Marc Scott

Dr. Marc Scott

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2015 in Child Development
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LRLeoandra Onnie Rogers
Leoandra Onnie Rogers
MSMarc Scott
Marc Scott
NWNiobe Way
Niobe Way

1 December 2006 in SLEEP
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RNRobert G. Norman
Robert G. Norman
MSMarc Scott
Marc Scott
IAIndu Ayappa
Indu Ayappa
JWJoyce A. Walsleben
Joyce A. Walsleben
DRDavid M Rapoport
David M Rapoport
To develop and demonstrate the utility of measures of sleep continuity based on survival analysis techniques.

1 May 2006 in Research in Higher Education
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MSMarc Scott
Marc Scott
TBThomas Bailey
Thomas Bailey
GKGreg Kienzl
Greg Kienzl

1 January 2013
Verified
Book
Closed access
MSMarc Scott
Marc Scott
JSJeffrey Simonoff
Jeffrey Simonoff
BMBrian Marx
Brian Marx

1 January 2016 in Political Analysis
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JMJoel A. Middleton
Joel A. Middleton
MSMarc Scott
Marc Scott
RDRonli Diakow
Ronli Diakow
JHJennifer Hill
Jennifer Hill
In the analysis of causal effects in non-experimental studies, conditioning on observable covariates is one way to try to reduce unobserved confounder bias. However, a developing literature has shown that conditioning on certain covariates may increase bias, and the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon have not been fully explored. We add to the literature on bias-increasing covariates by first introducing a way to decompose omitted variable bias into three constituent parts: bias due to an unobserved confounder, bias due toexcludingobserved covariates, and bias due to amplification. This leads to two important findings. Although instruments have been the primary focus of the bias amplification literature to date, we identify the fact that the popular approach of adding group fixed effects can lead to bias amplification as well. This is an important finding because many practitioners think that fixed effects are a convenient way to account for any and all group-level confounding and are at worst harmless. The second finding introduces the concept of biasunmaskingand shows how it can be even more insidious than bias amplification in some cases. After introducing these new results analytically, we use constructed observational placebo studies to illustrate bias amplification and bias unmasking with real data. Finally, we propose a way to add bias decomposition information to graphical displays for sensitivity analysis to help practitioners think through the potential for bias amplification and bias unmasking in actual applications.

7 November 2009 in Research in Higher Education
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NONoga O’cOnnor
Noga O’cOnnor
FHFloyd M. Hammack
Floyd M. Hammack
MSMarc Scott
Marc Scott