Background Delayed graft function (DGF) caused by ischemia/reperfusion injury (I/RI) negatively influences the outcome of kidney transplantation. This prospective single-center study characterized the intrarenal transcriptome during I/RI as a means of identifying genes associated with DGF development. Methods Characterization of the intrarenal transcription profile associated with I/RI was carried out on three sequential graft biopsies from respective allografts before and during transplantation. The intragraft expression of 92 candidate genes was measured using quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (2^−ΔΔCt) in delayed (n=9) and primary function allografts (n=26). Results Cold storage was not associated with significant changes to the expression profile of the target gene transcripts; however, up-regulation of 16 genes associated with enhanced activation of innate and adaptive immune responses and apoptosis was observed after reperfusion. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that higher tubular atrophy scores (ct) together with a lower expression of Netrin-1 might predict DGF development (training area under the receiver operating curve=0.89, cross-validated area under the receiver operating curve=0.81). Conclusions Poor baseline tubular cell quality (defined by a higher rate of tubular atrophy) combined with the reduced potential of apoptotic survival factors represented by decreased Netrin-1 gene expression were associated with delayed kidney graft function.

One of the three commercially available cyanoacrylate venous glues used for the treatment of saphenous vein insufficiency is the VariClose® vein sealing system. Previous studies have documented a high rate of occlusion and minimal postoperative complications. The aim of this study was to compare occlusion rates and clinical outcomes of endovenous laser treatment with the VariClose® vein sealing system in the treatment of truncal vein insufficiency. Retrospective non-randomized single center study with prospectively collected data comparing endovenous laser treatment and VariClose® procedures between April 2018 and November 2019. VariClose® was used in 27 patients (30 veins) and endovenous laser treatment in 42 patients (51 veins). The occlusion rate at one, three, and six months were 96%, 85%, and 65% for VariClose® procedures and 100%, 100%, and 97% for endovenous laser treatment procedures (p = 0.01), respectively. Reduction of VCSS scores before treatment and at the last postoperative follow-up visit in the VariClose® group dropped by an average of 1.8 ± 1.6 and in the endovenous laser treatment by an average of 3.3 ± 2.9 (p = 0.01). VariClose® vein sealing system is inferior to endovenous laser treatment as a treatment option for varicose veins as it has a higher recanalization rate.

Background: Key anatomical factors mean that individuals needing arteriovenous access are unique and have different possibilities for fistula creation. The aim of this article is to describe a new classification system for all patients needing haemodialysis vascular access in the upper extremity with the purpose to simplify sharing the information about suitability for surgical access creation depending on vascular anatomy. Methods: According to the patient’s vascular anatomy in right and left superior extremities, patients were separated into three arteriovenous access stages (AVAS). The AVAS was validated by three blinded observers using a sample of 70 upper limb arteriovenous maps that were performed using ultrasound on patients referred for vascular access assessment. A sample size calculation was performed and calculated that for three observers, a minimum of 67 maps were required to confirm significant agreement at a Kappa value of 0.9 (95% confidence interval 0.75–0.99). Results: The Kappa value for inter-rater reliability using Fleiss’ Kappa coefficient was 0.94 and all patients fitted into the AVAS classification system. Conclusion: The AVAS classification system is a simplified way to share information about vascular access options based on a patient’s vascular anatomy with high inter-rater reliability.

StopBac is an innovative silver‐impregnated antimicrobial dressing specifically designed to reduce surgical site infections and enhance healing. The primary objective of this study was to compare infection healing rate at 30 days after surgery between primarily closed surgical wounds covered with StopBac and those covered with Cosmorpor, a standard surgical dressing. Between 1.3.2023 and 30.4.2023, we conducted a prospective screening of all patients undergoing surgical operations within a single surgical department. Patients were randomised into either the Cosmopor group or the StopBac group. Outcome measures were superficial and deep surgical site infections and healed wounds. Data concerning patient and surgical factors were prospectively collected and analysed. The analysis comprised 275 patients, divided into two groups: 140 patients in the StopBac group and 135 in the Cosmopor group. The StopBac dressing was associated with a reduced rate of infection, with an odds ratio of 0.288 (p < 0.001), and an increased likelihood of wound healing at 30 days after surgery. The odds ratio for healing at 30 days was 4.661 (p < 0.001). StopBac was associated with a lower incidence of surgical wound infections and a higher probability of healing at 30 days after surgery, when compared with standard dressing.

Objectives: The treatment of concomitant abdominal aortic aneurysms and renal tumours is controversial. The aim of this study was to ascertain which of the following three strategies, one-stage open aneurysm repair and nephrectomy, two-stage open aneurysm repair and nephrectomy or two-stage endovascular aneurysm repair and nephrectomy, is the best approach. Methods: systematic review and meta-analysis of articles published between January 1992 and April 2021 describing the treatment of concomitant abdominal aortic aneurysms and renal tumours. Results: A total of 1168 records were identified. After the selection process, 12 studies with data on 89 patients were included. Sixty-two patients underwent one-stage open procedures, 18 patients underwent two-stage open procedures and nine underwent two-stage endovascular procedures. The overall postoperative mortality was 0.82% (95% CI, 0.00–4.61). The postoperative mortality for one-stage open procedures was 3.09% (95% CI, 0.00–10.11). No deaths occurred in the postoperative period open two-stage procedures or two-stage endovascular procedures. The weighted postoperative morbidity for all procedures was 23.86% (95% CI, 12.64–35.08) and for open one-stage procedures was 37.40% (95% CI, 14.33–60.47). Data concerning postoperative complications of two-stage open procedures were extractable from only one patient in whom no complications were reported. Two postoperative complications were reported after two-stage endovascular procedures from a total of six patients with extractable postoperative data. We were unable to perform meta-analysis on long-term outcomes as the data were reported non-uniformly. Conclusion: There is currently no evidence to suggest that any procedure is associated with better outcomes. However, a one-stage open approach was the most commonly used option, favoured as it avoids delaying treatment of either of the conditions. Two-stage open procedures were preferred in cases where the surgical risk of a one-stage procedure was higher than the potential benefit. For such cases, two-stage endovascular repair is becoming more popular as a less invasive approach.