Mesozooplankton occupies a central position in the pelagic food web, linking primary producers and the microbial loop with fish larvae, planktivorous fish, and higher trophic levels. Changes in its abundance, biomass, taxonomic composition, and diversity may simultaneously reflect variations in temperature, salinity, food resources, hydrodynamics, eutrophication, and predation pressure. Gelatinous zooplankton is particularly important in the Black Sea, where medusae and ctenophores may periodically reach high abundance and biomass and exert strong control over mesozooplankton and the early life stages of fish. Consequently, interpretation of the system should be based on the combined behaviour of the major groups and on the relative importance of spatial, seasonal, and interannual changes. This study evaluates decadal changes in mesozooplankton and gelatinous zooplankton along a coastal–shelf gradient in the Bulgarian Black Sea during 2012–2023 using data partially collected within National monitoring programme and projects (MISIS, ISMEIMP). Sampling was conducted in Varna Bay and along the Cape Galata transect, including coastal (≤30 m) and shelf (31–200 m) stations. Owing to uneven seasonal sampling, spring and summer data were combined into a warm season, while autumn and winter samples were grouped into a cold season. The specific questions we put forward were: do the coastal and shelf areas differ in total abundance and biomass; which taxonomic groups account for these differences; is there a systematic contrast between the warm and cold seasons; are monotonic changes evident between 2012 and 2023; are changes in mesozooplankton and gelatinous zooplankton synchronous; and (6) do the results justify referring to ecosystem improvement? do the coastal and shelf areas differ in total abundance and biomass; which taxonomic groups account for these differences; is there a systematic contrast between the warm and cold seasons; are monotonic changes evident between 2012 and 2023; are changes in mesozooplankton and gelatinous zooplankton synchronous; and (6) do the results justify referring to ecosystem improvement? Temporal and spatial variability in the abundance and biomass of the total mesozooplankton community and its principal taxonomic groups (Copepoda, Diplostraca (Cladocera), Meroplankton, Chaetognatha, Appendicularia and Noctiluca scintillans ) together with gelatinous zooplankton ( Aurelia aurita, Mnemiopsis leidyi, Beroe ovata and Pleurobrachia pileus ) were analysed. Differences in community composition between habitats and seasons were assessed using PRIMER 6 statistic. The analyses revealed a persistent coastal–shelf gradient, with coastal waters generally supporting higher mesozooplankton abundance (10140 ind/m³, SD±5399) and greater interannual variability than shelf waters (4221 ind/m³ SD±2400). Coastal waters are generally more productive and more strongly influenced by river runoff, local resuspension, and higher nutrient concentrations. At the same time, they are also more dynamic, which may explain the large interannual amplitude. Copepods remained the dominant component of the community throughout the study period, whereas cladocerans, meroplankton and gelatinous zooplankton exhibited marked seasonal and interannual fluctuations. Multivariate analyses demonstrated significant differences in community composition between coastal and shelf habitats, with copepods and cladocerans contributing most to the observed spatial dissimilarity. Overall indicated predominantly stable community organization, interrupted by occasional years characterized by increased dominance of gelatinous zooplankton. Trend analyses suggested that community variability was driven mainly by fluctuations in individual taxonomic groups rather than by directional long-term changes in total mesozooplankton abundance or biomass.