Debate regarding the optimal initial treatment for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries in children and adolescents has not resulted in a clear consensus for initial nonoperative treatment or operative reconstruction. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to systematically analyze aggregated data from the literature to determine if a benefit exists for either nonoperative or early operative treatment for ACL injuries in the pediatric patient. The hypothesis was that combined results would favor early operative reconstruction with respect to posttreatment episodes of instability/pathological laxity, symptomatic meniscal tears, clinical outcome scores, and return to activity. Meta-analysis. A literature selection process included the extraction of data on the following clinical variables: symptomatic meniscal tears, return to activities, clinical outcome scores, return to the operating room, and posttreatment instability/pathological laxity. A symptomatic meniscal tear was defined as occurring after the initial presentation, limiting activity, and requiring further treatment. Instability/pathological laxity was defined for the sake of this study as having an episode of giving way, a grade ≥2 Lachman/pivot-shift test result, or a side-to-side difference of >4 mm as measured by the KT-1000 arthrometer. All studies were evaluated using a formal study quality analysis. Meta-analysis was conducted for aggregated data in each category. Six studies (217 patients) comparing operative to nonoperative treatment and 5 studies (353 patients) comparing early to delayed reconstruction were identified. Three studies reported posttreatment instability/pathological laxity; 13.6% of patients after operative treatment experienced instability/pathological laxity compared with 75% of patients after nonoperative treatment (P < .01). Two studies reported symptomatic meniscal tears; patients were over 12 times more likely to have a medial meniscal tear after nonoperative treatment than after operative treatment (35.4% vs 3.9%, respectively; P = .02). A significant difference in scores between groups was noted in 1 of 2 studies reporting International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores (P = .002) and in 1 of 2 studies reporting Tegner scores (P = .007). Two studies reported return to activity; none of the patients in the nonoperative groups returned to their previous level of play compared with 85.7% of patients in the operative groups (P < .01). Study quality analysis revealed that the majority of the studies were inconsistent in reporting outcomes. Meta-analysis revealed multiple trends that favor early surgical stabilization over nonoperative or delayed treatment. Patients after nonoperative and delayed treatment experienced more instability/pathological laxity and inability to return to previous activity levels than did patients treated with early surgical stabilization.

Treating ACL injuries in prepubescent patients requires balancing the risk of chondral and meniscal injuries associated with delaying treatment against the risk of growth disturbance from early surgical reconstruction. Multiple physeal respecting techniques have been described to address this vulnerable population; however, none restore the native ACL attachments while keeping the graft and fixation entirely in the epiphysis. We describe a technique of all-epiphyseal ACL reconstruction for use in prepubescent skeletally immature patients. Intraoperative CT scanning with three-dimensional (3-D) reconstruction was used to confirm the precise localization of the all-epiphyseal femoral and tibial tunnels. The femoral tunnel is drilled entirely in the epiphysis of the lateral femoral condyle. The tibial tunnel is drilled from inside-out to the level of the tibial physis using a retrograde drill. Fixation of the soft tissue graft is achieved with a retrograde interference screw in the tibia and an interference screw in the femur. Case examples are presented for three boys aged 10–12, Tanner Stage 1 development, with a minimum followup of 1 year. All three patients had stable knees based on Lachman and KT-1000 testing and no evidence of growth disturbance. All had full ROM and symmetric strength for knee flexion and extension. All patients returned to their sports activities using a custom ACL brace. Although longer-term followup will be necessary, this technique provides for an anatomic all-epiphyseal-based ACL reconstruction using intraoperative 3-D imaging to minimize the risk of growth disturbance. Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background: Tibial tuberosity fractures in adolescents are uncommon. We retrospectively reviewed all tibial tuberosity fractures in adolescents (10–19) who presented to our level 1 pediatric trauma center over a 7-year period to review fracture morphology, mechanism of injury, fracture management including return to play, as well as complications. Additionally, we present a review of the literature and treatment algorithm. Methods: We reviewed the clinical charts and radiographs of consecutive patients with tibial tuberosity fractures between 01 January 2000 and 01 January 2007. Data parameters included the following: patients age and gender, involved side, injury classification, co-morbidities, mechanism of injury, treatment, return to activity and complications. Data were extracted and reviewed, and a treatment algorithm is proposed with some additional insights into the epidemiology of the injury. Nineteen patients met the inclusion criteria. Results: There were 19 patients with 20 tibial tuberosity fractures. The mean age was 13.7 years. There were 18 males and 1 female patient. There were nine left-sided injuries and eleven right-sided including one patient with bilateral fractures. Mechanism of injuries included basketball injury (8), running injury (5), football injury (3), fall from a scooter (2), high jump (1) and fall (1). Co-morbidities included three patients with concurrent Osgood–Schlatter disease and one with osteogenesis imperfecta. All were treated with ORIF, including arthroscopic-assisted techniques in two cases. Complications included four patients with pre-operative presentation of compartment syndrome all requiring fasciotomy, one post-operative stiffness and one painful hardware requiring removal. Range of motion was started an average of 4.3 weeks post-operatively and return to play was an average of 3.9 months post-operatively. Conclusion: Although uncommon, tibial tuberosity fractures in adolescents are clinically important injuries. Early recognition and treatment (closed or open as appropriate) gives good results. All the patients in our series had surgical fixation as per different indications that have been elaborated. It is important for clinicians to recognize that compartment syndrome remains a significant concern post-injury and in the perioperative period. Close monitoring and timely intervention is recommended. A simple treatment algorithm is presented for clinicians to help manage these injuries.

Tibial eminence fractures are rare but occur more frequently in children and adolescents. There are a variety of methods to surgically treat these fractures, but surgeons disagree about the optimal method of reduction and fixation. Regarding clinical results and complications after treatment in children and adolescent patients with tibial eminence fractures, the authors hypothesize that (1) there is no difference between reduction and fixation with screws versus sutures, (2) there is no difference in arthroscopic versus open reduction and fixation, and (3) outcomes are better in patients with minimally displaced (types I and II) versus completely displaced (types III and IV) fractures. Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. A systematic review of the literature was performed studying the treatment of tibial eminence fractures in children and adolescents to determine clinical results, functional outcomes, and complications. A meta-analytic technique on observational studies was used to compare outcomes when sufficient data were available. The review identified 26 articles with extractable clinical results and data on complications: 1 level 3 article and 25 level 4 articles. Ten of 580 tibial eminence fractures identified in the literature had nonunion, with 60% of nonunions occurring in type III fractures treated by nonoperative modalities. Appreciable healing was noted for both open and arthroscopic fixation techniques as well as patients treated by screw or suture fixation. Laxity (P < .001) and loss of range of motion (P = .009) occurred significantly less after the treatment of minimally displaced fractures (types I and II). The level of evidence supporting various treatments of tibial eminence fractures in children and adolescents is low. There is insufficient evidence to conclude the superiority of open versus arthroscopic fixation or screw versus suture fixation techniques. Nonoperative treatment of completely displaced tibial eminence fractures results in higher rates of nonunion. Type III and IV fractures heal with greater laxity and greater loss of range of motion after treatment. Higher level studies are necessary to determine the optimal method of fixation for tibial eminence fractures.

Background: Arthrofibrosis and decreased range of motion (ROM) are well-described sequelae of tibial eminence fractures. We sought to evaluate the effects of timing of ROM rehabilitation and postsurgical immobilization on clinical outcomes in children with fractures of the tibial eminence. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of all children diagnosed with closed tibial eminence fractures between 2000 and 2010. Patients were treated by experienced surgeons with uniform requirements for return to full activity. Results: Fourteen females and 26 males (40 knees) of mean age 12 years (range, 5 to 17 y) started ROM therapy for a mean of 23 days after treatment (range, 4 to 47 d). Seven patients required additional surgeries for arthrofibrosis at a mean of 3 months after initial fracture treatment (range, 1.5 to 5.5 mo). Compared with patients who started ROM rehabilitation within 4 weeks of treatment, those who started later than 4 weeks required more days to return to full activity (215 vs. 103 d; P=0.011) and were 12 times more likely to develop arthrofibrosis (P=0.029). Even when accounting for other factors in multivariate regression, earlier initiation of ROM therapy was associated with earlier return to full activity (P<0.001). Surgical patients who were immobilized postoperatively required more days to return to full activity (217.5 vs. 103 d; P=0.015) and had a higher rate of arthrofibrosis (36% vs. 0%; P=0.043) than those who were not. Age, sex, fracture classification, and operative versus nonoperative treatment did not have a statistically significant effect on our multivariate model. Conclusions: After definitive treatment, early implementation of ROM rehabilitation results in a more rapid return to full activity. ROM therapy within 4 weeks of treatment results in sooner return to full activity and decreases the likelihood of eventual arthrofibrosis. In surgical patients, postoperative immobilization results in a longer delay until return to full activity and a higher rate of arthrofibrosis. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic study, level III.