Cardiac symptoms are increasingly recognized as late complications of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in previously well individuals with mild initial illness, but the underlying pathophysiology leading to long-term cardiac symptoms remains unclear. In this study, we conducted serial cardiac assessments in a selected population of individuals with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) with no previous cardiac disease or notable comorbidities by measuring blood biomarkers of heart injury or dysfunction and by performing magnetic resonance imaging. Baseline measurements from 346 individuals with COVID-19 (52% females) were obtained at a median of 109 days (interquartile range (IQR), 77–177 days) after infection, when 73% of participants reported cardiac symptoms, such as exertional dyspnea (62%), palpitations (28%), atypical chest pain (27%) and syncope (3%). Symptomatic individuals had higher heart rates and higher imaging values or contrast agent accumulation, denoting inflammatory cardiac involvement, compared to asymptomatic individuals. Structural heart disease or high levels of biomarkers of cardiac injury or dysfunction were rare in symptomatic individuals. At follow-up (329 days (IQR, 274–383 days) after infection), 57% of participants had persistent cardiac symptoms. Diffuse myocardial edema was more pronounced in participants who remained symptomatic at follow-up as compared to those who improved. Female gender and diffuse myocardial involvement on baseline imaging independently predicted the presence of cardiac symptoms at follow-up. Ongoing inflammatory cardiac involvement may, at least in part, explain the lingering cardiac symptoms in previously well individuals with mild initial COVID-19 illness.

Introduction Systemic low-grade inflammation is a fundamental pathophysiological mechanism of heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (HFpEF). The efficacy of anti-inflammatory therapy in HFpEF is largely understudied. The aim of the study is to assess the anti-inflammatory effect of colchicine in HFpEF by looking at inflammatory biomarkers: high-sensitivity C reactive protein (hsCRP) and soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2). Methods and analysis This is a single-centre, prospective, randomised controlled, open-label, blinded-endpoint crossover clinical trial of stable but symptomatic patients with HFpEF. Patients will be randomised to either colchicine treatment 0.5 mg two times per day or usual care for 12 weeks followed by a 2-week washout period and crossover to 12 weeks of treatment with the alternate therapy. The primary objective is to investigate if administration of colchicine compared with usual care reduces inflammation in patients with HFpEF measured by primary endpoint sST2 and co-primary endpoint hsCRP at baseline and 12-week follow-up. Secondary objective is to determine if treatment with colchicine influences N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels, left ventricular diastolic function and remodelling, right ventricular systolic function and left atrial volumetric characteristics. We are aiming to enrol a total of 40 participants. This trial will answer the question if colchicine treatment reduces systemic low-grade inflammation and influences left ventricular diastolic function and remodelling with patients with HFpEF. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Sechenov University (reference: 03-22). Trial registration number NCT05637398.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (RAs) are emerging glucose-lowering agents primarily used in managing diabetes and obesity. Recently, GLP-1 RAs have garnered attention for their cardiovascular benefits beyond glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes, exhibiting patterns previously seen in cardiovascular outcomes trials on sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, which now receive a high level of recommendation for the treatment of heart failure (HF). GLP-1 RAs have been increasingly investigated in HF cohorts, but mainly in small-scale studies reporting inconclusive findings regarding clinical outcomes and different safety profiles in HF patients with reduced and preserved ejection fractions. This review discusses the effects of GLP-1 RAs on surrogate HF outcomes, such as cardiac structure and function, exercise capacity and quality of life, in HF patients across the spectrum of left ventricular ejection fraction, to provide insights into the potential of these agents to be investigated in large clinical trials to evaluate clinical outcomes.

Lingering cardiac symptoms are increasingly recognised complications of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection, now referred to as post-acute cardiovascular sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC). In the acute phase, cardiac injury is driven by cytokine release and stems from ischaemic and thrombotic complications, resulting in myocardial necrosis. Patients with pre-existing cardiac conditions are particularly vulnerable. Myocarditis due to a direct viral infection is rare. Chronic symptoms relate to either worsening of pre-existing heart disease (PASC – cardiovascular disease) or delayed chronic inflammatory condition due to heterogenous immune dysregulation (PASC – cardiovascular syndrome), the latter affecting a broad segment of previously well people. Both PASC presentations are associated with increased cardiovascular risk, long-term disability and reduced quality of life. The recognition and management of PASC in clinical settings remains a considerable challenge. Sensitive diagnostic methods are needed to detect subtler inflammatory changes that underlie the persistent symptoms in PASC – cardiovascular syndrome, alongside considerable clinical experience in inflammatory cardiac conditions.

Rakisheva A, et al. Int J Heart Fail. 2024 Jul;6(3):93-106. https://doi.org/10.36628/ijhf.2023.0064