Keiki Nagai

Dr. Keiki Nagai

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

1Year (2026-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 August 2026 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KNKeiki Nagai
Keiki Nagai
YKYusuke Kurita
Yusuke Kurita
YFYuji Fujita¹
Yuji Fujita¹
KKKensuke Kubota
Kensuke Kubota
TOTomoki Ogata
Tomoki Ogata
Masato YonedaMasato Yoneda
Masato Yoneda
Background/Objectives: Acute cholecystitis in patients with malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) is challenging to manage. Evidence for endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) using double-pigtail plastic stents (DPPS) in this setting remains limited. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of EUS-GBD using DPPS for acute cholecystitis in patients with MBO. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 41 consecutive patients who underwent EUS-GBD using DPPS at two centers. The primary endpoint was technical success; secondary endpoints included clinical success, adverse events, recurrence, and subsequent oncologic treatment. Results: Technical success was achieved in 95.1% (39/41), with clinical success in all technically successful cases. Adverse events included biliary peritonitis (14.6%) and procedure-related DPPS migration (2.4%). Recurrence occurred in 2.6% of patients. Systemic therapy was resumed in 10 of 18 patients (55.6%) at a median of 15 days after EUS-GBD. Conclusions: EUS-GBD using DPPS achieved high technical and clinical success rates with a low recurrence rate in selected patients with acute cholecystitis and MBO. Systemic therapy could be resumed in a subset of patients following successful drainage. These findings suggest that DPPS-based EUS-GBD may be a feasible internal drainage option in this setting, although prospective comparative studies are needed to further establish its safety and effectiveness.

10 September 2026 in Digestive Endoscopy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NKNoriki Kasuga
Noriki Kasuga
YKYusuke Kurita
Yusuke Kurita
YSYusuke Sekino
Yusuke Sekino
KNKeiki Nagai
Keiki Nagai
YFYuji Fujita¹
Yuji Fujita¹
Masato YonedaMasato Yoneda
Masato Yoneda
Objectives: Endoscopic papillectomy (EP) is a minimally invasive treatment for ampullary tumors; however, its safety in elderly patients remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and clinical outcomes of EP in this population. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included 255 patients with ampullary tumors who underwent EP between April 2008 and September 2025 at three collaborating institutions. Patients aged ≥ 75 years were defined as elderly; complication rates and clinical outcomes were compared with the non‐elderly group. Results: The elderly group had a significantly higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (1.0 [0–8] vs. 0 [0–7]; p = 0.028). The elderly group demonstrated significantly lower rates of overall complications (29.0% vs. 48.9%; p = 0.004), delayed bleeding (4.3% vs. 23.1%; p < 0.001), and pancreatitis (11.6% vs. 23.1%; p = 0.041) than the non‐elderly group. Serious complications rate (4.3% vs. 4.8%; p = 1.000), median hospital stay (12 [7–73] vs. 13 [4–40] days; p = 0.408) were comparable between groups. Multivariate analysis showed that age ≥ 75 years was independently associated with a reduced risk of delayed bleeding ( p = 0.002; odds ratio [OR], 0.14) and pancreatitis ( p = 0.029; OR, 0.39). Conclusions: EP in patients aged ≥ 75 years was associated with lower complication rates and may be a feasible treatment option.