Safe and resilient operation of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) storage and distribution stations is important to the sustainability of fuel infrastructure, yet boiling liquid expanding vapor explosion (BLEVE) prevention requires time-dependent barrier analysis and a clear separation between prevention priorities and post-rupture exposure. This study develops a dynamic–spatial screening framework that integrates evidence-graded basic events, a priority-AND dynamic fault tree, a continuous-time Markov chain (CTMC), memory-efficient Monte Carlo trajectory simulation, modeled-area prevention prioritization, and tank-origin relative-exposure screening. A one-million-trajectory accelerated numerical baseline produced 112,693 BLEVE-conditioned trajectories. Weld cracking and fire-pump failure had the highest dynamic criticality because they act in later barrier-degradation stages, whereas high-wind spread had the greatest conditional involvement. Tank structure had the highest modeled-area prevention priority. Receiver rankings depended on the assumed layout: P5 ranked first under the baseline schematic coordinates, whereas P2 ranked first under the illustrative metric-coordinate scenario across the tested distance-attenuation kernels. Convergence, acceleration-factor, evidence-grade, weight, recovery, alternative-path, static-importance, coordinate, and kernel sensitivities were evaluated. Prevention-priority scores and normalized exposure indices are reported separately and are not interpreted as calibrated accident frequency, physical dose, expected loss, or quantitative risk. By supporting targeted inspection, maintenance, monitoring, and emergency-resource allocation, the framework can contribute to safer, more resilient, and more sustainable operation of LPG infrastructure.

Deep phosphate mining operations face complex, dynamic working conditions characterized by the superimposed disturbances of high temperature, high stress, and high strain. The occurrence of rockburst disasters demonstrates a clear pattern of dynamic evolution. Traditional rockburst risk assessment methods mostly adopt a static analysis approach, making it difficult to accurately grasp the dynamic characteristics of the entire process of a rockburst from inception and development to occurrence, and also making it hard to meet the practical work requirements of deep phosphate mining safety management. To address this engineering problem, this study constructs a superimposed analysis model for the risk of underground rockburst accidents in deep phosphate drilling based on a dynamic fault tree, and strives to tackle the complex dynamic issues in rockburst risk analysis and prediction. This model retains the technical advantages of traditional fault tree logical reasoning, integrates the time-series analysis function of dynamic fault trees, and organizes and describes various risk factors of deep phosphate rockbursts, as well as the concurrent, selective, and time-overlapping correlations among each factor. Finally, by introducing dynamic logic gates such as priority gates and standby gates, combined with the quantitative representation of rockburst risk stacking effects, it achieves dynamic risk assessment and accurate prediction of rockburst disasters. The model construction strictly follows the core processes of top event definition, hierarchical decomposition of risk factors, and dynamic logic structure construction, and organically integrates risk stacking theory with the dynamic fault tree method, forming an emergency rockburst risk prediction system that can provide technical support for reducing the probability of deep phosphate rockburst accidents. The rock fracture risk superposition model developed in this study aims to provide a tool for risk identification and spatial superposition analysis in deep phosphate mining, minimizing disturbances to the mine’s ecological environment, and offering theoretical support and technical methods for safe and green mining, sustainable development, and high-quality exploitation of deep phosphate resources.