The commensal consortium of the gut microbiome is associated with favorable responses to anti-programmed death protein 1 (PD-1) therapy in thoracic neoplasms

Background: The aim of the study was to define the clinical significance of circulating tumor cells (CTCs)/circulating tumor endothelial cells (CTECs) and their subtypes in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients.Methods: CTCs/CTECs and their subtypes were determined using SE‐iFISH technology in 33 SCLC patients before initial treatment (B1), after two cycles of chemotherapy (B2), at the completion of chemotherapy (B3), and disease progression (B4). The correlations with clinical characteristics, progression‐free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed.Results: CTCs and CTECs were detected in 96.6% and 65.5% of patients, respectively. Patients had higher levels of CTCs compared with CTECs in circulation (p < 0.05). Extensive‐stage SCLC patients tended to have higher CTEC counts (p = 0.035), and the detection of CTC‐white blood cell (CTC‐WBC) clusters was associated with a worse response to treatment (p = 0.030). Patients with CTC‐WBC clusters at B1 (17.3 vs. 22.6 months, p = 0.041) and B2 (19.9 vs. 25.2 months, p = 0.018) had significantly shorter OS than those with no detection. Additionally, their presence was revealed as independent predictors for a worse OS in multivariable analyses (B1: HR 9.3, 95% CI: 1.4–48, p = 0.0079; B2: HR 4.4, 95% CI: 1.1–18, p = 0.041). A high CTC level at B4 was an adverse prognostic factor for SCLC patients (PFS: 8.7 vs. 22.5 months, p = 0.0026; OS: 19 months vs. not reached, p = 0.0086). CTC clusters and CTECs also showed prognostic values.Conclusions: The presence of CTC‐WBC clusters at baseline and after two‐cycle chemotherapy and the total CTC counts at the completion of chemotherapy are strong predictors for the prognostic survival of SCLC patients receiving first‐line treatment.

Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have improved the prognosis of mutant lung cancer; however, the clinical application value of TKIs for nonclassical EGFR mutation is unclear, especially for patients with rare uncommon mutations.Methods: A retrospective study based on electronic medical records was conducted to collect data on the effectiveness of afatinib in patients with stage IIIB/IV lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) bearing uncommon mutations between January 2017 and January 2021.Results: Forty‐two patients with uncommon mutations treated with afatinib were enrolled. The objective response rate (ORR) was 50.0% (10 of 20 patients). The median time to treatment failure (TTF) was 11.7 months (95% confidence interval = 8.5–18.3 months). Of the 42 patients, the median TTF was 15.0, 11.7, and 16.6 months in patients with Gly719Xaa (G719X), Ser768Ile (S768I), and Leu861Gln (L861Q) mutations, respectively. In patients with the rare uncommon mutation, the median TTF was 10.0 months, and the ORR was 50.0%. Afatinib demonstrated clinical activity across a set type of specific rare uncommon mutations, including EGFR L747P, A767_V769dup, and L833V/H835L, with a case having a TTF of more than 1 year. Molecular profiling reports of 16 afatinib‐resistant biopsy samples were available, and the secondary T790M mutation was detected in one patient with L833V/H835L mutation and one harboring S768I/L858R mutation.Conclusions: Our findings suggested that afatinib is effective in patients with uncommon mutations. Mechanisms of afatinib resistance vary and need further investigation.

(1) Background: Afatinib has been approved for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) carrying major uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR) mutations. Dacomitinib, another second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has also shown promising potential for uncommon EGFR mutations. However, no comparative study has been conducted. (2) Methods: Two cohorts were employed: the AFANDA cohort, an ambispective cohort including 121 patients with uncommon EGFR mutations admitted to two tertiary hospitals in China, and an external validation afatinib cohort (ex-AC), extracted from the Afatinib Uncommon EGFR Mutations Database (N = 1140). The AFANDA cohort was divided into an afatinib cohort (AC) and a dacomitinib cohort (DC) for internal exploration. Objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events (AEs) were assessed for comparison. Progression patterns and resistance mechanisms were explored. (3) Results: In total, 286 patients with advanced NSCLC carrying uncommon EGFR mutations treated with afatinib or dacomitinib were enrolled, including 79 in the AFANDA cohort (44 in the DC, 35 in the AC) and 207 in the ex-AC. In internal exploration, the ORR of the DC was significantly higher than that of the AC (60.5 vs. 26.7%, p = 0.008), but there was no significant difference in median PFS between the DC and the AC (12.0 months vs. 10.0 months, p = 0.305). Multivariate analysis confirmed an independent favorable effect of dacomitinib on PFS (hazard ratio (HR), 1.909; p = 0.047). In external validation, multivariate analysis confirmed the independent prognostic role of dacomitinib in PFS (HR, 1.953; p = 0.029). Propensity score matching analysis confirmed the superiority of dacomitinib over afatinib in terms of PFS in both univariate and multivariate analyses. Toxicity profiling analysis suggested more G1 (p = 0.006), but fewer G3 (p = 0.036) AEs in the DC than in the AC. Progression patterns revealed that the incidence of intracranial progression in the AC was significantly higher than that in the DC (50 vs. 21.1%, p = 0.002). Drug resistance analysis indicated no significant difference in the occurrence of T790M between the AC and the DC (11.8 vs. 15.4%, p = 0.772). (4) Conclusions: Compared with afatinib, dacomitinib demonstrated a more favorable activity with manageable toxicity and different progression patterns in patients with NSCLC carrying uncommon EGFR mutations.

Background: The aim of the study was to explore the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) rechallenge in patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Methods: Studies that enrolled NSCLC patients treated with two lines of ICIs were included using four databases. The initial line (1L‐) and subsequent lines (2L‐) of ICIs were defined as 1L‐ICI and 2L‐ICI, respectively.Results: A total of 17 studies involving 2100 patients were included. The pooled objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), median progression‐free survival (mPFS), and median overall survival (mOS) for 2L‐ICIs were 10%, 50%, 3.0 months, and 13.1 months, respectively. The 2L‐ICI discontinuation rates caused by toxicities ranged from 0% to 23.5%. Original data were extracted from six studies, covering 89 patients. Patients in whom 1L‐ICIs were discontinued following clinical decision (the mPFS of 2L‐ICIs was not reach) achieved a more prolonged mPFS of 2L‐ICIs than those due to toxicity (5.2 months) and progressive disease (2.1 months) (p < 0.0001). Patients' 1L‐PFS for more than 2‐years had preferable 2L‐ORR (35.0% vs. 9.8%, p = 0.03), 2L‐DCR (85.0% vs. 49.0%, p = 0.007), and 2L‐mPFS (12.4 vs. 3.0 months, p < 0.0001) than those less than 1‐year. Patients administered the same drugs achieved a significantly prolonged mPFS compared with the remaining patients (5.4 vs. 2.3 months, p = 0.0004), and those who did not accept antitumor treatments during the intervals of two lines of ICIs achieved a prolonged mPFS compared to those patients who did accept treatments (7.6 vs. 1.9 months, p < 0.0001).Conclusions: ICI rechallenge is a useful therapeutic strategy for NSCLC patients, especially suitable for those who achieve long‐term tumor remission for more than 2‐years under 1L‐ICIs.