Jacqueline Knapke

Dr. Jacqueline Knapke

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 March 2024 in British Journal of Biomedical Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JKJacqueline Knapke
Jacqueline Knapke
LHLaura Hildreth
Laura Hildreth
JMJennifer R. Molano
Jennifer R. Molano
SSStephanie M. Schuckman
Stephanie M. Schuckman
JBJason T. Blackard
Jason T. Blackard
AMAngela Mendell
Angela Mendell
This study is the first to apply the theoretical principles of Malcolm Knowles’ theory of andragogy to evaluate data collected from learners who participated in team science training workshops in a biomedical research setting. Briefly, andragogy includes six principles: the learner’s self-concept, the role of experience, readiness to learn, orientation to learning, the learner’s need to know, and intrinsic motivation. Using an embedded study design, the primary focus was on qualitative data, with quantitative data complementing the qualitative findings. The deductive analysis demonstrated that approximately 85% of the qualitative data could be connected to at least one andragogical principle. Participant responses to positive evaluation questions were largely related to two principles: readiness to learn and problem-based learning orientation. Participant responses to negative questions were largely connected to two different principles: the role of experience and self-direction. Inductive analysis found an additional theme: meeting biological needs. Quantitative survey results supported the qualitative findings. The study findings demonstrate that andragogy can serve as a valuable construct to integrate into the development of effective team science training for biomedical researchers.

3 June 2022 in Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JKJacqueline Knapke
Jacqueline Knapke
DSDenise C. Snyder
Denise C. Snyder
KCKaren Carter
Karen Carter
MFMeredith B. Fitz-Gerald
Meredith B. Fitz-Gerald
JFJessica Fritter
Jessica Fritter
CJCarolynn T. Jones
Carolynn T. Jones
Background: Identification of evidence-based factors related to status of the clinical research professional (CRP) workforce at academic medical centers (AMCs) will provide context for National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS) policy considerations and guidance. The objective of this study is to explore barriers and opportunities related to the recruitment and retention of the CRP workforce. Materials and Methods: Qualitative data from a series of Un-Meeting breakout sessions and open-text survey questions were analyzed to explore barriers and recommendations for improving AMC CRP recruitment, retention and diversity. Results: While certain institutions have established competency-based frameworks for job descriptions, standardization remains generally lacking across CTSAs. AMCs report substantial increases in unfilled CRP positions leading to operational instability. Data confirmed an urgent need for closing gaps in CRP workforce at AMCs, especially for attracting, training, retaining, and diversifying qualified personnel. Improved collaboration with human resource departments, engagement with principal investigators, and overcoming both organizational and resource challenges were suggested strategies, as well as development of outreach to universities, community colleges, and high schools raising awareness of CRP career pathways. Discussion: Based on input from 130 CRP leaders at 35 CTSAs, four National Institute of General Medical Sciences' Institutional Development Award (IDeA) program sites, along with industry and government representatives, we identified several barriers to successful recruitment and retention of a highly trained and diverse CRP workforce. Results, including securing institutional support, champions, standardizing and adopting proven national models, improving local institutional policies to facilitate CRP hiring and job progression point to potential solutions.

6 September 2013 in Clinical and Translational Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JKJacqueline Knapke
Jacqueline Knapke
JTJoel Tsevat
Joel Tsevat
PSPaul A. Succop
Paul A. Succop
KDKpandja Djawe
Kpandja Djawe
PKPierce Kuhnell
Pierce Kuhnell
EHErin N. Haynes
Erin N. Haynes

6 November 2014 in Clinical and Translational Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JKJacqueline Knapke
Jacqueline Knapke
EHErin N. Haynes
Erin N. Haynes
PKPierce Kuhnell
Pierce Kuhnell
JTJoel Tsevat
Joel Tsevat

8 June 2021 in Higher Education Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JKJacqueline Knapke
Jacqueline Knapke
SSStephanie M. Schuckman
Stephanie M. Schuckman
RLRebecca C. Lee
Rebecca C. Lee

16 December 2016 in Online Learning
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JKJacqueline Knapke
Jacqueline Knapke
EHErin Haynes
Erin Haynes
JBJulie Breen
Julie Breen
PKPierce Kuhnell
Pierce Kuhnell
LSLaura Smith
Laura Smith
JMJareen Meinzen-Derr
Jareen Meinzen-Derr
In the last two decades, online learning has transformed the field of higher education. Also during this time, institutions of higher education have seen increases in their adult learner populations. The flexibility and accessibility of an online education model is often particularly appealing to adult learners, who bring unique needs, expectations, and learning styles to their educational experiences. Using Kolb’s Learning Style Inventory and Knowles’ andragogy model as theoretical frameworks, this study evaluates an online graduate course in epidemiology in terms of the demographics, learning styles, satisfaction, and achievement of students. Comparing the online course to the same, land-based course that was offered concurrently, we found no differences between students’ learning styles, satisfaction, and overall achievement. However, students in the land-based class were more likely to be matriculated into a degree program (p