Wide-awake, local anesthesia, no tourniquet (WALANT) is a technique that removes the requirement for operations to be performed with a tourniquet, general/regional anesthesia, sedation or an anesthetist. We reviewed the WALANT literature with respect to the diverse indications and impact of WALANT to discuss the importance of future surgical curriculum integration. With appropriate patient selection, WALANT may be used effectively in upper and lower limb surgery; it is also a useful option for patients who are unsuitable for general/regional anesthesia. There is a growing body of evidence supporting the use of WALANT in more complex operations in both upper and lower limb surgery. WALANT is a safe, effective, and simple technique associated with equivalent or superior patient pain scores among other numerous clinical and cost benefits. Cost benefits derive from reduced requirements for theater/anesthetic personnel, space, equipment, time, and inpatient stay. The lack of a requirement for general anesthesia reduces aerosol generating procedures, for example, intubation/high-flow oxygen, hence patients and staff also benefit from the reduced potential for infection transmission. WALANT provides a relatively, but not entirely, bloodless surgical field. Training requirements include the surgical indications, volume calculations, infiltration technique, appropriate perioperative patient/team member communication, and specifics of each operation that need to be considered, for example, checking of active tendon glide versus venting of flexor tendon pulleys. WALANT offers significant clinical, economic, and operative safety advantages when compared with general/regional anesthesia. Key challenges include careful patient selection and the comprehensive training of future surgeons to perform the technique safely.

Implantable pulse generator site pain is prevalent in 4 to 12 percent of patients with the spinal cord stimulators. We have used a case series of 4 patients aged 46 to 79, to demonstrate pain relief at the implant site via the use of autologous fat grafting. All patients experienced an improvement of 33.3 % to 75 % in pain scores within a few weeks of the procedure. Up to a 21 month follow up date, there was still pain relief with no complications. Subsequently, we propose that autologous fat grafting may be effective and safe in pain management at the implant pulse generator sites. Further studies with larger case series and long term follow up is needed for validation.

Congenital pseudoarthrosis of the tibia (CPT) is a rare pathological disease associated with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). It presents with tibial bowing and can progress into a nonhealing fracture. Treatment options include conservative approaches such as serial bracing or various surgical options. Surgically, the aims are to achieve long-term bone union, prevent limb length discrepancies (LLDs), and avoid mechanical axis deviation, soft tissue lesions, nearby joint stiffness, and pathological fracture. The purpose of our study is to highlight our experience with both the conservative approach and the use of vascularized free fibula reconstruction of these deformities, including the challenges encountered with a long-term follow-up until skeletal maturity. We present a retrospective analysis of a total of nine (9) patients consisting of three (3) girls and six (6) boys. Six (6) children were treated with a vascularized fibula flap, and the other three (3) were treated conservatively. Outcomes measured included fractures, LLD, ankle valgus deformity, donor site morbidity, and number of surgical corrections. All patients had flap survival. Three (3) of six children had a previous failed surgery with intramedullary nail and bone graft prior to performing a vascularized free fibula reconstruction. The follow-up period ranged from 8 months to 200 months. The complications included stress fractures (50%), LLD (66.6%), and ankle valgus (33.3%). During growth phases, these children required multiple corrective surgeries. Fibula free flap is a good treatment option for CPT even in patients with prior surgical failures with variable results. Level of Evidence - Level 4 - Case series Therapeutic Studies—Investigating the Results of Treatment.