Tomer Shushi

Dr. Tomer Shushi

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2016 in Insurance: Mathematics and Economics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZLZinoviy Landsman
Zinoviy Landsman
Udi MakovUdi Makov
Udi Makov
TSTomer Shushi
Tomer Shushi

1 November 2016 in Insurance: Mathematics and Economics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZLZinoviy Landsman
Zinoviy Landsman
Udi MakovUdi Makov
Udi Makov
TSTomer Shushi
Tomer Shushi

1 July 2018 in Insurance: Mathematics and Economics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZLZinoviy Landsman
Zinoviy Landsman
Udi MakovUdi Makov
Udi Makov
TSTomer Shushi
Tomer Shushi

27 July 2022 in Quantum Studies: Mathematics and Foundations
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YAYakir Aharonov
Yakir Aharonov
FCF. Colombo
F. Colombo
AJA. N. Jordan
A. N. Jordan
ISI. Sabadini
I. Sabadini
TSTomer Shushi
Tomer Shushi
JTJ. Tollaksen
J. Tollaksen
The aim of this paper is to study a class of superoscillatory functions in several variables, removing some restrictions on the functions that we introduced in a previous paper. Since the tools that we used with our approach are not common knowledge we will give detailed proof for the case of two variables. The results proved for superoscillatory functions in several variables can be further extended to supershifts in several variables.

11 January 2016 in Quanta
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YAYakir Aharonov
Yakir Aharonov
Eliahu CohenEliahu Cohen
Eliahu Cohen
TSTomer Shushi
Tomer Shushi
Retrocausal models of quantum mechanics add further weight to the conflict between causality and the possible existence of free will. We analyze a simple closed causal loop ensuing from the interaction between two systems with opposing thermodynamic time arrows, such that each system can forecast future events for the other. The loop is avoided by the fact that the choice to abort an event thus forecasted leads to the destruction of the forecaster's past. Physical law therefore enables prophecy of future events only as long as this prophecy is not revealed to a free agent who can otherwise render it false. This resolution is demonstrated on an earlier finding derived from the two-state vector formalism, where a weak measurement's outcome anticipates a future choice, yet this anticipation becomes apparent only after the choice has been actually made. To quantify this assertion, weak information is described in terms of Fisher information. We conclude that an already existing future does not exclude free will nor invoke causal paradoxes. On the quantum level, particles can be thought of as weakly interacting according to their past and future states, but causality remains intact as long as the future is masked by quantum indeterminism. Quanta 2016; 5: 53–60.

9 January 2017 in European Actuarial Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TSTomer Shushi
Tomer Shushi