Lithium-ion batteries (LIB) are widely used in various applications. The LIB degradation curve and, most significantly, the knee-point and End-of-life (EoL) point identification are critical factors for the selection of the appropriate application, such as electric vehicles and stationary energy storage systems, due to their effect on performance and lifespan, safety, and environmental footprint. Linear degradation models can be inaccurate in capturing the highly nonlinear behavior of LIB degradation caused by multiple simultaneous degradation mechanisms. Hence, this work first analyzes the main different mechanisms, their causes, and their interrelations. Secondly, the various single- and multi-mechanism physics-based (PB) and data-driven (DD) models for LIB degradation and knee-point identification are summarized and compared regarding their prediction performance on degradation and transition from stabilized to saturated aging. While single-mechanism PB models can be effective in the LIB first-life prediction, they can seriously undermine the knee-point and saturated aging. Moreover, the modeling of the different aging mechanisms can significantly increase the complexity of the multi-mechanism PB models. Finally, while DD models for LIB degradation have been developed, a DD model focused on knee-point identification and LIB second-life is still missing from the literature.

Low-carbon technologies (LCTs) such as Electric vehicles (EVs), heat pumps (HPs), and PV systems increase phase unbalance due to uneven phase distribution. Phase unbalance can lead to overheating, suboptimal capacity utilization, and power losses. This work analyzes the unbalance impact inflicted by the grid integration of PVs, HPs, and EVs under different combinations and penetration levels. The main novelty of this study is the use of different types of real-world distribution grids (rural, suburban, and urban) for the LCT unbalance impact comparison, while simultaneously considering the influence of several unbalance factors; LCT phase connections and grid distributions, the seasonal effect, and the power and consumption levels, the latter of which have been evaluated as mitigation strategies. The results showed that the combined integration of PVs, EVs, and HPs can cause high voltage unbalance, especially in grids with high existing loading. The seasonal effect was the most impactful unbalance factor, intensifying unbalance by the integration of PVs-HPs and PVs-EVs combinations during Winter and Summer, respectively. Furthermore, reductions in the power and consumption levels of the LCTs decreased the unbalance total violation duration in a range between 11% and 25% for all distribution grids. Reducing the LCT consumption levels also decreased the unbalance magnitude, which reached up to 15% for the urban grid under 100% HP and PV penetration. Finally, it was found that consumption duration enhances unbalance, such as the peak power levels, because it increases the simultaneity of technologies operating in different phases.