Journal of Medical Internet Research - International Scientific Journal for Medical Research, Information and Communication on the Internet

Mounting evidence of loneliness and negative health impacts has placed loneliness among the "geriatric giants" in need of intervention by the healthcare system. To evaluate the literature regarding the health impact of loneliness among older adults living in congregate living settings (i.e., assisted living, nursing homes). Five databases were searched for quantitative and qualitative studies from January 1990 through August 2021. Methodological quality was assessed using modified criteria specific to quantitative and qualitative studies. Dual review assured the quality of the systematic review conduct. Five qualitative, 3 mixed method, 19 cross-sectional, and 4 cohort articles were eligible. Despite different tools used to measure loneliness, loneliness appeared common among older residents in congregate living situations. In most studies, loneliness was associated with depression (regardless of scale used), albeit all but one came from cross-sectional studies. Few studies noted the association between loneliness and suicidal ideation and frailty. The three cohort studies that evaluated loneliness and mortality had mixed results. Resilience and activities appeared to mediate the association between loneliness and negative health outcomes and social support appeared to moderate associations. For older adults living in congregate long term care settings, loneliness is a common phenomenon, with cross-sectional studies suggesting links to depression, suicidal ideation, and frailty. Additional longitudinal studies to understand the impact of loneliness on health outcomes in older adults living in congregate settings are needed, as are rigorous evidence-based interventions to address loneliness and mitigate its harmful effects during life's final chapter.

Purpose: Limited English proficiency adversely impacts people's ability to access health services. This study examines the association between English language proficiency and insurance access and use of a usual care provider after the implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Methods: Using cross-sectional data from the 2016 Medical Panel Expenditures Survey, we identified 24,099 adults (weighted n=240,035,048) and categorized them by self-reported English-language proficiency. We classified participants according to responses to: “How well do you speak English? Would you say… Very well; well; Not well; Not at all?” (having limited English proficiency: not well; not at all, English proficient: well; very well; and English only: not applicable) and “What language do you speak at home? Would you say… English, Spanish, Other.” Using these two recoded variables, we created a variable with five categories: (1) Spanish speaking, with limited English proficiency, (2) other language speaking, with limited English proficiency, (3) Spanish speaking, English proficient, (4) other language speaking, English proficient, and (5) English only. Health insurance and usual care provider were determined by self-report. Results: Among those <65 years, the percent covered by public insurance (Spanish: 21%, Other languages: 28%, English only 14%), who were uninsured (Spanish: 46%, Other languages: 17%, English only: 8%), and who lacked a usual care provider (Spanish: 45%, Other languages: 35%, English only: 26%) differed by English language proficiency. Among those ≥65 years, fewer people with limited English proficiency relative to English only were dually covered by Medicare and private insurance (Spanish: 12%, Other languages: 15%, English only: 59%), and a higher percent lacked a usual care provider (Spanish: 15%, Other languages: 11%, English only: 7%). Differences persisted with adjustment for covariates. Conclusion: Post the ACA, persons with limited English proficiency remain at a risk of being uninsured relative to those who only speak English.