Bárbara Maria de Amorim Santos

Dr. Bárbara Maria de Amorim Santos

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

3Years (2024-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 January 2024 in Oral Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JAJosé Alcides Almeida de Arruda
José Alcides Almeida de Arruda
SOSicília Rezende Oliveira
Sicília Rezende Oliveira
FHFernanda Vieira Heimlich
Fernanda Vieira Heimlich
BSBárbara Maria de Amorim Santos
Bárbara Maria de Amorim Santos
ASAyda Henriques Schneider
Ayda Henriques Schneider
RMRicardo Alves de Mesquita
Ricardo Alves de Mesquita

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BPBarbara Fernandes Pinto
Barbara Fernandes Pinto
MPMateus Prates-Rodrigues
Mateus Prates-Rodrigues
DNDaniel Nobre
Daniel Nobre
MSMariana de Oliveira Silva
Mariana de Oliveira Silva
BSBárbara Maria de Amorim Santos
Bárbara Maria de Amorim Santos
JCJuliana Carvalho-Tavares
Juliana Carvalho-Tavares
Targeted therapies have substantially advanced cancer treatment; however, therapeutic resistance remains a major challenge, particularly in lung cancer. Polo-like kinase 1 (PLK-1), a key regulator of mitosis, is frequently overexpressed in lung tumors and has emerged as an attractive anticancer target. Although PLK-1 inhibition induces robust antitumor effects in preclinical models, its translation into clinical benefit has been limited, particularly when used as monotherapy. Previous in vitro work from our group demonstrated that combining PLK-1 inhibition with the pro-apoptotic agent Navitoclax markedly enhanced cancer cell death by reducing mitotic slippage and promoting post-mitotic apoptosis. Here, we investigated whether this combinatorial strategy translates into therapeutic benefit in vivo. Using Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC1) cells, we evaluated the effects of BI2536 (a PLK-1 inhibitor) and Navitoclax, alone or in combination, in vitro and in male C57BL/6J mice using three lung cancer models: subcutaneous, intranasal, and intrapulmonary. The in vitro results corroborated the findings of our previous work, demonstrating synergistic effects. In the murine models, tumor progression, body weight, survival, and histopathological features were assessed to evaluate therapeutic efficacy and systemic toxicity. In the subcutaneous model, BI2536 monotherapy significantly reduced tumor volume compared with vehicle-treated controls, while Navitoclax alone and the combination therapy also produced tumor growth inhibition. In contrast, in the intranasal model, no significant differences were observed in body weight or survival among groups. Nonetheless, treatment with BI2536 alone or in combination with Navitoclax significantly reduced tumor cell proliferative activity. In the aggressive intrapulmonary (orthotopic) model, rapid disease progression and high mortality were observed across all groups. Notably, BI2536 treatment was associated with improved survival compared with Navitoclax monotherapy, whereas the combination therapy did not confer additional survival benefit. Histological analyses revealed highly proliferative tumors with pronounced cellular and nuclear atypia. Moreover, the BI2536 monotherapy group exhibited significantly greater necrosis/apoptosis than the other treatment groups, while diffuse and focal hepatic steatosis was observed exclusively in the combination group. Together, these findings indicate that while PLK-1 inhibition exerts antitumor effects in certain in vivo contexts, the therapeutic synergy observed in vitro with Navitoclax does not consistently translate to in vivo lung cancer models. This study highlights the challenges of translating combinatorial mitotic and apoptotic targeting strategies into effective in vivo therapies and underscores the importance of model selection and tumor microenvironment in preclinical drug evaluation.