This is a prospective and comparative study including 76 consecutive patients performing EUS-FNB for pancreatic and extrapancreatic solid lesions, randomized by alternate allocation to macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE) (40 patients) or to a conventional technique (40 patients), with three passes each. MOSE samples were differentiated into score 0: no visible material, score 1: only necrotic or haematic material, score 2: white core tissue ≤ 2 mm, or score 3: white core tissue > 2 mm. The conventional technique consisted in pushing all the needle content into a test tube for evaluation by the pathologist. In both groups, a 22–25 Gauge Franseen-tip needle (Acquire, Boston Scientific Co., Natick, MA, USA) was used. The study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy and adequacy of MOSE compared to the conventional technique and whether MOSE could optimize the number of passes during EUS-FNB. Results: The analysis was performed on 76 patients (38 MOSE, 38 conventional). The overall diagnostic adequacy was 94.7% (72/76) and accuracy was 84.2% (64/76). The diagnostic accuracy was similar in the two groups: MOSE 86.8% (33/38 lesions), vs. conventional 81.6%, 31/38 lesions, p = 0.76). Regarding diagnostic adequacy, the MOSE technique was 97.4% (111/114 passes) compared to 92.1% (105/114 passes) with the conventional technique, p = 0.06. The accuracy increased according to the MOSE score evaluation: it was 43.5%, 65.5% and 78.3% in patients with score 1, score 2, and score 3, respectively. Moreover, if in the first two passes the MOSE score was 2 or 3, the accuracy was 82.6% (20/23), and upon adding a third pass, the accuracy increased to 87% (20/23), which was not significantly different from the general accuracy of the MOSE samples (86.8%) (p = 0.86). Conclusions: The MOSE score showed a comparable diagnostic accuracy to the conventional technique. However, MOSE allows endoscopists to perform an inspective evaluation of the material, tends to perform better than the conventional technique in terms of diagnostic adequacy, and may potentially reduce the number of passes.

We report a 78-year-old man presenting with persistent headaches in vertex and temporo-parietal area; fatigue, worsening after walking; jaw claudication; scotomas; pharyngodynia; and dry cough after the second dose of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (ChAdOx1-S) administration. Laboratory findings showed an elevated C-reactive protein level and FDG-CT PET showed evidence of active large vessel vasculitis with diffuse abnormal artery uptake. Under suspicion of vasculitis, a temporal arteries biopsy was performed; the histopathologic findings demonstrated the transmural inflammatory infiltrate with giant cells, compatible with giant cell arteritis. Although the overall incidence of vaccine-triggered autoimmunity is low, rheumatologists worldwide should be aware of autoimmune diseases as a new potential adverse event of vaccines.

Objective: Our objectives were to describe molecular profiling in a real-life cohort of patients with radioiodine-resistant (RAI-R) differentiated or poorly differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC or PDTC) treated with lenvatinib and to focus on factors potentially influencing the quality of tissue samples for molecular analysis, including the impact of storage time, defined as the interval between tissue collection and molecular testing. Design: We retrospectively included all lenvatinib-treated RAI-R DTC or PDTC patients tested with DNA- and/or RNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) in our center, also analyzing the results of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for RET fusions if the sample did not satisfy quality criteria for RNA-based NGS analysis. We investigated differences in terms of histotype, biopsy site, or storage time between adequate and inadequate samples for RNA-based NGS. Results: At least one gene alteration was detected in 50% of the cohort (18 out of 36 patients); RAS and BRAF were the most frequent mutations, while gene fusions accounted for 5.6% of cases. Tissue samples were more frequently adequate for DNA-based NGS compared to RNA-NGS analysis (93.9% vs. 58.3%, p < 0.001). The median storage time was significantly longer in the case of inadequate samples for RNA-based NGS compared with adequate specimens (41.5 vs. 9.5 months, p = 0.016); samples archived for ≥3 years led more frequently to an inadequate result. Conclusions: Advanced RAI-R TC candidates for systemic therapy often harbor gene alterations. An adequate result was less frequently achieved in cases of RNA-based NGS than in DNA-based NGS, especially if the interval between tissue collection and molecular analysis was longer; nevertheless, the limited cohort size precludes definitive conclusions.