‘Fingerprint’ identification is the key to turquoise provenance studies, but previous studies have met with limited success in China. Turquoises in China mainly occur in altered sedimentary rocks and are formed by weathering, leaching and sedimentation. This paper evaluates the potential for sedimentary environment sensitive elements to be used to distinguish between turquoise deposits in China. In this paper, the ratios of V/Mo, Ce/Ce*, Ni/Co, Sr/Ba, Tl/Ga, Li/Ba and V/Cr were calculated for turquoise of different origins. Our results show that these parameters when used alongside Ga concentration permit effective discrimination between turquoise sources in China. This approach brings to light a new means of analyzing trace element databases and an untapped wealth of information that can be used for future turquoise provenance studies.

The Bastielieke W-polymetallic deposit, located in the Xinjiang Altay metallogenic belt, records a complex hydrothermal history critical to understanding multi-stage metallogenic processes in the southern Altay. This study integrates in situ U-Pb dating of hydrothermal titanite and zircon with textural and compositional analyses of titanite to reconstruct this history. Three types of hydrothermal titanite, identified from pyroxene skarn (TtnI), epidote skarn (TtnII), and quartz–sulfide ore (TtnIII), display dissolution–reprecipitation textures and systematic compositional variations, indicating distinct fluid compositions and origins. TtnI, TtnII, and TtnIII yield U-Pb ages of 244.7 ± 7.8 Ma, 252.4 ± 5.5 Ma, and 250.6 ± 3.0 Ma, respectively, and hydrothermal zircon from pyroxene skarn yields an age of 249.9 ± 2.1 Ma, constraining the hydrothermal event to the latest Permian to Early Triassic. These ages are interpreted to record the timing of U-Pb system resetting during regional shear–thrust movements. Compositional variations among the three titanite types reveal a two-stage hydrothermal history. The earlier stage involved W–Cu mineralization and protolith titanite precipitation related to magmatic–hydrothermal fluids exsolved from Permian granites. The later stage was driven by regional shear–thrust movements and metamorphic–hydrothermal processes, which reset the titanite U-Pb systems, partially altered TtnI and TtnII, precipitated TtnIII, and remobilized metals. This model links the Bastielieke deposit to multi-stage hydrothermal processes and provides insights into similar metallogenic events along the southern margin of Xinjiang Altay.