Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) such as e‐cigarettes and heated tobacco products are novel battery‐operated devices that deliver nicotine without combustion of tobacco. Because cigarette smoking is sustained by nicotine addiction and the toxic combustion products are mainly responsible for the harmful effects of smoking, ENDS could be used to promote smoking cessation while exposing users to lower levels of toxicants compared with conventional cigarettes. The currently available evidence from clinical and observational studies indicates a potential role of e‐cigarettes as smoking cessation aids, although many continue to use e‐cigarettes long after quitting smoking. Nicotine and toxicant delivery vary considerably by device and depend on the characteristics of the e‐liquid formulation. Because smokers tend to titrate their nicotine intake to maintain their desired pharmacologic effects, device and liquid characteristics need to be considered when using ENDS as an aid to quit smoking. Factors potentially limiting their use are the currently still unknown long‐term safety of these products and concerns regarding widespread use among youth. Implications of clinical pharmacology data on ENDS for the cigarette endgame and regulation by the U.S. Food and Drug administration are discussed.

New psychoactive substances (NPS) have emerged worldwide in recent years, posing a threat to public health and a challenge to drug policy. NPS are usually derivatives or analogues of classical recreational drugs designed to imitate their effects while circumventing regulations. This article provides an overview of benefits and limitations of analytical screening in managing patients presenting with acute NPS toxicity. NPS typically cannot be analytically identified with the usual immunoassay tests. To detect NPS using an immunoassay, antibodies specifically binding to the new structures would have to be developed, which is complicated by the rapid change of the NPS market. Activity‐based assays could circumvent this problem since no prior knowledge on the substance structure is necessary. However, classical recreational drugs activating the same receptors could lead to false positive results. Liquid or gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry is a valuable NPS analysis tool, but its costs (e.g. equipment), run time (results usually within hours vs minutes in case of immunoasssays) and the need for specialized personnel hinder its use in clinical setting, while factors such as lack of reference standards can pose further limitations. Although supportive measures are sufficient in most cases for adequate patient management, the detection and identification of NPS can contribute significantly to public health and safety in cases of e.g. cluster intoxications and outbreaks, and to the investigation of these novel compounds' properties. However, this requires not only availability of the necessary equipment and personnel, but also collaboration between clinicians, authorities and laboratories.

The consequences of mushroom poisoning range from mild, mostly gastrointestinal, disturbances to organ failure or even death. This retrospective study describes presentations related to mushroom poisoning at an emergency department in Bern (Switzerland) from January 2001 to October 2017. Gastrointestinal disturbances were reported in 86% of the 51 cases. The National Poisons Information Centre and mycologists were involved in 69% and 61% of the cases, respectively. Identification of the mushroom type/family was possible in 43% of the cases. The most common mushroom family was Boletaceae (n = 21) and the most common mushrooms Xerocomus chrysenteron (n = 7; four being part of a cluster), Clitocybe nebularis, Lepista nuda and Lactarius semisanguifluus (n = 5 each, four being part of a cluster). Poisonous mushrooms included Amanita phalloides (n = 3, all analytically confirmed), Boletus satanas (n = 3), Amanita muscaria (n = 2) and Amanita pantherina (n = 2). There were no fatalities and 80% of the patients were discharged within 24 h. Mushroom poisoning does not appear to be a common reason for emergency consultation and most presentations were of minor severity and related to edible species (e.g., due to incorrect processing). Nevertheless, poisonous mushrooms and severe complications were also recorded. Collaboration with a poison centre and/or mycologists is of great importance, especially in high risk cases.

The aim of the study was to compare self-reported and analytically confirmed substance use in cases of acute recreational drug toxicity. We performed a retrospective analysis of emergency department presentations of acute recreational drug toxicity over 2 years (October 2013 to September 2015) within the European Drug Emergencies Network Plus project. Among the 10,956 cases of acute recreational drug toxicity during the study period, 831 could be included. Between the self-reported substance use and the toxicological results, the highest agreement was found for heroin (86.1%) and cocaine (74.1%), whereas inhalants, poppers, and magic mushrooms were self-reported but not analytically detected. Cathinones and other new psychoactive substances (NPS) could be detected using additional analytical methods. Among cases with both immunoassay (IA) and confirmation with mass spectrometry (MS), the results were consistent for methadone (100%) and cocaine (95.5%) and less consistent for amphetamines (81.8%). In cases with a positive IA for amphetamines (n = 54), MS confirmed the presence of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), amphetamine, methamphetamine, and NPS in 37, 20, 10, and 6 cases, respectively, also revealing use of more than 1 substance in some cases. MS yielded positive results in 21 cases with a negative IA for amphetamines, including amphetamine, MDMA, methamphetamine, and NPS, in 14, 7, 2, and 2 cases, respectively. In conclusion, the highest agreement was found between self-reports and analytical findings for heroin and cocaine. The diagnosis of NPS use was mainly based on self-report. The IAs accurately identified methadone and cocaine, and MS had advantages for the detection of NPS and amphetamine derivatives.

Popular “pod-style” e-cigarettes commonly use nicotine salt-based e-liquids that cause less irritation when inhaled and can deliver higher nicotine concentrations than free-base nicotine. This study investigated the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of different nicotine formulations (salt vs. free-base) and concentrations that might influence systemic nicotine absorption and appeal of e-cigarettes. In this randomized, double-blind, within-subject crossover study, 20 non-nicotine-naïve participants were switched among three e-liquids (free-base nicotine 20 mg/mL, nicotine salt 20 mg/mL, nicotine salt 40 mg/mL) using a refillable pod system and a standardized vaping protocol (one puff every 30 seconds, 10 puffs total). Serum nicotine concentrations and vital signs were assessed over 180 minutes; direct effects, craving, satisfaction, withdrawal, and respiratory symptoms were measured using questionnaires. CYP2A6 genotypes and the nicotine metabolite ratio were also assessed. Eleven (55%) participants were male and the median age was 23.5 years (range 18–67). All three formulations differed significantly in peak serum nicotine concentration (baseline adjusted C_max, median (range): 12.0 ng/mL (1.6–27.3), 5.4 ng/mL (1.9–18.7), and 3.0 ng/mL (1.3–8.8) for nicotine salt 40 mg/mL, nicotine salt 20 mg/mL and free-base 20 mg/mL, respectively). All groups reached C_max 2.0–2.5 minutes (median) after their last puff. Differences in subjective effects were not statistically significant. No serious adverse events were observed. Free-base 20 mg/mL formulations achieved lower blood nicotine concentrations than nicotine salt 20 mg/mL, while 40 mg/mL nicotine salt yielded concentrations similar to cigarette smoking. The findings can inform regulatory policy regarding e-liquids and their potential use in smoking cessation. Nicotine salt formulations inhaled by an e-cigarette led to higher nicotine delivery compared to nicotine-free-base formulations with the same nicotine concentration. These findings should be considered in future regulatory discussions. The 40 mg/mL nicotine salt formulation showed similar nicotine delivery as combustible cigarettes, albeit at concentrations over the maximum limit for e-liquids allowed in the European Union. Nicotine delivery resembling combustible cigarettes might be beneficial for smokers willing to quit to adequately alleviate withdrawal symptoms. However, increased nicotine delivery can also pose a public health risk, raising concerns about abuse liability, especially among youth and nonsmokers.