Aurelia Stefania Domenco

Dr. Aurelia Stefania Domenco


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

1Year (2026-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 June 2026 in Life
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ICIoana-Andreea Cirlig
Ioana-Andreea Cirlig
AOAlexandru Marian Olaru
Alexandru Marian Olaru
MEMihai-Alexandru Ene
Mihai-Alexandru Ene
ADAurelia Stefania Domenco
Aurelia Stefania Domenco
RTRossy Vladut Teica
Rossy Vladut Teica
Ioana Andreea GheoneaIoana Andreea Gheonea
Ioana Andreea Gheonea
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used as a decision-support tool in mammography, but its influence on radiology residents’ interpretive behavior remains insufficiently characterized. This study evaluated the impact of AI assistance on BI-RADS classification and diagnostic confidence among radiology residents. Methods: This retrospective, single-center, multi-reader paired study included 112 diagnostic mammography examinations, corresponding to 223 assessable breasts and 2230 resident-breast readings. Ten radiology residents interpreted 2D mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis examinations first without AI assistance and subsequently with access to AI output. Changes in the BI-RADS category, diagnostic confidence, reasons for modification, and agreement with an expert-consensus BI-RADS reference standard were analyzed. Results: AI-assisted reassessment changed the BI-RADS classification in 9.7% of readings and diagnostic confidence in 19.2%, with any AI-associated modification observed in 24.3% of instances. Upgrades were more frequent than downgrades, particularly for medium- and high-suspicion AI outputs. Confidence increased more often than it decreased. Expert-reference agreement improved modestly, and BI-RADS 4+ sensitivity increased from 72.0% to 82.3%, with stable negative agreement, but these metrics reflect agreement with expert BI-RADS consensus rather than pathology-confirmed cancer detection. Conclusions: AI assistance influenced both BI-RADS reassessment and diagnostic confidence among radiology residents, producing modest but directionally favorable changes. These findings support cautious, supervised integration of AI into breast imaging training, with attention to confidence calibration and potential overreliance.