Thiago Junqueira Izzo

Dr. Thiago Junqueira Izzo

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2007 in Current Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PGPaulo R. Guimarães
Paulo R. Guimarães
VRVictor Rico-Gray
Victor Rico-Gray
POPaulo S. Oliveira
Paulo S. Oliveira
TIThiago Junqueira Izzo
Thiago Junqueira Izzo
SRSérgio F. dos Reis
Sérgio F. dos Reis
JTJohn N. Thompson
John N. Thompson

28 May 2013 in Oikos
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Wesley DáttiloWesley Dáttilo
Wesley Dáttilo
PGPaulo R. Guimarães
Paulo R. Guimarães
TIThiago Junqueira Izzo
Thiago Junqueira Izzo

11 June 2014 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Wesley DáttiloWesley Dáttilo
Wesley Dáttilo
RFRoberth Fagundes
Roberth Fagundes
CGCarlos A Q Gurka
Carlos A Q Gurka
MSMara S A Silva
Mara S A Silva
MVMarisa C L Vieira
Marisa C L Vieira
VRVictor Rico-Gray
Victor Rico-Gray
Despite the importance and increasing knowledge of ecological networks, sampling effort and intrapopulation variation has been widely overlooked. Using continuous daily sampling of ants visiting three plant species in the Brazilian Neotropical savanna, we evaluated for the first time the topological structure over 24 h and species-area relationships (based on the number of extrafloral nectaries available) in individual-based ant-plant networks. We observed that diurnal and nocturnal ant-plant networks exhibited the same pattern of interactions: a nested and non-modular pattern and an average level of network specialization. Despite the high similarity in the ants’ composition between the two collection periods, ant species found in the central core of highly interacting species totally changed between diurnal and nocturnal sampling for all plant species. In other words, this “night-turnover” suggests that the ecological dynamics of these ant-plant interactions can be temporally partitioned (day and night) at a small spatial scale. Thus, it is possible that in some cases processes shaping mutualistic networks formed by protective ants and plants may be underestimated by diurnal sampling alone. Moreover, we did not observe any effect of the number of extrafloral nectaries on ant richness and their foraging on such plants in any of the studied ant-plant networks. We hypothesize that competitively superior ants could monopolize individual plants and allow the coexistence of only a few other ant species, however, other alternative hypotheses are also discussed. Thus, sampling period and species-area relationship produces basic information that increases our confidence in how individual-based ant-plant networks are structured, and the need to consider nocturnal records in ant-plant network sampling design so as to decrease inappropriate inferences.


1 February 2014 in Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Wesley DáttiloWesley Dáttilo
Wesley Dáttilo
FMFlavia M. D. Marquitti
Flavia M. D. Marquitti
PGPaulo R. Guimarães
Paulo R. Guimarães
TIThiago Junqueira Izzo
Thiago Junqueira Izzo
Knowledge of the mechanisms that shape biodiversity is essential to understand the ecological and evolutionary dynamics of interacting species. Recent studies posit that most of the organization of mutualistic networks is shaped by differences in species abundance among interacting species. In this study, we examined the mutualism involving plants with extrafloral nectaries and their associated ants. We show empirically that the difference in abundance among ants on vegetation partially explains the network structure of mutualistic interactions and that it is independent of ant species compositions: an ant species that is abundant usually interacts with more plant species. Moreover, nested networks are generated by simple variation in ant abundance on foliage. However, in ant–plant mutualistic networks, nestedness was higher than in networks describing the occurrence of ants on plants without a food resource. Additionally, the plant and ant species with the highest number of interactions within these networks interacted more among themselves than expected under the assumption of an abundance‐based, random mixing of individuals. We hypothesize that the dominance of these ant species occurs because these ants are able to outcompete other ant species when feeding on extrafloral nectaries and because of the presence of ecophysiological adaptations to utilize liquid food.

21 December 2013 in Malaria Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CRClaudia M Rios-Velásquez
Claudia M Rios-Velásquez
KCKeillen Monick Campos
Keillen Monick Campos
Rejane de Castro SimõesRejane de Castro Simões
Rejane de Castro Simões
TIThiago Junqueira Izzo
Thiago Junqueira Izzo
ESEdineuza V dos Santos
Edineuza V dos Santos
PPPAULO PIMENTA
PAULO PIMENTA
Anopheles darlingi is the major malaria vector in countries located in the Amazon region. Anopheles aquasalis and Anopheles albitarsis s.l. are also proven vectors in this region. Anopheles nuneztovari s.l. and Anopheles triannulatus s.l. were found infected with Plasmodium vivax; however, their status as vectors is not yet well defined. Knowledge of susceptibility of Amazon anopheline populations to Plasmodium infection is necessary to better understand their vector capacity. Laboratory colonization of An. darlingi, the main Amazon vector, has proven to be difficult and presently An. aquasalis is the only available autonomous colony.