Fatma Nur Özkömeç

Dr. Fatma Nur Özkömeç

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 March 2022 in RSC Advances
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DIDaniel Kasungi Isika
Daniel Kasungi Isika
FÖFatma Nur Özkömeç
Fatma Nur Özkömeç
MÇMustafa ÇEŞME
Mustafa ÇEŞME
OSOmowunmi Sadik
Omowunmi Sadik
This study reports the synthesis and characterization of a novel class of flavonoid acetamide derivatives (FA) of quercetin, apigenin, fisetin, kaempferol, and luteolin. Flavonoids display numerous biological properties but are limited by aqueous insolubility, enzymatic degradation, instability, and low bioavailability. FAs were synthesized, with 80–82% yields, through the sequential modification of the flavonoid hydroxyl groups into the acetamide moieties. Bioavailability, antioxidant, and ADMET are structure–activity-dependent properties that vary across different classes of flavonoids and dictate the prevalent biological applications of the flavonoids. Thus, the FAs were evaluated for their bioavailability, antioxidant, and ADMET toxicity properties versus the unmodified flavonoids (UFs). In vitro bioavailability analysis shows that the UFs have bio-availabilities in the range of 10.78–19.29% against that of the FAs in the range of 20.70–34.87%. The antioxidant capacity was measured using the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH·) assay with recorded IC50 values of 2.19–13.03 μM for the UFs. Conversely, the FAs had high DPPH IC50 values ranging from 33.83 to 67.10 μM and corresponding to lower antioxidant activity. The FAs showed favorable ADMET properties. The modification of flavonoids into FAs significantly improves the bioavailability and the ADMET toxicity properties, albeit with decreased antioxidant activity. This work highlights the effect of the global modification of the flavonoids with the acetamide groups on the bioavailability, antioxidant, and ADMET toxicity properties which are critical determinants in the biological applications of the flavonoids.

20 July 2022 in Journal of Molecular Structure
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TYTuncay Yeşilkaynak
Tuncay Yeşilkaynak
FÖFatma Nur Özkömeç
Fatma Nur Özkömeç
MÇMustafa ÇEŞME
Mustafa ÇEŞME
RDRuken Esra Demirdöğen
Ruken Esra Demirdöğen
EKEmine Kutlu
Emine Kutlu
FEFatih Mehmet Emen
Fatih Mehmet Emen

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ÜÖÜnal Öztürk
Ünal Öztürk
EKErgül Belge Kurutaş
Ergül Belge Kurutaş
NÜNuray Üremiş
Nuray Üremiş
MÜMuhammed Mehdi Üremiş
Muhammed Mehdi Üremiş
FÖFatma Nur Özkömeç
Fatma Nur Özkömeç
Background/Objectives: The G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) is known to interact with cellular stress responses and DNA damage pathways. Therefore, exposure to ionizing radiation may modulate the biological consequences of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the GPR30 gene. This study aims to evaluate the association between GPER polymorphisms and radiation sensitivity. Methods: The study included 50 healthcare workers exposed to ionizing radiation and 36 healthy individuals with no known occupational exposure to radiation. Genomic DNA was isolated and PCR products were purified using GeneAll kits. Genomic regions encompassing three GPER single-nucleotide polymorphisms (rs3808350, rs3808351, and rs11544331) were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), followed by DNA sequencing analysis using the BigDye Cycle Sequencing Kit. In addition, an in silico functional and clinical annotation of rs11544331 was performed using Ensembl VEP, SIFT, PolyPhen-2, AlphaMissense, CADD, UniProt, and ClinVar. Results: Genotypic, dominant, and allelic analyses revealed no significant association between radiation exposure and the rs3808350 or rs3808351 polymorphisms. In contrast, a statistically significant association was observed for rs11544331. The frequency of individuals carrying the CT and TT genotypes (CT + TT) was significantly higher in the ionizing radiation-exposed group compared with the control group (OR = 2.981; 95% CI: 1.106–7.904; p = 0.0241). In allelic analysis, the T allele was more prevalent in the exposed group and was significantly associated with radiation exposure (OR = 2.959; 95% CI: 1.282–6.606; p = 0.0110). In silico analysis confirmed that rs11544331 corresponds to the p.Pro16Leu substitution in GPER1; however, SIFT, PolyPhen-2, AlphaMissense, CADD, and ClinVar consistently indicated a tolerated, benign, likely benign, or low-deleteriousness profile. Conclusions: GPER-mediated stress responses and genetic polymorphisms may play a potential role in determining genetic susceptibility following exposure to ionizing radiation.