Andréia De Cássia Rodrigues Soares Alarcon

Mrs. Andréia De Cássia Rodrigues Soares Alarcon


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

1Year (2026-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 June 2026 in Sci
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AAAndréia De Cássia Rodrigues Soares Alarcon
Andréia De Cássia Rodrigues Soares Alarcon
GNGIOVANA KATIA VIANA NUCCI
GIOVANA KATIA VIANA NUCCI
EMElaine Melo
Elaine Melo
MAMarta Aratuza Pereira Ancel
Marta Aratuza Pereira Ancel
RCRegiane Santana da Conceição Ferreira Cabanha
Regiane Santana da Conceição Ferreira Cabanha
VNValter Aragão do Nascimento
Valter Aragão do Nascimento
Lithium carbonate is a cornerstone therapy for bipolar disorder, typically administered long-term, which necessitates strict control of elemental impurities beyond the quantification of the active ingredient. While previous studies focused on lithium concentration and dosing accuracy, this study characterized the unique inorganic signatures and evaluated the toxicological implications of reference, similar, and generic lithium carbonate formulations marketed in Brazil. Seven commercial brands were analyzed by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP OES). Elemental concentrations (mg/kg) ranged as follows: As (0.50–0.62), Pb (0.39–0.57), Se (0.80–1.01), Cr (detected in one similar formulation at 0.18), Fe (<LOD–0.86), Mg (8.10–14.65), K (1.18–4.2), Mn (0.072–0.40), and P (24.3–74.4), while Cd, Cu, and Zn were below detection limits. Statistical analysis (p < 0.05) demonstrated significant inter-manufacturer differences, indicating that pharmaceutical equivalence does not imply inorganic identity. Despite this variability, all formulations complied with ICH Q3D (R2), USP , and Brazilian Pharmacopoeia limits. Under maintenance doses of 600–1200 mg/day, daily exposure remained well below Permitted Daily Exposure thresholds; the cumulative Hazard Index was <0.02, and Incremental Lifetime Cancer Risk (5.46 to 6.80 × 10−6) was within safe levels. These findings confirm that while distinct elemental signatures exist, the medications are toxicologically safe for chronic therapy.