Dincer Goksuluk

Dr. Dincer Goksuluk

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2014 in The R Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SKSelcuk Korkmaz
Selcuk Korkmaz
DGDincer Goksuluk
Dincer Goksuluk
GZGokmen Zararsiz
Gokmen Zararsiz

1 January 2016 in The R Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DGDincer Goksuluk
Dincer Goksuluk
SKSelcuk Korkmaz
Selcuk Korkmaz
GZGokmen Zararsiz
Gokmen Zararsiz
EAErgun Karaagaoglu A.
Ergun Karaagaoglu A.

1 November 2014 in Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SKSelcuk Korkmaz
Selcuk Korkmaz
GZGokmen Zararsiz
Gokmen Zararsiz
DGDincer Goksuluk
Dincer Goksuluk

1 July 2019 in Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DGDincer Goksuluk
Dincer Goksuluk
GZGokmen Zararsiz
Gokmen Zararsiz
SKSelcuk Korkmaz
Selcuk Korkmaz
VEVahap Eldem
Vahap Eldem
GZGozde Erturk Zararsiz
Gozde Erturk Zararsiz
AKAhmet Ergun Karaagaoglu
Ahmet Ergun Karaagaoglu

30 April 2015 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SKSelcuk Korkmaz
Selcuk Korkmaz
GZGokmen Zararsiz
Gokmen Zararsiz
DGDincer Goksuluk
Dincer Goksuluk
Virtual screening is an important step in early-phase of drug discovery process. Since there are thousands of compounds, this step should be both fast and effective in order to distinguish drug-like and nondrug-like molecules. Statistical machine learning methods are widely used in drug discovery studies for classification purpose. Here, we aim to develop a new tool, which can classify molecules as drug-like and nondrug-like based on various machine learning methods, including discriminant, tree-based, kernel-based, ensemble and other algorithms. To construct this tool, first, performances of twenty-three different machine learning algorithms are compared by ten different measures, then, ten best performing algorithms have been selected based on principal component and hierarchical cluster analysis results. Besides classification, this application has also ability to create heat map and dendrogram for visual inspection of the molecules through hierarchical cluster analysis. Moreover, users can connect the PubChem database to download molecular information and to create two-dimensional structures of compounds. This application is freely available through www.biosoft.hacettepe.edu.tr/MLViS/.

23 August 2017 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GZGokmen Zararsiz
Gokmen Zararsiz
DGDincer Goksuluk
Dincer Goksuluk
SKSelcuk Korkmaz
Selcuk Korkmaz
VEVahap Eldem
Vahap Eldem
GZGozde Erturk Zararsiz
Gozde Erturk Zararsiz
AOAhmet Ozturk
Ahmet Ozturk
RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) is a powerful technique for the gene-expression profiling of organisms that uses the capabilities of next-generation sequencing technologies. Developing gene-expression-based classification algorithms is an emerging powerful method for diagnosis, disease classification and monitoring at molecular level, as well as providing potential markers of diseases. Most of the statistical methods proposed for the classification of gene-expression data are either based on a continuous scale (eg. microarray data) or require a normal distribution assumption. Hence, these methods cannot be directly applied to RNA-Seq data since they violate both data structure and distributional assumptions. However, it is possible to apply these algorithms with appropriate modifications to RNA-Seq data. One way is to develop count-based classifiers, such as Poisson linear discriminant analysis and negative binomial linear discriminant analysis. Another way is to bring the data closer to microarrays and apply microarray-based classifiers. In this study, we compared several classifiers including PLDA with and without power transformation, NBLDA, single SVM, bagging SVM (bagSVM), classification and regression trees (CART), and random forests (RF). We also examined the effect of several parameters such as overdispersion, sample size, number of genes, number of classes, differential-expression rate, and the transformation method on model performances. A comprehensive simulation study is conducted and the results are compared with the results of two miRNA and two mRNA experimental datasets. The results revealed that increasing the sample size, differential-expression rate and decreasing the dispersion parameter and number of groups lead to an increase in classification accuracy. Similar with differential-expression studies, the classification of RNA-Seq data requires careful attention when handling data overdispersion. We conclude that, as a count-based classifier, the power transformed PLDA and, as a microarray-based classifier, vst or rlog transformed RF and SVM classifiers may be a good choice for classification. An R/BIOCONDUCTOR package, MLSeq, is freely available at https://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/MLSeq.html.