Background/Objectives: Primary-care access in Alberta, Canada, is shaped by geography, attachment, timeliness, continuity, and local service capacity. Rural communities may face travel burden, workforce fragility, and intermittent services, whereas suburban communities may have nearby facilities but still experience delayed access, low attachment, and fragmented episodic care. Rural Wyoming has some similar geographic and workforce constraints, although the jurisdictions differ in financing, regulation, and pharmacist scope. This systematic review and narrative synthesis examined evidence on coordinated community pharmacist–family physician care in rural and suburban Alberta and considered, separately, the contextual relevance of the findings to rural Wyoming and comparable frontier settings. Methods: We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library using controlled vocabulary and free-text terms to identify English-language peer-reviewed studies and practice-relevant evidence published from 1 January 2010 to 19 April 2026. Two authors screened titles/abstracts and full texts and resolved decisions by consensus. Methodological appraisal used design-appropriate Critical Appraisal Skills Programme criteria, and outcome-level certainty was considered using GRADE domains. Results: Thirty-four eligible peer-reviewed or practice-evaluation records were included in the narrative synthesis, and seven official contextual or methodological sources supported jurisdictional interpretation. Evidence was strongest for hypertension, cardiovascular risk reduction, medication management, and chronic disease monitoring. No included study directly compared the same intervention in Alberta and Wyoming; evidence for emergency-department effects and equivalent effectiveness across settings was limited. Conclusions: Coordinated pharmacist–family physician care may extend access to selected medication-related and chronic disease services when supported by documentation, referral, follow-up, and red-flag protocols. Application to Wyoming should be treated as a context-dependent proposition requiring local adaptation and prospective evaluation, not as demonstrated transferability or a substitute for physician-led longitudinal primary care.

Background/Objectives: Western Canadian and US communities beyond urban centres are routinely underserved by primary, specialist, and emergency care services, whether based in rural, remote, frontier or Indigenous settings. Access issues in these contexts have traditionally been framed by distance, weather, and clinician availability challenges, but also extend to specialist maldistribution, attachment gaps and uneven broadband availability. This systematic review and narrative evidence synthesis scoped the impact of telehealth and other virtual-care models on rural access to services, broadly construed to include timely access, travel burden, specialist input, emergency support, continuity and clinician support, safety, and equity, or impacts on service fairness and effectiveness. Methods: Searches conducted in May 2026 included PubMed/MEDLINE-indexed records, PubMed Central full-text records, the Cochrane Library search interface, publisher platforms, reference chasing, and official sources from Canadian and US health systems. Eligible evidence from 1 January 2016 through 6 May 2026 addressed rural, remote, frontier, Indigenous, underserved, western or northern health-service settings, with earlier landmark sources retained for historical framing where relevant. Results: The search identified 112 records; after de-duplication and screening, 28 eligible peer-reviewed records were included in the evidence synthesis and 7 official sources informed jurisdictional contextualization. Evidence supported virtual care as an access extender in contexts where it can reduce travel, enable specialist input or support rural clinicians, maintain continuity of chronic disease or mental health follow-up. Virtual care is best when paired with on-site physical assessment and in-person escalation pathways. Evidence was weaker for virtual-only models, and for durable effects on emergency department use. Conclusions: Telehealth should therefore be implemented as a hybrid, locally anchored, culturally safe access model rather than as a stand-alone substitute for rural primary care or specialist capacity.

Background/Objectives: Primary care access in Alberta, Canada is dictated by geography, attachment, timeliness, continuity, and local service burdening. Physician and primary care delivery in rural communities are subject to travel burden, workforce fragility, and intermittency, while suburban communities have immediate proximity to facilities, but are also challenged by delayed access, low attachment, and fragmented episodic care. These access challenges are echoed in rural and frontier contexts in the United States including the state of Wyoming. In this systematic review and narrative synthesis we investigated if and how care coordination between community pharmacists and family physicians, increases primary care access in rural and suburban Alberta, and how transferable those findings are to rural Wyoming and other similar frontier settings. Methods: We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library using controlled vocabulary and free-text terms to identify English-language peer-reviewed studies and practice-relevant evidence published from 1 January 2010 to 19 April 2026 related to primary care access, rural, suburban and frontier settings, Alberta, Wyoming, community pharmacy, pharmacist prescribing, physician-pharmacist collaboration, medication management, chronic disease care, continuity, and emergency department use. Earlier landmark primary-care, physician-pharmacist collaboration, and medication-safety studies were retained only when necessary for conceptual framing. Results: We screened 34 eligible records for inclusion in the narrative synthesis, and seven official contextual sources were included for jurisdictional interpretation. Strong evidence demonstrates that pharmacists are accessible primary care extenders where community services are coordinated with family physicians through documentation, referral pathways, red-flag protocols, and shared medication plans. The strongest evidence is specific to hypertension, cardiovascular risk reduction, and medication management and chronic disease monitoring. Direct Alberta-Wyoming comparative intervention evidence is limited. Conclusions: Physician-pharmacist coordinated care should be implemented prospectively as a geographically tailored access model, not a physician replacement model, with evaluation of access, continuity, medication safety, emergency department use and equity.

Background/Objectives: Registered nurse (RN) prescribing can improve timely access to care, but only when the education, authorization process, and workplace supports match the clinical responsibility being given to the nurse. This policy and practice analysis compares Alberta, Canada, with Aotearoa New Zealand, with particular attention to New Zealand registered nurse prescribers in primary health and specialty teams and to RN prescribing as a possible bridge to nurse practitioner (NP) readiness. Methods: We reviewed publicly available legislation, regulator standards, educational frameworks, professional guidance, and institutional information from Alberta/Canada and Aotearoa New Zealand. We also use the publicly described Cranston Ridge Medical Clinic RN Prescriber Internship as an illustrative family-medicine model. No patient, staff, trainee, or private programme data were collected. Results: Alberta permits eligible RNs, when authorized by the College of Registered Nurses of Alberta, to prescribe Schedule 1 drugs, except controlled drugs and substances, and to order common diagnostic tests within a specific practice setting and location. New Zealand uses a postgraduate, practicum-based designated-prescriber pathway for registered nurse prescribers in primary health and specialty teams, with ongoing requirements for prescribing-related professional development and prescribing practice. New Zealand also embeds registered nurse prescribing programme outcomes within NP education standards. Conclusions: Alberta appears to have an enabling legal architecture, but current implementation is site-specific and not formally linked to NP education. We propose a hybrid Alberta-New Zealand-CRMC model built around portable regulator-recognised RN-prescriber authorization, postgraduate prescribing sciences, supervised family-medicine entrustment, employer onboarding, and formal bridging into NP education. The model is presented for policy debate and future evaluation, not as an already tested outcome intervention.