Floral nectaries have evolved multiple times and rapidly diversified with the adaptive radiation of animal pollinators. As such, floral nectaries exhibit extraordinary variation in location, size, shape, and secretory mechanism. Despite the intricate ties to pollinator interactions, floral nectaries are often overlooked in morphological and developmental studies. As Cleomaceae exhibits substantial floral diversity, our objective was to describe and compare floral nectaries between and within genera. Floral nectary morphology was assessed through scanning electron microscopy and histology across three developmental stages of nine Cleomaceae species including representatives for seven genera. A modified fast green and safranin O staining protocol was used to yield vibrant sections without highly hazardous chemicals. Cleomaceae floral nectaries are most commonly receptacular, located between the perianth and stamens. The floral nectaries are supplied by vasculature, often contain nectary parenchyma, and have nectarostomata. Despite the shared location, components, and secretory mechanism, the floral nectaries display dramatic diversity in size and shape, ranging from adaxial protrusions or concavities to annular disks. Our data reveal substantive lability in form with both adaxial and annular floral nectaries interspersed across Cleomaceae. Floral nectaries contribute to the vast morphological diversity of Cleomaceae flowers and so are valuable for taxonomic descriptions. Though Cleomaceae floral nectaries are often derived from the receptacle and receptacular nectaries are common across flowering plants, the role of the receptacle in floral evolution and diversification is overlooked and warrants further exploration.

Positionality refers to a researcher’s stance within the social context of their research study. It can include information such as gender, race and class, and other characteristics like location. In addition, positionality statements can also include researchers’ personal traits, such as their thoughts, feelings and behaviors. They convey a researcher’s position and are incorporated within research articles to make readers aware of the beliefs and assumptions that a scholar may be bringing into the study. Describing one’s positionality can be particularly beneficial within health professions education (HPE) research, where complex power dynamics often exist between the researcher and participants. However, there is currently limited literature on how positionality statements should be written for HPE research. This paper aims to present an introductory guide on how a novice researcher can write a positionality statement within HPE research, including elements such as reflexivity, location and context, power dynamics, and insider–outsider positioning, as well as the potential risks tied to positionality statements. Additionally, this paper provides readers with a practical step-by-step guide and a real-life example to follow when developing their own positionality statement. By practicing reflexivity and considering how their location and presence impact the research process and participants, a scholar can articulate how their identity and context shape their research approach. Consequently, adding a positionality statement can increase trustworthiness and enhance transparency of a study when they are reflexive, context-specific, ethically constructed and integrated into the research process.