Marko Jurišić

Mr. Marko Jurišić


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2023 in Cybernetics and Information Technologies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MJMarko Jurišić
Marko Jurišić
ITIgor Tomičić
Igor Tomičić
Petra GrdPetra Grd
Petra Grd
The rise of online transactions has led to a corresponding increase in online criminal activities. Account takeover attacks, in particular, are challenging to detect, and novel approaches utilize machine learning to identify compromised accounts. This paper aims to conduct a literature review on account takeover detection and user behavior analysis within the cybersecurity domain. By exploring these areas, the goal is to combat account takeovers and other fraudulent attempts effectively.

30 June 2026 in Signals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MJMarko Jurišić
Marko Jurišić
ITIgor Tomičić
Igor Tomičić
Andrija BernikAndrija Bernik
Andrija Bernik
User Behaviour Analytics (UBA) relies heavily on sequential data to detect anomalies such as insider threats. Traditional approaches often model user behaviour as discrete sequences of events using Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) like Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks. These methods implicitly treat time steps as uniform, ignoring the irregular time intervals inherent in user logs. In this paper, we present the first application of Neural Controlled Differential Equations (NCDEs) to user behaviour analytics, a class of continuous-time models that naturally handle irregularly-timed event data. We compare a simple LSTM predictor against an NCDE predictor on the CERT 4.2 and 6.2 insider threat dataset. We demonstrate that standard discrete-time models (LSTMs) produce noisy loss signals on sparse data, forcing downstream classifiers to rely on fragile error spikes. In contrast, Neural CDEs generate stable, continuous error signals. NCDE roughly tripled the F1 of the discrete baseline (0.364 vs. 0.133) on the challenging CERT 6.2 dataset.