Societies need to develop more sustainable ways of living, working, and doing business. Education for sustainable development (ESD) plays a pivotal role in this endeavor. The aim is to provide people with the necessary knowledge, values, and skills for the needed transformation. Therefore, organizations of adult and continuing education must address issues of climate protection and sustainability in their programs and act accordingly in the way the organization is managed. This article reports on a qualitative study that involves leaders of adult education institutions in China, Germany, and the USA. This study seeks to investigate what these leaders do and how they act to implement ESD in their organizations. It specifically looks at current challenges, management strategies, beliefs, and values of the leaders. The results of this study show that leaders of adult and continuing education organizations recognize the need to address sustainability in adult education. However, they face many challenges in implementing ESD, including a lack of resources (e.g., finances and staff), structural barriers, and difficulties in reaching new target groups. Despite these challenges, many participants strive to develop their organizations in a more sustainable way, such as through curriculum design and campus management. Some leaders take a comprehensive approach, guided by the Whole Institution Approach, by integrating ESD into their institution’s vision and mission, establishing dedicated working groups, and forming new partnerships with external stakeholders. Overall, this study highlights the crucial role of leadership in advancing sustainability efforts.

Understanding student artificial intelligence (AI) literacy in the context of higher education is crucial as technology advances and AI use increases. The purpose of this study is to better understand how university students perceive, define, and apply AI literacy within their own educational experiences and from their own disciplinary lens. Collecting electronic survey responses from 130 graduate and undergraduate students across several disciplines including First-Year Writing, Communication Studies, and Education, this study attempts to elucidate how students articulate and perceive their own degree of AI literacy—Access, Understanding, Critical Thinking, Application, and Ethics—in the educational context. Overall, students reported infrequent use, using ChatGPT most often. Education students reported a lower understanding of AI than non-education students. Undergraduates reported higher rates within ethics than graduate students. No significant differences in AI literacy were found between students who were or were not first-generation students, students who did or did not receive financial aid, or by gender. Students reporting higher rates of use also reported higher rates of AI literacy. Crucially, this study provides key qualitative and quantitative insights exploring how students perceive their own AI literacy. Understanding the current state of students’ AI literacy is important to facilitating holistic student success in academic environments and career readiness as institutions of higher education adapt and prepare curricula, programs, and interventions addressing AI literacy across disciplines.

This study examined the psychometric properties of two new assessment measures, which consist of developmental progressions of pre‐school children in literacy skills and mathematics skills respectively. Researchers gathered data to measure the extent of children's engagement with an educational gaming system and the skill levels they attained within the system. Additionally, teachers rated the children's developmental status using rating scales focused on literacy and mathematics skills. Rasch analysis was employed to examine the unidimensionality, item difficulty, reliability, and rating scale category effectiveness of the items. The initial reliability and validity statistics offer evidence that supports the usefulness of the information the measures can provide as a source of indicators of child developmental status from the perspective of teachers.