Kim M Hansen

Ms. Kim M Hansen


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
William BanksWilliam Banks
William Banks
PSPriyanka Sharma
Priyanka Sharma
KBKristin M. Bullock
Kristin M. Bullock
KHKim M Hansen
Kim M Hansen
Nils LudwigNils Ludwig
Nils Ludwig
Theresa WhitesideTheresa Whiteside
Theresa Whiteside
Extracellular vesicles can cross the blood–brain barrier (BBB), but little is known about passage. Here, we used multiple-time regression analysis to examine the ability of 10 exosome populations derived from mouse, human, cancerous, and non-cancerous cell lines to cross the BBB. All crossed the BBB, but rates varied over 10-fold. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS), an activator of the innate immune system, enhanced uptake independently of BBB disruption for six exosomes and decreased uptake for one. Wheatgerm agglutinin (WGA) modulated transport of five exosome populations, suggesting passage by adsorptive transcytosis. Mannose 6-phosphate inhibited uptake of J774A.1, demonstrating that its BBB transporter is the mannose 6-phosphate receptor. Uptake rates, patterns, and effects of LPS or WGA were not predicted by exosome source (mouse vs. human) or cancer status of the cell lines. The cell surface proteins CD46, AVβ6, AVβ3, and ICAM-1 were variably expressed but not predictive of transport rate nor responses to LPS or WGA. A brain-to-blood efflux mechanism variably affected CNS retention and explains how CNS-derived exosomes enter blood. In summary, all exosomes tested here readily crossed the BBB, but at varying rates and by a variety of vesicular-mediated mechanisms involving specific transporters, adsorptive transcytosis, and a brain-to-blood efflux system.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
William BanksWilliam Banks
William Banks
PSPriyanka Sharma
Priyanka Sharma
KHKim M Hansen
Kim M Hansen
Nils LudwigNils Ludwig
Nils Ludwig
Theresa WhitesideTheresa Whiteside
Theresa Whiteside
Exosomes mediate intercellular communication, shuttling messages between cells and tissues. We explored whether exosome tissue sequestration is determined by the exosomes or the tissues using ten radiolabeled exosomes from human or murine, cancerous or noncancerous cell lines. We measured sequestration of these exosomes by the liver, kidney, spleen, and lung after intravenous injection into male CD-1 mice. Except for kidney sequestration of three exosomes, all exosomes were incorporated by all tissues, but sequestration levels varied greatly among exosomes and tissues. Species of origin (mouse vs. human) or source (cancerous vs. noncancerous cells) did not influence tissue sequestration. Sequestration of J774A.1 exosomes by liver involved the mannose-6 phosphate (M6P) receptor. Wheatgerm agglutinin (WGA) or lipopolysaccharide (LPS) treatments enhanced sequestration of exosomes by brain and lung but inhibited sequestration by liver and spleen. Response to LPS was not predictive of response to WGA. Path and heat map analyses included our published results for brain and found distinct clusters among the exosomes and the tissues. In conclusion, we found no evidence for a universal binding site controlling exosome-tissue interactions. Instead, sequestration of exosomes by tissues is differentially regulated by both exosomes and tissues and may be stimulated or inhibited by WGA and inflammation.

15 July 2020 in bioRxiv
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
ERElizabeth Rhea
Elizabeth Rhea
ALAric F. Logsdon
Aric F. Logsdon
KHKim M Hansen
Kim M Hansen
LWLindsey Williams
Lindsey Williams
MRMay Reed
May Reed
MEMichelle Erickson
Michelle Erickson
Evidence strongly suggests that SARS-CoV-2, the cause of COVID-19, can enter the brain. SARS-CoV-2 enters cells via the S1 subunit of its spike protein, and S1 can be used as a proxy for the uptake patterns and mechanisms used by the whole virus; unlike studies based on productive infection, viral proteins can be used to precisely determine pharmacokinetics and biodistribution. Here, we found that radioiodinated S1 (I-S1) readily crossed the murine blood-brain barrier (BBB). I-S1 from two commercial sources crossed the BBB with unidirectional influx constants of 0.287 ± 0.024 μL/g-min and 0.294 ± 0.032 μL/g-min and was also taken up by lung, spleen, kidney, and liver. I-S1 was uniformly taken up by all regions of the brain and inflammation induced by lipopolysaccharide reduced uptake in the hippocampus and olfactory bulb. I-S1 crossed the BBB completely to enter the parenchymal brain space, with smaller amounts retained by brain endothelial cells and the luminal surface. Studies on the mechanisms of transport indicated that I-S1 crosses the BBB by the mechanism of adsorptive transcytosis and that the murine ACE2 receptor is involved in brain and lung uptake, but not that by kidney, liver, or spleen. I-S1 entered brain after intranasal administration at about 1/10 th the amount found after intravenous administration and about 0.66% of the intranasal dose entered blood. ApoE isoform or sex did not affect whole brain uptake, but had variable effects on olfactory bulb, liver, spleen, and kidney uptakes. In summary, I-S1 readily crosses the murine BBB, entering all brain regions and the peripheral tissues studied, likely by the mechanism of adsorptive transcytosis. Graphical

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AFAngeline Fry
Angeline Fry
ARAlexis Danielle Rose
Alexis Danielle Rose
RWRiley Weaver
Riley Weaver
KHKim M Hansen
Kim M Hansen
JBJames Ernest Blevins
James Ernest Blevins
ERElizabeth Rhea
Elizabeth Rhea
Incretin receptor agonists (IRAs) such as GLP-1-based therapies improve metabolic and cognitive outcomes and enhance brain insulin signaling. One way that IRAs could have these actions is by affecting the blood–brain barrier (BBB); however, IRA-BBB interactions are poorly studied. Here, we examined the ability of insulin and IRAs to affect each other’s transport across the BBB in lean mice. We found that intracerebroventricular (ICV) administration of the insulin receptor antagonist S961 did not affect the blood-to-brain transport of the bioactive fragment of the IRA, 125I-dulaglutide (BAF). In contrast, 125I-dulaglutide (BAF) co-administered with intravenous (IV) insulin significantly enhanced 125I-dulaglutide (BAF) BBB transport into whole brain, olfactory bulb, parietal cortex, and pons, demonstrating insulin-dependent modulation of IRA BBB transport. Regional transport rates for 125I-dulaglutide (BAF) across the brain varied by ~2.5-fold, with the fastest transport into the olfactory bulb, frontal cortex, cerebellum, and pons. Co-administration of IV dulaglutide (BAF) did not alter 125I-insulin BBB transport rates (Ki) but did reduce reversible insulin binding (Vi) at the BBB by >50%, suggesting rapid effects on BBB insulin receptors. To explore the effects of chronic IRA administration, lean mice were treated with semaglutide for two weeks. Body weight and food intake were unchanged, but female mice showed reduced fasting levels of serum insulin and GLP-1 and decreased insulin transport into whole brain, while male mice showed a reduction in insulin binding at the BBB. Chronic semaglutide also reduced 125I-insulin BBB transport in female mice when studied with in situ perfusion, a procedure that removes the immediate influence of serum factors. Together, these findings demonstrate reciprocal and female-selective interactions between IRAs and insulin at the BBB. Acute insulin enhances the BBB transport of an IRA in female mice, whereas chronic IRA exposure selectively impairs insulin BBB transport in females, highlighting the BBB as a dynamic and hormone-sensitive interface with implications for long-term treatment in mouse models and potential for translation impact in humans.