Patient Preference and Adherence
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JSJulia Sabin
Julia Sabin
ESElisa Salas
Elisa Salas
JMJesús Martín-Martínez
Jesús Martín-Martínez
ACAntonio Candeliere-Merlicco Antonio Candeliere-Merlicco
Antonio Candeliere-Merlicco Antonio Candeliere-Merlicco
FHFrancisco Javier Barrero Hernández
Francisco Javier Barrero Hernández
JMJorge Maurino
Jorge Maurino
Purpose: Shared decision-making is critical in multiple sclerosis (MS) due to the uncertainty of the disease trajectory over time and the large number of treatment options with differing efficacy, safety and administration characteristics. The aim of this study was to assess patients’ decisional conflict regarding the choice of a disease-modifying therapy and its associated factors in patients with mid-stage relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Methods: A multicenter, non-interventional study was conducted. Adult patients with a diagnosis of RRMS (2017 revised McDonald criteria) and disease duration of 3 to 8 years were included. The level of uncertainty experienced by a patient when faced with making a treatment choice was assessed using the 4-item Decisional Conflict Scale. A battery of patient-reported and clinician-rated measures was administered to obtain information on symptom severity, illness perception, illness-related uncertainty, regret, MS knowledge, risk taking behavior, preferred role in the decision-making process, cognition, and self-management. Patients were recruited during routine follow-up visits and completed all questionnaires online using electronic tablets at the hospital. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted. Results: A total of 201 patients were studied. Mean age (Standard deviation) was 38.7 (8.4) years and 74.1% were female. Median disease duration (Interquartile range) was 6.0 (4.0– 7.0) years. Median EDSS score was 1.0 (0– 2.0). Sixty-seven (33.3%) patients reported a decisional conflict. These patients had lower MS knowledge and more illness uncertainty, anxiety, depressive symptoms, fatigue, subjective symptom severity, a threatening illness perception, and poorer quality of life than their counterparts. Lack of decisional conflict was associated with MS knowledge (Odds ratio [OR]=1.195, 95% CI 1.045, 1.383, p=0.013), self-management (OR=1.049, 95% CI 1.013, 1.093, p=0.018), and regret after a healthcare decision (OR=0.860, 95% CI 0.756, 0.973, p=0.018) in the multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Decisional conflict regarding the selection of a disease-modifying therapy was a common phenomenon in patients with mid-stage RRMS. Identifying factors associated with decisional conflict may be useful to implement preventive strategies that help patients better understand their condition and strengthen their self-management resources.

1 January 2023 in Revista De Neurologia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ACAntonio Candeliere-Merlicco Antonio Candeliere-Merlicco
Antonio Candeliere-Merlicco Antonio Candeliere-Merlicco
RGRamón Villaverde González
Ramón Villaverde González
PPPaloma Victoria Hidalgo Pérez
Paloma Victoria Hidalgo Pérez
FAFabio Hugo Escobar Arias
Fabio Hugo Escobar Arias
ECEladio Aparicio Castro
Eladio Aparicio Castro
MAMaría del Carmen Lastres Arias
María del Carmen Lastres Arias
Introduction. Wells syndrome, also known as eosinophilic cellulitis, is a rare dermatosis with approximately 200 cases previously described in the literature. Here, we present a case of a patient with multiple sclerosis with Wells syndrome induced by dimethyl fumarate (DMF). Case report. A 41-year-old Caucasian woman was treated with DMF in July 2021. One week later, she experienced itching on her upper and lower right arm, followed by the appearance of erythematous plaques covered with vesicles. The complete blood count showed an increased eosinophil count of up to 2,000 mu L. The histological images demonstrated dermal eosinophil infiltration concordant with Wells syndrome. The clinical course was benign, with complete resolution of the lesions and normalization of the eosinophil count within four weeks. Administration of corticosteroids was not necessary. Conclusions. Eosinophilia is rare in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with DMF and usually does not require dosage adjustments. Although clinical manifestations of eosinophilia in these patients are very rare, it is important for practitioners to recognize the symptoms. Many neuroleptic drugs can induce eosinophilia and systemic symptoms; therefore, physicians must be aware of the risks associated with DMF and neuroleptic drugs, particularly for quetiapine, which contains fumarate.