Irinotecan is widely used in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) despite its severe toxicities. Toxicity is often associated with the UGT1A1*28/*28 genotype. An explanation for idiopathic toxicity beyond the UGT1A1 biomarker, however, remains a major concern for clinicians. One of the main irinotecan transporters is P-glycoprotein (P-gp), which is a hepatic efflux pump encoded by ABCB1. P-gp is involved in the biliary excretion of irinotecan and its active metabolite SN-38. We aimed to assess whether functional variants in ABCB1 also contribute to identifying patients at risk of toxicity. A cohort of 308 mCRC patients treated with irinotecan-based regimens were genotyped for polymorphisms in ABCB1 (rs1128503, rs2032582, and rs1045642). The effect of these variants and their haplotypes on irinotecan-induced severe toxicity (diarrhea, neutropenia, asthenia, nausea, and mucositis) was assessed. After adjusting for the relevant clinical and pathological parameters in the multivariate analysis, we found rs1128503 was significantly associated with severe diarrhea and mucositis (P=0.014 and P=0.002, respectively). Additionally, rs2032582 was associated with severe mucositis (P<0.001). Our results show that rs1128503 genotyping could help to predict severe gastrointestinal toxicity induced by irinotecan.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on anthracyclines and ifosfamide for high-risk soft tissue sarcomas (STS) of the extremities and trunk is a controversial treatment option. There are substantial interindividual differences in clinical outcomes in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate, as biomarkers, polymorphisms in genes encoding drug-metabolizing enzymes, drug transporters, or drug targets and their association with toxicity and survival in STS patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We analysed variants in genes involved in anthracycline metabolism (ABCB1, ABCC2, NQO1, CBR3, and SLC22A16) and in ifosfamide catabolism (ALDH1A1) in 79 treated patients. Two genes showed significant association after adjusted multivariate analysis: ABCC2 and ALDH1A1. In patients treated with anthracyclines, ABCC2 rs3740066 was associated with risk of febrile neutropenia (p = 0.031), and with decreased overall survival (OS) (p = 0.024). ABCC2 rs2273697 was associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS) (p = 0.024). In patients treated with ifosfamide, ALDH1A1 rs3764435 was associated with RFS (p = 0.046). Our pharmacogenetic study shows for the first time that variants in genes regulating the metabolism of neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be helpful to predict toxicity and survival benefit in high-risk STS treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Further validation studies are needed to establish their clinical utility.

Neurodevelopmental disorders have been linked to numerous genes, particularly pathogenic variants in genes encoding postsynaptic scaffolding proteins, like SHANK3. This study aims to provide insights into the cardiovascular profile of patients with pathogenic SHANK3 variants, expanding beyond the well-established associations with neurodevelopmental disorders and epilepsy. We conducted a prospective study involving patients affected by neurodevelopmental disorders with pathogenic SHANK3 variants. Comprehensive cardiovascular assessments were performed and molecular genetic testing included chromosomal microarray followed by clinical exome sequencing. We identified five patients with de novo SHANK3 variants, all of whom exhibited cardiac involvement, including myocardial dysfunction, congenital heart disease (patent ductus arteriosus), and a case of postictal atrial fibrillation. Our findings emphasize an elevated risk of cardiovascular abnormalities in patients with SHANK3 pathogenic variants compared to prior reports. Despite their young age, these patients displayed significant cardiac abnormalities. The study highlights the necessity of integrating cardiac evaluation and ongoing cardiovascular monitoring into multidisciplinary care, facilitating early detection of heart failure and assessment of the risk of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP). Further research is needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of cardiac manifestations in SHANK3 mutation carriers.

Secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) expression has been proposed as a prognostic and predictive biomarker for some cancer types, but knowledge about the predictive value of SPARC polymorphisms in the context of neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer (BC) is lacking. In 132 HER2-negative BC patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, we determined polymorphisms in the SPARC gene and analyzed their association with outcome. We also determined SPARC protein expression in tumor tissue. SPARC rs19789707 was significantly associated with response to treatment according to the Miller and Payne system in the breast (multivariate: odds ratio (OR), 3.81; p = 0.028). This association was significant in the subgroup of patients with luminal tumors (univariate: p = 0.047). Regarding survival, two SPARC variants showed significant associations with event-free survival: the rs19789707 variant in the subgroup of luminal A tumors (univariate: p = 0.006), and the rs4958487 variant in the subgroup of luminal B tumors (univariate: p = 0.022). In addition, SPARC rs4958487, rs10065756, and rs12153644 were significantly correlated with SPARC protein expression. Our findings suggest that SPARC polymorphisms could be good predictors of treatment response and survival in BC patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, especially those with luminal tumors.

Molecular factors influencing prognosis in leiomyosarcomas (LMS) remain poorly understood. Given that LMS arise from smooth muscle and that the dystrophin gene (DMD) has been suggested as a tumor suppressor in this tumor type, this study investigated dystrophin expression and somatic mutations in DMD, and dystrophin–glycoprotein complex (DGC) and dysferlin (DYSF) coding genes as prognostic biomarkers in LMS. Seventy-seven patients with LMS were retrospectively included in the study. Dystrophin expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. The presence of DMD point mutations were determined using next-generation sequencing (NGS), and DMD copy-number variants were assessed by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique. Low dystrophin expression was observed in 66% of tumors and showed a nominal association with tumor grade, with 76% of grade 3, 58% of grade 2, and 33% of grade 1 tumors showing low dystrophin expression (p = 0.046). Dystrophin expression was not associated with overall survival (OS), nor with recurrence-free survival (RFS) in localized cases or progression-free survival (PFS) in metastatic cases. However, dystrophin expression was significantly associated with shorter OS (p = 0.006) and RFS (p = 0.003) in patients with localized grade 2 tumors. Mutations in DMD, DGC-coding genes and DYSF were identified in 59% of tumors, but no significant associations were found with pathological, molecular, or survival data. Loss of dystrophin expression was common in LMS tumors and was associated with high-grade tumors in our cohort. Nonetheless, the role of dystrophin as a prognostic biomarker of survival was only observed in patients with localized grade 2 tumors in this exploratory, hypothesis-generating study, and therefore needs further validation.