Aims The clinical course including the outcome of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) correlates with renal dysfunction, but the evaluation of renal function has not yet been standardized. We therefore investigated the relationship between the prognosis of ADHF and acute kidney injury (AKI) evaluated using the risk, injury, failure, loss, end stage (RIFLE) criteria. Methods and results This study assessed 376 consecutive patients with ADHF admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) (mean age 71.6 years; 238 male). The underlying aetiology was ischaemic heart disease, hypertensive heart disease, cardiomyopathy, valvular diseases, and ‘other’ in 124, 70, 60, 107, and 15 patients, respectively. We defined AKI according to the RIFLE criteria, and the most severe RIFLE classifications during hospitalization were adopted to assess patient outcomes. The in‐hospital mortality was significantly higher among patients with AKI (29 of 275; 10.5%) than in those without AKI (1 of 101; 1.0%, P = 0.0010). Both ICU and hospital stays were longer for patients with AKI (8.8 ± 15.4 vs. 48.6 ± 47.6 days), than for patients without (5.0 ± 2.8 vs. 25.7 ± 16.8 days, P < 0.05 and P < 0.001). Conclusion Acute kidney injury evaluated by the RIFLE criteria was associated with a poorer outcome for patients with ADHF.
Background: The relationship between acute kidney injury (AKI) in the acute phase of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) and patient outcome has not yet been reported. Methods and Results: Data for 625 patients with ADHF admitted to the intensive care unit were analyzed. No AKI occurred in 281 patients (no AKI) during the first 5 days. The AKI patients were assigned to 3 groups based on the timing: AKI present on admission and stable risk, injury, failure, loss, and endstage (RIFLE) class (stable early AKI; n=125), stepped-up RIFLE class (worsening early AKI; n=49), or AKI that occurred after admission (late AKI; n=170). The AKI patients were grouped into another 3 groups based on severity: class R (risk; n=214), class I (injury; n=73), or class F (failure; n=57). A multivariate logistic regression model found class I, class F, late AKI and worsening early AKI to be independently associated with in-hospital mortality. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that the survival rate in any-cause death during 2 years was significantly lower in class I, class F and the worsening early-AKI group, and there were significantly more HF events in class F and the worsening early-AKI group. There were significantly more class I and class F patients in the worsening early-AKI group. Conclusions: The presence of AKI on admission, worsening of AKI, and severe AKI (class I or class F) are associated with a poorer prognosis for ADHF patients. (Circ J 2013; 77: 687–696)
1 November 2015 in The American Journal of Cardiology
Background—: Intravascular ultrasound detects stent edge dissections after percutaneous coronary intervention that are not seen angiographically. This study investigated the association between stent edge dissections and clinical outcomes. Methods and Results—: ADAPT-DES (Assessment of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy With Drug-Eluting Stents) was a large-scale, prospective, multicenter study of patients undergoing drug-eluting stent implantation. In this prospective substudy, 2062 patients (2433 lesions) were evaluated with intravascular ultrasound to characterize the morphological features and clinical outcomes of stent edge dissection after percutaneous coronary intervention. The prevalence of post–percutaneous coronary intervention stent edge dissection was 6.6% per lesion (161 of 2433). Calcified plaque at the proximal stent edge (relative risk [RR]=1.72; P =0.04) and proximal stent edge expansion (RR=1.18; P =0.004) were predictors for proximal dissection; attenuated plaque at the distal stent edge (RR=3.52; P =0.004), distal reference plaque burden (RR=1.56; P <0.0001), and distal edge stent expansion (RR=1.11; P =0.02) were predictors for distal dissection. At 1-year follow-up, target lesion revascularization was more common in lesions with versus without dissection (5.2% versus 2.7%; P =0.04). Multivariable analysis indicated that residual dissection was associated with target lesion revascularization at 1-year follow-up (RR=2.67; P =0.02). Among lesions with dissection, smaller effective lumen area increased the risk of target lesion revascularization at 1-year follow-up (cutoff value of 5.1 mm 2 ; P =0.05). Conclusions—: Greater stent expansion and the presence of large, calcified, and/or attenuated plaques were independent predictors of stent edge dissection. Residual stent edge dissection, especially with a smaller effective lumen area, was associated with target lesion revascularization during 1-year follow-up after drug-eluting stent implantation. Clinical Trial Registration—: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00638794.
Objectives: We sought to clarify clinical features and outcomes related to calcified nodules (CN) compared with plaque rupture (PR) and plaque erosion (PE) detect