Objective: To investigate the prognostic value of clinical and inflammatory markers predicting response to nivolumab in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Materials and Methods: Clinical, demographic and laboratory data of stage 4 NSCLC patients who were treated between February 2021 and November 2024 were analyzed. Before nivolumab treatment, inflammatory markers such as neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), hemoglobin-albumin-lymphocyte-platelet score (HALP), neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER) and C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR) were calculated. Factors affecting overall survival (OS) were determined by Cox regression analysis, and ROC curve analysis was used to calculate the ideal cut-off. Results: The study included 229 NSCLC patients and the median age of the patients was 63 years. The majority were male (84.3%) and had right lung localization (56.8%). Median overall survival was calculated as 21.2 months (95% CI: 17.4– 25.0). In univariate cox-regression analysis, the presence of brain metastases (HR: 2.08; p=0.004), liver metastases (HR: 1.85; p=0.014) and adrenal metastases (HR: 1.64; p=0.045) negatively affected the treatment response. Inflammatory markers such as high NLR (HR: 2.04; p< 0.001), high SII (HR: 1.96; p< 0.001), high CAR (HR: 1.84; p=0.001), high PLR (HR: 1.60; p=0.009) and high SIRI (HR: 1.51; p=0.021), low PNI (HR: 0.48; p< 0.001), low HALP (HR: 0.49; p< 0.001) and low LMR (HR: 0.65; p=0.016) were associated with poor prognosis. In multivariate analysis, the presence of brain metastasis (HR: 2.84; p< 0.001), adrenal metastasis (HR: 1.64; p=0.046) and low PNI (HR: 0.44; p< 0.001) together predicted poor prognosis and formed a statistical model on treatment response. Conclusion: In patients with metastatic NSCLC, nivolumab treatment response is predicted by inflammatory markers and the presence of brain and adrenal metastases. It was concluded that low PNI among inflammatory markers is a strong prognostic indicator in this patient group.

Aim: Endocrine therapy (ET) plus cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors is a standard treatment for hormone receptor (HR) positive HER-2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of body mass index (BMI) on progression-free survival (PFS) in patients receiving ET plus CDK 4/6 inhibitors.Materials & methods: Patients with metastatic HR-positive breast cancer receiving CDK 4/6 inhibitors were included in the study. A total of 116 patients were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were divided into three groups according to BMI level: normal weight (group 1) 18.5-24.9 kg/m², overweight (group 2) 25-29.9 kg/m² and obese (group 3): ≥30 kg/m². Median follow-up was 10.83 months. Comparisons of PFS and BMI categories were performed by Kaplan-Meier curve and log-rank test.Results: PFS was 9.3 (5.3-13.4) months in normal weight patients and 11.1 (9.7-12.56) months in obese patients and was not reached in overweight patients. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.02).Conclusion: Low BMI has been shown to have a negative prognostic effect on survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer and overweight patients had a longer PFS.

Fluoropyrimidine+cisplatin/oxaliplatin+trastuzumab therapy is recommended for the first-line treatment of HER2-positive metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma. However, there is no comprehensive study on which platinum-based treatment should be preferred. This study aimed to compare the treatment response and survival characteristics of patients with HER2-positive metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer who received fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and leucovorin (mFOLFOX)+trastuzumab or cisplatin and fluorouracil (CF)+trastuzumab as first-line therapy. It was a multicenter, retrospective study of the Turkish Oncology Group, which included 243 patients from 21 oncology centers. There were 113 patients in the mFOLFOX+trastuzumab arm and 130 patients in the CF+trastuzumab arm. The median age was 62 years in the mFOLFOX+trastuzumab arm and 61 years in the CF+trastuzumab arm (P = 0.495). 81.4% of patients in the mFOLFOX+trastuzumab arm and 83.1% in the CF+trastuzumab arm had gastric tumor localization (P = 0.735). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly higher in the mFOLFOX+trastuzumab arm (9.4 months vs. 7.3 months, P = 0.024). The median overall survival (OS) was similar in both groups (18.4 months vs. 15.1 months, P = 0.640). Maintenance trastuzumab was continued after chemotherapy in 101 patients. In this subgroup, the median OS was 23.3 months and the median PFS was 13.3 months. In conclusion, FOLFOX+trastuzumab is similar to CF+trastuzumab in terms of the median OS, but it is more effective in terms of the median PFS in the first-line treatment of HER2-positive metastatic gastric and GEJ cancer. The choice of treatment should be made by considering the prominent toxicity findings of the chemotherapy regimens.

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab emtansine in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with pertuzumab plus trastuzumab and taxane. We reviewed the medical records of patients who were diagnosed with Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER-2) positive metastatic breast cancer and received pertuzumab and then TDM-1 between January 2014 and January 2021 from twenty- five cancer centers. The Kaplan- Meier method estimated progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Additionally, objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and safety were evaluated. One hundred fifty-three patients were included,79.1% of the patients received TDM-1 in the second line, 90.8% had visceral metastasis, and 30.7% had central nervous system involvement. The PFS and OS of TDM-1 were evaluated according to the number of previous lines (on the 2nd line or more than two lines) metastatic sites (visceral and non-visceral) and the presence of central nervous metastasis. In TDM-1 therapy, PFS in second line therapy was ten months (95% CI: 7.7 - 12.2); this was statistically higher than later-line PFS, which was six months (95% CI: 3.3 to 8.6) (p = 0.004). The median OS time was 25 months (95% CI: 21.0 to 28.9) in patients treated with TDM-1 in the second line and 19 months (95% CI: 12.3 to 25.6) in patients who received later than the second line(p = 0.175). There were no significant differences in PFS time of patients with and without visceral and central nervous metastases. Our study showed that TDM-1 was also effective in patients using pertuzumab, contributes significantly to PFS when used in the second line compared to its use in the later line, and does not make any difference in OS.

Background and Objectives: Clinically meaningful drug–drug interactions may be overlooked in oncology. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) may modulate outcomes with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) by altering the gut microbiome, altering the immune milieu, and affecting transporter interactions. We evaluated whether concomitant PPI use affects survival among patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with nivolumab. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively included patients with metastatic NSCLC who received second-line nivolumab across five oncology centers (January 2020–June 2023). Patients were grouped as concomitant PPI users vs. non-users. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method and compared with the log-rank test; multivariable Cox models assessed independent associations. Results: A total of 194 patients were screened, of whom 30 were excluded according to predefined criteria. The final analysis included 164 patients—85 PPI users and 79 non-users. Median OS was 26.1 months (95% CI 15.5–36.7) in PPI users and 29.3 months (22.2–36.4) in non-users; this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.54). Median PFS was 6.2 months (3.7–8.6) in PPI users vs. 10.2 months (7.1–13.2) in non-users (p = 0.04). In multivariable analysis, absence of concomitant PPI use (No vs. Yes) was independently associated with longer PFS (HR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.24–0.89, p = 0.03), whereas PPI use was not associated with OS (HR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.67–1.61, p = 0.83). Conclusions: Concomitant PPI use during nivolumab therapy was associated with significantly shorter PFS and a numerical reduction in OS in real-world metastatic NSCLC. Where clinically feasible, the need for PPIs should be re-evaluated before and during ICI therapy.