Introduction Suspected preterm labour (SPL) is an obstetric complication that occurs in 9% of all pregnancies and is the leading cause of antenatal hospital admissions. More than half of women with SPL deliver a premature baby which is a known risk factor for developing cardiovascular and metabolic disorders in childhood and later in adult life. On the other hand, the other half of these women will deliver at term, labelled as ‘false preterm labour’. Although this has been thought to be a benign condition, accumulating evidence reported in recent years showed long-term effects for the foetus, neonate and infant even when birth occurs at term. However, the impact of SPL on cardiovascular and metabolic programming has not been studied yet. The aim of this prospective cohort study is to evaluate the impact of SPL on cardiac remodelling and function and on cardiovascular and metabolic profiles independently of gestational age at birth. Methods and analysis Prospective cohort study of subjects exposed and not exposed to an episode of SPL. Women with singleton pregnancies who are admitted at a tertiary hospital due to SPL and matched controls will be recruited. Evaluation of cardiovascular remodelling by foetal echocardiography will be performed during admission. Cord blood will be collected at birth in order to analyse different metabolomic footprints and several cardiovascular and metabolic risk biomarkers. Moreover, children will undergo an echocardiography 6 months after birth. The relationship between SPL and cardiovascular and metabolic programming will be modelled considering different covariates such as socioeconomic factors, perinatal characteristics, lifestyle, diet and exercise. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval was granted in April 2020 from CEIC Aragón (CEICA) (C.P.-C.I. PI20/136). Study outcomes will be disseminated at international conferences and published in peer-reviewed scientific journals. Trial registration number NCT05670665.

Background: SARS-CoV-2 infection has been linked to an increased risk of hypertensive disorders during pregnancy, particularly preeclampsia (PE). As both conditions involve vascular and endothelial dysfunction, a mechanistic overlap has been proposed. This study examines the relationship between maternal COVID-19 and preeclampsia by analyzing inflammatory, endothelial, and angiogenic biomarkers in pregnancies with and without these complications. Methods: A case–control study was conducted, including four groups: healthy pregnancies before 2020 (n = 10), preeclampsia cases before 2020 (n = 10), COVID-19 cases without preeclampsia (n = 10), and COVID-19 cases with preeclampsia (n = 10). The groups were selected to be comparable in terms of gestational age at blood sampling. Biomarkers related to endothelial, inflammatory, and angiogenic pathways were measured. Results: Significant differences in biomarker levels were detected among the four groups. Regarding endothelial damage, sICAM1 levels were significantly higher in the COVID-PE group compared with the COVID-noPE group (p = 0.002). Additionally, vWF (p = 0.006), END1 (p < 0.001), and sVCAM1 (p = 0.030) levels varied significantly across groups. IL8 levels showed significant differences (p < 0.001), and were particularly elevated in preeclampsia cases (preCOVID-PE and COVID-PE groups) compared with controls (p = 0.005 and p < 0.001, respectively). Angiogenic markers sFlt-1, PLGF, and sFlt-1/PLGF exhibited significant group differences (p < 0.001). In contrast, maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection in the absence of preeclampsia was not associated with a significant alteration of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio. Discussion: PE associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection preserved the classical angiogenic signature of preeclampsia, but showed additional endothelial and inflammatory biomarker alterations. These findings support an association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and a distinct endothelial and inflammatory biomarker profile in PE, warranting confirmation in larger prospective studies.