Bruno Costa

Dr. Bruno Costa

ICVS, School of Medicine, University of Minho
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2016 in Molecular Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RBRobert J.A. Bell
Robert J.A. Bell
HRH. Tomas Rube
H. Tomas Rube
AXAna Xavier-Magalhães
Ana Xavier-Magalhães
BCBruno Costa
Bruno Costa
AMAndrew Mancini
Andrew Mancini
JCJoseph F. Costello
Joseph F. Costello
Telomerase (TERT) activation is a fundamental step in tumorigenesis. By maintaining telomere length, telomerase relieves a main barrier on cellular lifespan, enabling limitless proliferation driven by oncogenes. The recently discovered, highly recurrent mutations in the promoter of TERT are found in over 50 cancer types, and are the most common mutation in many cancers. Transcriptional activation of TERT, via promoter mutation or other mechanisms, is the rate-limiting step in production of active telomerase. Although TERT is expressed in stem cells, it is naturally silenced upon differentiation. Thus, the presence of TERT promoter mutations may shed light on whether a particular tumor arose from a stem cell or more differentiated cell type. It is becoming clear that TERT mutations occur early during cellular transformation, and activate the TERT promoter by recruiting transcription factors that do not normally regulate TERT gene expression. This review highlights the fundamental and widespread role of TERT promoter mutations in tumorigenesis, including recent progress on their mechanism of transcriptional activation. These somatic promoter mutations, along with germline variation in the TERT locus also appear to have significant value as biomarkers of patient outcome. Understanding the precise molecular mechanism of TERT activation by promoter mutation and germline variation may inspire novel cancer cell-specific targeted therapies for a large number of cancer patients. Mol Cancer Res; 14(4); 315–23. ©2016 AACR.

13 January 2010 in Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BCBruno Costa
Bruno Costa
JSJustin S. Smith
Justin S. Smith
YCYing Chen
Ying Chen
JCJustin Chen
Justin Chen
HPHeidi S. Phillips
Heidi S. Phillips
JCJoseph F. Costello
Joseph F. Costello
HOXA genes encode critical transcriptional regulators of embryonic development that have been implicated in cancer. In this study, we documented functional relevance and mechanism of activation of HOXA9 in glioblastoma (GBM), the most common malignant brain tumor. Expression of HOXA genes was investigated using reverse transcription–PCR in primary gliomas and glioblastoma cell lines and was validated in two sets of expression array data. In a subset of GBM, HOXA genes are aberrently activated within confined chromosomal domains. Transcriptional activation of the HOXA cluster was reversible by a phosphoinostide 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor through an epigenetic mechanism involving histone H3K27 trimethylation. Functional studies of HOXA9 showed its capacity to decrease apoptosis and increase cellular proliferation along with tumor necrosis factor–related apoptosis-including ligand resistance. Notably, aberrant expression of HOXA9 was independently predictive of shorter overall and progression-free survival in two GBM patient sets and improved survival prediction by MGMT promoter methylation. Thus, HOXA9 activation is a novel, independent, and negative prognostic marker in GBM that is reversible through a PI3K-associated epigenetic mechanism. Our findings suggest a transcriptional pathway through which PI3K activates oncogenic HOXA expression with implications for mTOR or PI3K targeted therapies. Cancer Res; 70(2); 453–62

1 September 2018 in Cancer Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AMAndrew Mancini
Andrew Mancini
AXAna Xavier-Magalhães
Ana Xavier-Magalhães
WWWendy S. Woods
Wendy S. Woods
KNKien-Thiet Nguyen
Kien-Thiet Nguyen
AAAlexandra M. Amen
Alexandra M. Amen
JCJoseph F. Costello
Joseph F. Costello

13 July 2015 in Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
António SalgadoAntónio Salgado
António Salgado
JSJoão Carlos Sousa
João Carlos Sousa
BCBruno Costa
Bruno Costa
APAna O. Pires
Ana O. Pires
AMAntónio Mateus-Pinheiro
António Mateus-Pinheiro
NSNuno Sousa
Nuno Sousa
Neural stem cells (NSCs) and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) share few characteristics apart from self-renewal and multipotency. In fact, the neurogenic and osteogenic stem cell niches derive from two distinct embryonary structures; while the later originates from the mesoderm, as all the connective tissues do, the first derives from the ectoderm. Therefore, it is highly unlikely that stem cells isolated from one niche could form terminally differentiated cells from the other. Additionally, these two niches are associated to tissues/systems (e.g bone and central nervous system) that have markedly different needs and display diverse functions within the human body. Nevertheless they do share common features. For instance, the differentiation of both NSCs and MSCs is intimately associated with the bone morphogenetic protein family. Moreover, both NSCs and MSCs secrete a panel of common growth factors, such as nerve growth factor (NGF), glial derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), and brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), among others. But it is not the features they share but the interaction between them that seem most important, and worth exploring; namely, it has already been shown that there are mutually beneficially effects when these cell types are co-cultured in vitro. In fact the use of MSCs, and their secretome, become a strong candidate to be used as a therapeutic tool for CNS applications, namely by triggering the endogenous proliferation and differentiation of neural progenitors, among other mechanisms. Quite interestingly it was recently revealed that MSCs could be found in the human brain, in the vicinity of capillaries. In the present review we highlight how MSCs and NSCs in the neurogenic niches interact. Furthermore, we propose directions on this field and explore the future therapeutic possibilities that may arise from the combination/interaction of MSCs and NSCs.

16 June 2016 in Oncotarget
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
VMVera Miranda-Gonçalves
Vera Miranda-Gonçalves
Sara GranjaSara Granja
Sara Granja
Olga MartinhoOlga Martinho
Olga Martinho
MHMrinalini Honavar
Mrinalini Honavar
MPMarta Pojo
Marta Pojo
FBFatima Baltazar
Fatima Baltazar
Hypoxia-mediated upregulation of MCT1 expression supports the glycolytic phenotype of glioblastomas

10 April 2015 in Clinical Epigenetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PCPedro Costa-Pinheiro
Pedro Costa-Pinheiro
JRJoao Ramalho-Carvalho
Joao Ramalho-Carvalho
FVFilipa Quintela Vieira
Filipa Quintela Vieira
JTJorge Torres-Ferreira
Jorge Torres-Ferreira
JOJorge Oliveira
Jorge Oliveira
Carmen JeronimoCarmen Jeronimo
Carmen Jeronimo
Prostate cancer (PCa), a highly incident and heterogeneous malignancy, mostly affects men from developed countries. Increased knowledge of the biological mechanisms underlying PCa onset and progression are critical for improved clinical management. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) deregulation is common in human cancers, and understanding how it impacts in PCa is of major importance. MiRNAs are mostly downregulated in cancer, although some are overexpressed, playing a critical role in tumor initiation and progression. We aimed to identify miRNAs overexpressed in PCa and subsequently determine its impact in tumorigenesis. MicroRNA expression profiling in primary PCa and morphological normal prostate (MNPT) tissues identified 17 miRNAs significantly overexpressed in PCa. Expression of three miRNAs, not previously associated with PCa, was subsequently assessed in large independent sets of primary tumors, in which miR-182 and miR-375 were validated, but not miR-32. Significantly higher expression levels of miR-375 were depicted in patients with higher Gleason score and more advanced pathological stage, as well as with regional lymph nodes metastases. Forced expression of miR-375 in PC-3 cells, which display the lowest miR-375 levels among PCa cell lines, increased apoptosis and reduced invasion ability and cell viability. Intriguingly, in 22Rv1 cells, which displayed the highest miR-375 expression, knockdown experiments also attenuated the malignant phenotype. Gene ontology analysis implicated miR-375 in several key pathways deregulated in PCa, including cell cycle and cell differentiation. Moreover, CCND2 was identified as putative miR-375 target in PCa, confirmed by luciferase assay. A dual role for miR-375 in prostate cancer progression is suggested, highlighting the importance of cellular context on microRNA targeting.