Timothy John Stait-Gardner

Dr. Timothy John Stait-Gardner

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 November 2012 in Molecular Neurobiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MKMustafa S. Kassem
Mustafa S. Kassem
JLJim Lagopoulos
Jim Lagopoulos
TSTimothy John Stait-Gardner
Timothy John Stait-Gardner
WPWilliam Price
William Price
TCTariq W. Chohan
Tariq W. Chohan
MBMaxwell R. Bennett
Maxwell R. Bennett

1 March 2008 in Journal of Magnetic Resonance
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GZGang Zheng
Gang Zheng
TSTimothy John Stait-Gardner
Timothy John Stait-Gardner
PKP.G. Anil Kumar
P.G. Anil Kumar
ATAllan M. Torres
Allan M. Torres
WPWilliam Price
William Price

2 November 2018 in Journal of Comparative Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DHDaniel Hoops
Daniel Hoops
EDEster Desfilis
Ester Desfilis
JUJeremy F. P. Ullmann
Jeremy F. P. Ullmann
AJAndrew L. Janke
Andrew L. Janke
TSTimothy John Stait-Gardner
Timothy John Stait-Gardner
JKJ. Scott Keogh
J. Scott Keogh

11 March 2014 in Polymer Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ADAlexander E. Dunn
Alexander E. Dunn
DDDouglas J. Dunn
Douglas J. Dunn
AMAlexander Macmillan
Alexander Macmillan
RWRenee Whan
Renee Whan
TSTimothy John Stait-Gardner
Timothy John Stait-Gardner
Cyrille BoyerCyrille Boyer
Cyrille Boyer
P(DEGMA-co-OEGMA-b-[TMSPMA-co-VBA])@silica@magnetite polymer–nanoparticle composites have been developed as a platform for controllable drug release. The nanocomposite facilitates controllable release of therapeutic molecules through breakage of pH and heat labile Schiff base bonds that bind the molecules to the polymer. This enables dual-stimuli responsive drug release in response to the acidic microenvironment of cancerous cells and heat generated by the magnetite nanoparticles when subjected to an alternating magnetic field, thereby permitting spatial and temporal control over ‘burst’ release of the drugs. The nanocomposite has also been shown to be effective at improving magnetic resonance imaging contrast through enhancement of spin–spin relaxivity.

5 September 2017 in Brain, Behavior and Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DHDaniel Hoops
Daniel Hoops
MVMarta Vidal-García
Marta Vidal-García
JUJeremy F.P. Ullmann
Jeremy F.P. Ullmann
AJAndrew L. Janke
Andrew L. Janke
TSTimothy John Stait-Gardner
Timothy John Stait-Gardner
JKJ. Scott Keogh
J. Scott Keogh
The brain plays a critical role in a wide variety of functions including behaviour, perception, motor control, and homeostatic maintenance. Each function can undergo different selective pressures over the course of evolution, and as selection acts on the outputs of brain function, it necessarily alters the structure of the brain. Two models have been proposed to explain the evolutionary patterns observed in brain morphology. The concerted brain evolution model posits that the brain evolves as a single unit and the evolution of different brain regions are coordinated. The mosaic brain evolution model posits that brain regions evolve independently of each other. It is now understood that both models are responsible for driving changes in brain morphology; however, which factors favour concerted or mosaic brain evolution is unclear. Here, we examined the volumes of the 6 major neural subdivisions across 14 species of the agamid lizard genus Ctenophorus (dragons). These species have diverged multiple times in behaviour, ecology, and body morphology, affording a unique opportunity to test neuroevolutionary models across species. We assigned each species to an ecomorph based on habitat use and refuge type, then used MRI to measure total and regional brain volume. We found evidence for both mosaic and concerted brain evolution in dragons: concerted brain evolution with respect to body size, and mosaic brain evolution with respect to ecomorph. Specifically, all brain subdivisions increase in volume relative to body size, yet the tectum and rhombencephalon also show opposite patterns of evolution with respect to ecomorph. Therefore, we find that both models of evolution are occurring simultaneously in the same structures in dragons, but are only detectable when examining particular drivers of selection. We show that the answer to the question of whether concerted or mosaic brain evolution is detected in a system can depend more on the type of selection measured than on the clade of animals studied.

1 September 2013 in Journal of Magnetic Resonance
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BMBenjamin F. Moroney
Benjamin F. Moroney
TSTimothy John Stait-Gardner
Timothy John Stait-Gardner
BGBahman Ghadirian
Bahman Ghadirian
NYNirbhay N. Yadav
Nirbhay N. Yadav
WPWilliam Price
William Price