Background: Solitary use of substances is a risk factor for substance use-related mortality. Novel e-health harm reduction interventions such as virtual overdose monitoring services (VOMS) have emerged in North America to improve access to emergency overdose support for people who use substances (PWUS). To date, little research has been published, and the perspectives of PWUS are needed to inform evaluation and policy efforts. Objective: To explore the beliefs, values and perceptions of PWUS around using and accessing VOMS in Canada. Methods: A qualitative study following grounded theory methodology was conducted. Using existing peer networks, purposive and snowball sampling was conducted to recruit PWUS (≥ 18 years) with previous experience with VOMS. Thematic analysis was used to analyze twenty-three interviews. Several methods were employed to enhance rigor, such as independent data coding and triangulation. Results: Twenty-three one-on-one telephone interviews of PWUS with previous experience with VOMS were completed and analyzed. The following themes emerged: (1) feelings of optimism around VOMS to save lives; (2) privacy/confidentiality was highly valued due to stigma and fear of arrest; (3) concerns with reliable cell phones negatively impacting VOMS uptake; (4) concerns around emergency response times, specifically in rural/remote communities; (5) desire for trusting relationships with VOMS operators; (6) importance of mental health supports and referrals to psychosocial services; and (7) possible limited uptake due to low public awareness of VOMS. Conclusion: This qualitative study provided novel insights about the VOMS from the perspectives of PWUS. PWUS generally felt optimistic about the potential of VOMS as a suitable harm reduction intervention, but several potential barriers around accessing VOMS were identified that may limit uptake. Future research is warranted.

Overdose response technology or virtual overdose response services are an evolving complementary harm reduction intervention which may overcome certain accessibility barriers of physical supervised consumption sites (SCS) and overdose prevention sites (OPS). We sought to characterize SCS/OPS accessibility barriers among clients accessing a nationwide overdose response phone-based hotline in Canada. We performed a retrospective cohort analysis using anonymized call logs of the National Overdose Response Service (NORS) between December 2020 to July 2023. De-identified caller locations were cross-referenced with the locations, policies and operational hours of existing physical SCS/OPS. The primary outcome was accessibility of physical SCS/OPS defined hierarchically according to alignment with caller postal code, substance use routes reported, and calling times. Our cohort comprised 4501 calls from 331 unique clients. Despite always having nearby SCS/OPS open and supporting substance use routes of choice, 100 clients (30.2%) preferentially utilized NORS. Among 191 clients (57.7%) who never had access to physical SCS/OPS at time of calling, 92 (27.8%) lacked a nearby site, 58 (17.5%) called outside of operational hours, and 41 (12.4%) would not be permitted to smoke on premises. Secondary analyses identified correlations between accessibility and the urbanicity and geographical region of callers within Canada. Overdose response technology or virtual overdose response services are a novel complementary harm reduction strategy both for clients with access barriers to physical SCS/OPS and those who prefer virtual services. System-level correlates of client location urbanicity and inter-provincial variation indicate actionable targets for expanding harm reduction services both physical and virtual to better engage with people who use drugs. Health Canada Substance Use and Addictions Program, 10.13039/501100000024 Canadian Institutes of Health Research , and Grenfell Ministries.

The National Overdose Response Service (NORS) is a Canadian mobile or virtual overdose response hotline intended to prevent drug overdose deaths but has unexpectedly received mental health related calls, including adverse mental health events. Our study aimed to examine these occurrences and caller characteristics predictive of adverse mental health outcomes. Using the NORS call dataset, we conducted a descriptive representation of mental health occurrences and mental health emergencies along with correlative statistics. We found that NORS had received 2518 mental health calls, with 28 (1.1%) being adverse events. Men, rural callers, polyroute substance consumption and history of overdosing were found to have increased odds of having an adverse mental health event, while being from Quebec, using non-standard consumption routes and using the line between 50 and 99 times were found to decrease odds. This supports the utility of overdose prevention hotlines to also support people experiencing adverse mental health situations and reduce harm for individuals with mental health and/or substance use disorders.

Objectives: In 2021, opioid-related deaths have increased by 96% and continue to be higher than prepandemic levels. In particular, women and gender-diverse individuals face numerous challenges when assessing harm reduction supports, including physical supervised consumption sites, compared with male counterparts. Mobile overdose response services (MORSs) including overdose response hotlines and phone-based overdose response applications are novel virtual overdose response technologies that may help mitigate this issue. This study aims to explore how women and gender-diverse individuals engage with and perceive these services. Methods: A qualitative study using grounded theory was conducted. Using existing peer networks and purposive and snowball sampling between March and July 2023, 19 semistructured interviews were conducted with women and gender-diverse individuals in Canada who have lived experience using substances. NVivo was used for thematic analysis, which continued until saturation was reached. Results: The interviews elucidated the following 5 themes: Overdose response hotlines and applications were generally preferred over supervised consumption sites due to (1) perceived gender-based safety; (2) better accommodation for mothers concerned with stigma, childcare, and child welfare systems; and (3) eased accessibility for those involved in sex work. It was also noted that (4) judgment-free spaces and trauma-informed care provided by staff with lived experiences were invaluable, and (5) decriminalization of illicit substances will encourage uptake of these harm reduction services. Conclusion: This study found that women and gender-diverse individuals felt positively toward overdose response hotlines and applications with the potential to fill a need in providing harm reduction services that create feelings of safety, support roles of motherhood and sex work, and generate nonstigmatizing spaces.

Background: Mental health and substance use disorders typically onset during youth and commonly co-occur. Integrated treatment of two or more co-existing mental health and substance use disorders (i.e., concurrent disorders) is increasingly prevalent in real-world clinical settings. However, the depth of the evidence base on best practices remains unclear. Objectives: This scoping review aimed to identify, map and summarize peer-reviewed studies of interventions for concurrent disorders in youth. Methods: Six electronic health databases were systematically searched, in addition to a hand search of the reference lists of relevant systematic reviews. Only peer-reviewed studies of interventions treating concurrent disorders (i.e., simultaneous treatment of two or more disorders) in youth (10–29 years old) were eligible. Two independent reviewers conducted screening and data extraction. Results were charted according to studies employing pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions. Results: Thirty peer-reviewed studies were included, 19 (63.3%) were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Most studies enrolled participants with an unspecified substance use disorder (n=17, 56.7%), while alcohol use was the primary substance use disorder in seven (23.3%) studies, followed by cannabis use disorder in six (20.0%) studies. Mood disorders (e.g., depression, dysthymia) were the most common concurrent mental health disorders comprising 15 (50%) studies, followed by nine (30.0%) studies of behavioural disorders (e.g., ADHD) and five (16.7%) studies of unspecified psychiatric disorders. Eighteen (60.0%) studies (n=1,699 participants) investigated the effectiveness of various non-pharmacological interventions, while 12 (40.0%) studies examined pharmacotherapies (n=765 participants). Conclusion: Although several RCTs were identified, substantial clinical and methodological heterogeneity was evident among the studies (e.g., patients with multiple disorders, and multi-faceted interventions). Smaller systematic reviews focused on specific interventions (e.g., behavioural therapies) and concurrent disorders (e.g., depression and substance use) may be warranted. Due to considerable heterogeneity, more RCTs are needed before conducting larger systematic reviews or meta-analyses. Plain Language Summary Title: Evidence-based interventions for youth with concurrent mental health and substance use disorders: A scoping review