Total ammoniacal nitrogen (TAN) is considered to be a pollutant, but is also a versatile resource. This review presents an overview of the TAN recovery potentials from nitrogen (N)-loaded residual streams by discussing the sources, recovery technologies and potential applications. The first section of the review addresses the fate of TAN after its production. The second section describes the identification and categorisation of N-loaded (≥0.5 g L-1 of reduced N) residual streams based on total suspended solids (TSS), chemical oxygen demand (COD), total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN), TAN, and TAN/TKN ratio. Category 1 represents streams with a low TAN/TKN ratio (1 g L-1) that require a decrease of the TSS prior to TAN recovery, whereas category 3 represents streams with a high TAN/TKN ratio (≥0.5) and low TSS (≤1 g L-1) that are suitable for direct TAN recovery. The third section focuses on the key processes and limitations of AD, which is identified as a suitable technology to increase the TAN/TKN ratio by converting organic-N to TAN. In the fourth section, TAN recovery technologies are evaluated in terms of the feed composition tolerance, the required inputs (energy, chemicals, etc.) and obtained outputs of TAN (chemical form, concentration, etc.). Finally, in the fifth section, the use of recovered TAN for three major potential applications (fertilizer, fuel, and resource for chemical and biochemical processes) is discussed. This review presents an overview of possible TAN recovery strategies based on the available technologies, but the choice of the recovery strategy shall ultimately depend on the product characteristics required by the application. The major challenges identified in this review are the lack of information on enhancing the conversion of organic-N into TAN by AD, the difficulties in comparing the performance and required input of the recovery technologies, and the deficiency of information on the required concentration and quality of the final TAN products for reuse.
Ammonium (NH4+) can be recovered from water for fertiliser production or even energy production purposes. Because NH4+ recovery is more effective at increased concentrations, electrodialysis (ED) can be used to concentrate NH4+ from side streams, such as sludge reject water, and simultaneously achieve high NH4+ removal efficiencies. However, the effect of osmosis and back-diffusion increases when the NH4+ concentration gradient between the diluate and the concentrate stream increases, resulting in a limitation of the concentration factor and an increase in energy consumption for NH4+ removal. In this study, we showed that operation at dynamic current density (DCD) reduced the effect of osmosis and back-diffusion, due to a 75% decrease of the operational run time, compared to operation at a fixed current density (FCD). The concentration factor increased from 4.5 for an FCD to 6.7 for DCD, while the energy consumption of 90% NH4+ removal from synthetic sludge reject water at DCD remained stable at 5.4 MJ·kg-N-1.
The environmental management of highly saline coal mine wastewater presents a critical challenge for European mining regions, particularly under the constraints of the EU Water Framework Directive. This study presents a cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment of a novel zero liquid discharge (ZLD) system developed under the EU-funded LIFE Brine-Mining project and deployed at the Ziemowit mine in Poland. The system was designed to treat coal mine brine (TDS ~80 g/L) and recover valuable resources, including high-purity water, sodium chloride, magnesium hydroxide, calcium carbonate, and calcium sulphate. The assessment was conducted in accordance with EN 15804 using the Environmental Footprint v3.1 methodology, ecoinvent v3.10, and a functional unit of 1 m3 of saline wastewater inflow, covering all life cycle stages from raw material extraction to end-of-life and resource recovery (Module D). The results indicate a fossil-based global warming potential of 73.86 kg CO2 eq. per functional unit, with 66% attributed to operational electricity consumption (module B6, 44 kWh/m3) and 29% to auxiliary chemical consumption (module B1). Three key environmental hotspots were identified: module B1 dominates ozone depletion potential (67%), module B6 dominates acidification potential (66%), and raw material extraction (module A1) dominates abiotic depletion of minerals and metals (43%). Resource recovery credits (Module D) offset 11.80 kg CO2 eq. of GWP-fossil, cause the ADP-minerals and metals indicator to become net negative, and reduce the water deprivation potential by approximately 50%. A sensitivity analysis confirmed that results are robust to ±10% variations in wastewater inflow, with GWP-total varying within a narrow −0.5% to +0.6% range once the volume-proportional nature of chemical and electricity consumption is correctly accounted for. These findings provide a quantitative sustainability baseline for the scale-up and replication of integrated ZLD technologies in the European mining sector, demonstrating that circular brine treatment can simultaneously address regulatory water quality targets, reduce primary resource consumption, and deliver measurable environmental credits aligned with EU circular economy and sustainable development objectives.