Purpose: We aimed to investigate the knowledge and awareness level of osteoporosis, its risk factors, the possible causes of underdiagnosis, as well as the preventive measures and lifestyle behavior of the Romanian population.Patients and methods: A non-interventional, cross-sectional study was performed, consisting of an in-person survey, in 10 pharmacies located in both urban and rural settings in Romania. The survey was distributed to patients ≥40 years old.Results: Of 189 respondents, 78.8% were women, the majority age group being 60–69 (31.7%) and 50–59 (30.7%) years old and coming from urban areas (69.3%). Although 75.1% of participants declared knowing about osteoporosis, having a moderate level of knowledge, and women being more aware of the pathology, 77.3% have never performed a DXA test. Moreover, participants already diagnosed with osteoporosis did not show a better disease knowledge than those without a diagnosis. Nearly half of the respondents did not know that a family history of the disease increases the risk of developing it and 60% of them thought that symptoms may develop before a fracture occurs. The preventive strategies tend to be disregarded and thus, underused. Moreover, 42.9% of participants reported being diagnosed with osteoporosis, do not undergo treatment, although they are aware of the existence of effective strategies. The dataset was used to build a participant compatibility network. The network’s clustering revealed six relevant communities, which are not correlated with questionnaire results but reflect the patterns of feature associations.Conclusion: Preventive and therapeutic osteoporosis education programs are urgently needed in the Romanian population to decrease disability and high mortality risks and thus, to improve the quality of life.

Background/Objectives: Osteoporosis represents a major yet underdiagnosed public health concern in developing countries, including Tunisia. Limited awareness, delayed diagnosis, and suboptimal adoption of preventive strategies contribute to increased risk of fragility fractures in aging populations. This study aimed to assess post-pandemic knowledge, attitudes, and preventive practices regarding osteoporosis in the Tunisian general population. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted between February and April 2024 in six randomly selected community pharmacies in Tunis. Adults ≥ 40 years old completed a validated 31-item questionnaire assessing socio-demographic factors, osteoporosis knowledge, risk factors, screening practices, and preventive behaviors. A total of 160 fully completed questionnaires were analyzed using SPSS v22. Results: Only 60.6% of respondents reported awareness of osteoporosis. Knowledge levels were significantly higher in men (8.37 vs. 7.40; p = 0.043), urban residents (8.22 vs. 7.21; p = 0.036), participants with higher education (8.73 vs. 7.00; p < 0.001), those with a family history (8.58 vs. 7.49; p = 0.033), and individuals already diagnosed (9.19 vs. 7.63; p = 0.025). Screening rates were low: only 11.3% had ever undergone DXA testing, despite 18.8% reporting prior fractures. Preventive behaviors were inadequate: 80% did not supplement calcium, 88.1% did not use vitamin D, and 58.8% did not engage in <30 min of daily activity. Osteoporosis was reported by 13.1% of participants and 95.2% of diagnosed cases received treatment, predominantly bisphosphonates (75%). Comorbidities were significantly associated with osteoporosis (24.5% vs. 7.5%; p = 0.003). Conclusions: This study reveals suboptimal awareness, limited access to screening, and insufficient preventive behaviors regarding osteoporosis in Tunisia. Targeted educational initiatives, expansion of DXA availability, adoption of national osteoporosis guidelines, and multidisciplinary stakeholder involvement are critical to improve early detection, prevention, and management in the aging Tunisian population. Furthermore, promoting balanced nutrition that includes calcium- and vitamin D-rich foods, along with appropriate dietary supplementation when needed, is an essential preventive strategy to support optimal bone health and reduce osteoporosis risk in the general population.

Background: Osteoporosis is increasingly understood as a complex population health condition shaped by interacting behavioral, metabolic, pharmacological, and healthcare system determinants rather than isolated skeletal risk factors. However, comparative studies integrating these dimensions across distinct healthcare and sociocultural settings remain scarce. We aimed to characterize cross-national differences in osteoporosis-related risk clustering between Romanian and Tunisian adults using an integrative multidimensional framework. Methods: We performed a comparative cross-sectional analysis of harmonized data from two pharmacy-based studies conducted in Romania and Tunisia, including adults aged ≥ 40 years (n = 349). Osteoporosis-related knowledge, lifestyle and metabolic risk factors, pharmacological exposures, preventive behaviors, and treatment patterns were assessed. Multivariable regression and mediation analyses were used to identify independent predictors of screening uptake and to evaluate the relationship between knowledge and preventive behavior. An exploratory cumulative preventive deficit score was used to estimate overall preventive burden within the pharmacy-based study sample. Results: Romanian participants demonstrated significantly higher osteoporosis knowledge than Tunisian participants (8.90 ± 2.20 vs. 7.83 ± 2.99; p < 0.001); however, knowledge was not independently associated with Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) uptake and did not mediate country-related differences in screening behavior. Compared with the Romanian cohort, the Tunisian cohort exhibited lower DXA screening rates (11.2% vs. 22.8%; p = 0.005), lower vitamin D supplementation (11.9% vs. 38.6%; p < 0.001), greater sedentary behavior, and a significantly higher cumulative preventive deficit burden (3.39 ± 1.08 vs. 2.77 ± 1.26; p < 0.001). Medication-related osteoporosis risk was also greater in Tunisia, particularly due to markedly higher corticosteroid exposure (7.5% vs. 0.5%; p = 0.002). Despite this less favorable preventive profile, the treatment gap among participants with diagnosed osteoporosis was significantly lower in Tunisia than in Romania (4.8% vs. 42.9%; p = 0.003). Conclusions: Distinct but convergent osteoporosis-related risk patterns were identified across the two populations, suggesting that osteoporosis vulnerability emerges through context-specific clustering of behavioral, pharmacological, and healthcare-access determinants rather than through isolated risk factors alone. The dissociation between knowledge and preventive behavior highlights the limited impact of awareness-based strategies when structural barriers remain unaddressed. These findings support a shift toward integrated, population-tailored osteoporosis prevention models that incorporate healthcare-system, medication-related, and behavioral determinants, in addition to conventional educational approaches.