Introduction Structural reorganisation of the synovium with expansion of fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLS) and influx of immune cells is a hallmark of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Activated FLS are increasingly recognised as a critical component driving synovial tissue remodelling by interacting with immune cells resulting in distinct synovial pathotypes of RA. Methods Automated high-content fluorescence microscopy of co-cultured cytokine-activated FLS and autologous peripheral CD4⁺ T cells from patients with RA was established to quantify cell–cell interactions. Phenotypic profiling of cytokine-treated FLS and co-cultured T cells was done by flow cytometry and RNA-Seq, which were integrated with publicly available transcriptomic data from patients with different histological synovial pathotypes. Computational prediction and knock-down experiments were performed in FLS to identify adhesion molecules for cell–cell interaction. Results Cytokine stimulation, especially with TNF-α, led to enhanced FLS-T cell interaction resulting in cell-cell contact-dependent activation, proliferation and differentiation of T cells. Signatures of cytokine-activated FLS were significantly enriched in RA synovial tissues defined as lymphoid-rich or leucocyte-rich pathotypes, with the most prominent effects for TNF-α. FLS cytokine signatures correlated with the number of infiltrating CD4⁺ T cells in synovial tissue of patients with RA. Ligand-receptor pair interaction analysis identified ICAM1 on FLS as an important mediator in TNF-mediated FLS-T cell interaction. Both, ICAM1 and its receptors were overexpressed in TNF-treated FLS and co-cultured T cells. Knock-down of ICAM1 in FLS resulted in reduced TNF-mediated FLS-T cell interaction. Conclusion Our study highlights the role of cytokine-activated FLS in orchestrating inflammation-associated synovial pathotypes providing novel insights into disease mechanisms of RA.

Objectives Patients under rituximab therapy are at high risk for a severe COVID-19 disease course. Humoral immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination are vastly diminished in B-cell-depleted patients, even after a third vaccine dose. However, it remains unclear whether these patients benefit from a fourth vaccination and whether continued rituximab therapy affects antibody development. Methods In this open-label extension trial, 37 rituximab-treated patients who received a third dose with either a vector or mRNA-based vaccine were vaccinated a fourth time with an mRNA-based vaccine (mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2). Key endpoints included the humoral and cellular immune response as well as safety after a fourth vaccination. Results The number of patients who seroconverted increased from 12/36 (33%) to 21/36 (58%) following the fourth COVID-19 vaccination. In patients with detectable antibodies to the spike protein’s receptor-binding domain (median: 8.0 binding antibody units (BAU)/mL (quartiles: 0.4; 13.8)), elevated levels were observed after the fourth vaccination (134.0 BAU/mL (quartiles: 25.5; 1026.0)). Seroconversion and antibody increase were strongly diminished in patients who received rituximab treatment between the third and the fourth vaccination. The cellular immune response declined 12 weeks after the third vaccination, but could only be slightly enhanced by a fourth vaccination. No unexpected safety signals were detected, one serious adverse event not related to vaccination occurred. Conclusions A fourth vaccine dose is immunogenic in a fraction of rituximab-treated patients. Continuation of rituximab treatment reduced humoral immune response, suggesting that rituximab affects a second booster vaccination. It might therefore be considered to postpone rituximab treatment in clinically stable patients. Trial registration number 2021-002348-57.

Objectives A third COVID-19 vaccination is recommended for immunosuppressed patients. However, data on immunogenicity and safety of a third COVID-19 vaccination in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) are sparse and therefore addressed within this clinical trial. Methods 60 immunosuppressed patients and 48 healthy controls (HCs) received a third vaccination with an mRNA vaccine. The primary endpoint was defined as the presence of antibody levels against the receptor-binding domain (RBD)>1500 BAU/mL in patients with IMIDs versus HCs. Further endpoints included differences in neutralising antibodies and cellular immune responses after the third vaccination. Reactogenicity was recorded for 7 days, and safety was evaluated until week 4. Results Rate of individuals with anti-RBD antibodies>1500 BAU/mL was not significantly different after the third vaccination between patients with IMIDs and HCs (91% vs 100% p=0.101). Anti-RBD and neutralising antibody levels were significantly lower in patients with IMIDs after the third vaccination than in HCs (p=0.002 and p=0.016, respectively). In contrast, fold increase in antibody levels between week 0 and 4 was higher in patients with IMIDs. Treatment with biological (b) disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD) or combination of bDMARDs and conventional synthetic DMARDs was associated with reduced antibody levels. Enhanced cellular immune response to wild type and Omicron peptide stimulation was observed after the third vaccination. No serious adverse event was attributed to the third vaccination. Conclusion Our clinical trial data support the immunogenicity and safety of a third COVID-19 vaccination in patients with IMIDs. However, effects of DMARD therapy on immunogenicity should be considered. Trial registration number EudraCT No: 2021-002693-10.

Objectives Osteoclasts (OCs) are myeloid-derived multinucleated cells uniquely able to degrade bone. However, the exact nature of their myeloid precursors is not yet defined. Methods CD11c-diphtheria toxin receptor (CD11cDTR) transgenic mice were treated with diphtheria toxin (DT) or phosphate buffered saline (PBS) during serum transfer arthritis (STA) and human tumour necrosis factor transgenic (hTNFtg) arthritis and scored clinically and histologically. We measured cytokines in synovitis by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). We performed ovariectomy in CD11cDTR mice treated with PBS or DT. We analysed CD11cDTR, CD11c-Cre/CX3CR1-STOP-DTR and Zbtb46-DTR-treated mice with DT using histomorphometry and OC of CD11c and Zbtb46 fate reporter mice by fluorescent imaging. We sorted murine and human OC precursors and stimulated them with macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) and receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL) to generate OCs. Results Targeting CD11c⁺ cells in vivo in models of inflammatory arthritis (STA and hTNFtg) ameliorates arthritis by reducing inflammatory bone destruction and OC generation. Targeting CD11c-expressing cells in unchallenged mice removes all OCs in their long bones. OCs do not seem to be derived from CD11c⁺ cells expressing CX3CR1⁺, but from Zbtb46⁺conventional dendritic cells (cDCs) as all OCs in Zbtb46-Tomato fate reporter mice are Tomato⁺. In line, administration of DT in Zbtb46-DTR mice depletes all OCs in long bones. Finally, human CD1c-expressing cDCs readily differentiated into bone resorbing OCs. Conclusion Taken together, we identify DCs as important OC precursors in bone homeostasis and inflammation, which might open new avenues for therapeutic interventions in OC-mediated diseases.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is characterized by immune dysregulation, including alterations in peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) populations and aberrant cytokine signaling. Methotrexate (MTX) is the preferred first-line treatment for RA, yet its precise mechanisms of action remain incompletely understood. This study employed a multi-omics strategy—combining single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and immunophenotyping—to identify key effector peripheral immune cells and their cellular responses in RA patients over 12 weeks of MTX treatment. In our study, MTX was associated with significant immune modulation, including the restoration of naïve T and B cells and reductions in T cell memory subsets with these effects detectable as early as three weeks post-treatment. Plasmablast levels also emerged as a potential biomarker for early therapeutic response, reflecting MTX’s impact on immune homeostasis. Transcriptional analysis revealed modulation of key pathways, including TNF-α signaling, B cell receptor signaling, and T cell receptor-mediated apoptosis. Network analysis identified critical regulatory hubs, such as EGR1, JAK2, and SOCS1, in monocytes and CD4 memory T cells, highlighting these cell types as key mediators of MTX’s effects. In conclusion, these findings advance our understanding of MTX’s effects on immune cell dynamics at different stages of treatment, showing for the first time the early cellular changes leading to immune modulation in RA. Altogether, our results provide the foundation for further mechanistic investigations into MTX.

Objectives and design To further elucidate the effects of rare systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARD) and their treatment on antibody development after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2, we compared patients with and without immunosuppressive therapy to healthy controls in an observational cohort study. Participants and setting We enrolled 52 patients with SARD and 72 healthy subjects in a prospective, observational study at the Medical University of Vienna and measured the humoral response 6 months after two mRNA vaccinations and 2–6 weeks after a third dose. Results Patients with vasculitis showed significantly (p=0.02) lower antibody titres 6 months after vaccination (median 247 BAU/mL, IQR [185–437]), as compared with healthy controls (median 514 BAU/mL, [185–437], IQR 323; 928, vasculitis patients: 247, IQR [185; 437], p<0.05). Patients receiving 2–3 immunomodulatory medications showed significantly lower antibody levels. Of note, all patients with SARD, even those without immunomodulatory medication, developed lower antibody levels after the third dose compared with healthy controls (median 22 630, IQR [16 945; 43 200] in HC, 9510 IQR [3866; 14 215] in patients without immunosuppressive treatment (p<0.001), 7780 IQR [2203; 15 645] in patients receiving a single immunomodulatory drug (p<0.0001) and 14 320 IQR [2415; 35 400] in patients receiving combination therapy (p=0.081)). Conclusions Patients with SARD displayed lower antibody development after booster vaccination, even if antibody levels after two immunisations were comparable to healthy controls. Our data may be limited due to sample size, but it provides pointers for a more individualised, antibody-titre-oriented approach and earlier booster vaccination in patients with SARD.