Eleanor Jane Crossley

Ms. Eleanor Jane Crossley

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2013 in Psychiatry Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ECEleanor Jane Crossley
Eleanor Jane Crossley
ACAndrea Eugenio Cavanna
Andrea Eugenio Cavanna

1 January 2014 in Brain and Development
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ECEleanor Jane Crossley
Eleanor Jane Crossley
SSStefano Seri
Stefano Seri
JSJeremy S. Stern
Jeremy S. Stern
MRMary M. Robertson
Mary M. Robertson
ACAndrea E. Cavanna
Andrea E. Cavanna

28 February 2020 in The Laryngoscope
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ECEleanor Jane Crossley
Eleanor Jane Crossley
TBTim Biggs
Tim Biggs
PBPhillip Brown
Phillip Brown
TSTahwinder Singh
Tahwinder Singh

5 May 2017 in The Clinical Teacher
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JMJacob H Matthews
Jacob H Matthews
GMGabriella L Morley
Gabriella L Morley
ECEleanor Jane Crossley
Eleanor Jane Crossley
SBShivam Bhanderi
Shivam Bhanderi

1 January 2015 in Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MWM Walsh
M Walsh
ERE Redshaw
E Redshaw
ECEleanor Jane Crossley
Eleanor Jane Crossley
CPC Phillips
C Phillips
Background: Permanent congenital hearing loss affects up to 6/1000 births in developing countries. Currently, in Uganda there is no newborn screening for hearing loss (NSHL) program and no published work on this topic. Within the existing healthcare system there are two opportunities to deliver screening, at birth or 6 weeks of age when infants receive their immunizations. Aim: This study explored the outcomes of otoacoustic emission (OAE) testing in infants at birth and 6 weeks of age, to identify the optimal age for screening. Subjects and Methods: This cross-sectional pilot study recruited 60 consecutive infants from two health centres in Kampala, Uganda. Thirty infants were newborns recruited from the postnatal ward and 30 were aged 4–8 weeks from the immunization clinic, we performed OAE testing on all infants. Results: The results showed 56.7% (17/30) of newborn infants passed OAE testing compared with 90.0% (27/30) of the immunization infants, P < 0.01. Furthermore, of the 11 newborn infants aged ≥24 h of age 90.9% (10/11) passed, compared with the 19 infants <24 h of age where 37% (7/19) passed, P < 0.01. Conclusions: This study demonstrates a higher pass rate for OAE testing for infants ≥24 h of age compared to those <24 h of age. The overall lower pass rate of the newborn infants could be due to external ear debris and middle ear fluid compromising the OAE testing. These findings would support a NSHL programme in Uganda that offers screening to infants ≥24 h of age, to maximize the cost-effectiveness of the program.

1 December 2020 in The Laryngoscope
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TST Singh
T Singh
TBTimothy Biggs
Timothy Biggs
ECEleanor Jane Crossley
Eleanor Jane Crossley
MFMorad Faoury
Morad Faoury
AMAbid Mahmood
Abid Mahmood
PBPhillip Brown
Phillip Brown