Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized primarily by motor symptoms, including bradykinesia, rigidity, and resting tremor, and is frequently accompanied by a spectrum of non-motor manifestations suchThe Genetic Landscape of Parkinson's Disease: Current Advances and Persistent GapsThe genetic architecture of PD encompasses both rare, high-penetration variants in genes such as SNCA, LRRK2, PINK1, PRKN, and DJ-1, and common, low-effect polymorphisms identified through GWAS approaches (Blauwendraat et al., 2020). While pathogenic mutations in LRRK2 and GBA account for a fraction of familial and sporadic PD cases, many risk-associated variants lie within noncoding regions, modulating gene expression through subtle regulatory mechanisms (Ito;Utsunomiya-Tate, 2023).Recent studies reinforce the importance of SNCA polymorphisms, especially rs356165, rs356219, and rs11931074, across populations, although their effect sizes differ by ancestry (Mohammadi et al., 2025). Such variability likely reflects differences in linkage disequilibrium structure, chromatin organization, and DNA methylation landscapes, suggesting that epigenetic regulation of SNCA may be ancestry-dependent. Despite these findings, most data originate from European cohorts, whose data dominate GWAS repositories and meta-analyses. Consequently, the transferability of these results to admixed genomes, such as those found in Latin American, African, or South Asian populations, remains highly uncertain (Saffie Awad et al., 2024;Saffie Awad et al., 2025). Santos-Lobato et al. (2021) highlighted this paradox in their review. For example, in Brazil, one of the world's most genetically diverse nations (Nunes et al., 2025), only 3.2% of PD patients screened had identifiable monogenic mutations, and population admixture was rarely analyzed (Santos-Lobato et al., 2021). Countries with the richest ancestral diversity thus contribute the least to genetic discovery, while results from homogeneous European samples are often generalized to the entire human population. This imbalance undermines the promise of precision medicine in PD. PRSs derived from European datasets commonly lack reproducibility in non-Europeans and in admixed populations. For instance, LRRK2 p.G2019S, prevalent among Ashkenazi Jews and North African Arabs, exhibits low frequency in East Asians but displays variable penetrance in Latin American cohorts. Similarly, GBA variants, critical risk modifiers, show heterogeneous effects across ancestries, influenced by background haplotypes and local selective pressures (Claudino dos Santos et al., 2024).Populations such as those in Brazil, Colombia, Mexico, and South Africa represent unique genetic mosaics that can shed light on novel biological pathways and protective mechanisms. The persistent underrepresentation of these groups perpetuates misclassification of variants and diagnostic uncertainty. Understanding allele frequencies, linkage patterns, and gene-environment interactions within these populations could refine pathogenicity assessments and enable more accurate genetic counseling. Moreover, epigenetic plasticity within SNCA intronic regions, varying by ancestry, may influence transcriptional dynamics and disease onset, further demonstrating that diversity is not optional but essential for comprehensive genomic interpretation (Sharma et al., 2019).A compelling illustration of the consequences of underrepresentation comes from another disease, transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR) (Bharaj et al., 2025). As discussed by Bharaj et al. (2025), the TTR V122I variant, carried by approximately 3.4% of African Americans, was long neglected in cardiogenetic research due to Eurocentric sampling. Only when African ancestry populations were investigated did the variant's pathogenic role in heart failure become evident, ultimately leading to the development of targeted therapies such as Tafamidis. This case demonstrates how inclusion can drive therapeutic innovation when diversity is integrated into discovery pipelines: new biological pathways emerge, and medical inequities begin to narrow. We see that a similar transformation is needed in the context of PD (Bharaj et al., 2025).Expanding genetic studies to underrepresented and admixed populations could reveal ancestry-specific modulators of α-synuclein aggregation, lysosomal function, or mitochondrial dynamics, all of which are central to neurodegeneration. Countries with mixed ancestries serve as natural laboratories for exploring gene-environment interactions. For example, the Brazilian population's heterogeneous admixture, predominantly European in the South, mixed African and Indigenous in the North and Northeast, mirrors global genetic variation and offers a fertile ground for trans-ancestral mapping. Yet, as reported by Santos-Lobato et al. (2021), fewer than 100 Brazilian PD patients have been genetically characterized to date.Incorporating such populations would refine PRS calibration and variant interpretation. A variant labeled as "pathogenic" in a European cohort may be benign, or even protective, in an admixed genome. Without ancestry-adjusted databases, clinical misinterpretations are inevitable, perpetuating inequities in diagnosis and access to treatment. Thus, expanding PD genomics to include underrepresented populations is not merely an act of inclusion, it is a scientific necessity for the validity and global applicability of genetic medicine.The lack of diversity in PD genetic research remains a significant barrier to advancing the field (Schumacher-Schuh et al., 2022). More than 75% of participants in PD GWAS are of European ancestry, while fewer than 4% represent African, Latin American, or Asian, other than Chinese, ancestry. This imbalance has deep ethical and scientific implications, influencing not only the interpretation of genetic risk but also how diagnostic and therapeutic tools are developed and implemented...