Fragility fractures are common, affecting almost one in two older women and one in three older men. Every fragility fracture signals increased risk of future fractures as well as risk of premature mortality. Despite the major health care impact worldwide, currently there are few systems in place to identify and “capture” individuals after a fragility fracture to ensure appropriate assessment and treatment (according to national guidelines) to reduce future fracture risk and adverse health outcomes. The Task Force reviewed the current evidence about different systematic interventional approaches, their logical background, as well as the medical and ethical rationale. This included reviewing the evidence supporting cost-effective interventions and developing a toolkit for reducing secondary fracture incidence. This report presents this evidence for cost-effective interventions versus the human and health care costs associated with the failure to address further fractures. In particular, it summarizes the evidence for various forms of Fracture Liaison Service as the most effective intervention for secondary fracture prevention. It also summarizes the evidence that certain interventions, particularly those based on patient and/or community-focused educational approaches, are consistently, if unexpectedly, ineffective. As an international group, representing 36 countries throughout Asia-Pacific, South America, Europe, and North America, the Task Force reviewed and summarized the international data on barriers encountered in implementing risk-reduction strategies. It presents the ethical imperatives for providing quality of care in osteoporosis management. As part of an implementation strategy, it describes both the quality improvement methods best suited to transforming care and the research questions that remain outstanding. The overarching outcome of the Task Force's work has been the provision of a rational background and the scientific evidence underpinning secondary fracture prevention and stresses the utility of one form or another of a Fracture Liaison Service in achieving those quality outcomes worldwide. © 2012 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Osteoporotic vertebral fractures are, as the hip fractures, associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Norway has one of the highest reported incidences of hip fractures in the world. Because of methodological challenges, vertebral fractures are not extensively studied. The aim of this population based study was to describe, for the first time, the age- and sex specific occurrence of osteoporotic vertebral fractures in Norway.

The level of recognition and treatment of osteoporosis is not well characterized in primary care. In data from a large sample of postmenopausal women attending 927 primary care physicians, 29% of women reported one or more fractures after menopause. The great majority (72%) were not on any osteoporosis-specific therapy. Introduction: Osteoporosis is often first recognized at the time of a low-trauma fracture. However, by this stage, the risk of subsequent fractures has already risen substantially. Moreover, in many countries, only a small proportion of women, who have already sustained fractures, receive a treatment shown to reduce this increased risk of further fractures. Materials and Methods: This project was initiated to examine the prevalence of osteoporotic fractures, risk factors for osteoporosis, and use of antifracture therapy among postmenopausal Australian women. More than 88,000 women from 927 primary care physicians returned over 69,358 surveys. Of these, 57,088 reported the presence of a postmenopausal fracture or risk factors. Results: Among these randomly selected postmenopausal women, 29% reported having had one or more low-trauma fractures after menopause (44% substantiated in current records). One-third of these women reported multiple fractures. The prevalence of all types of fractures, except rib and ankle, increased with age and low body weight. Those who reported fractures were also more likely to report early menopause, corticosteroid use, and a family history of osteoporosis. Moreover, those with vertebral fractures were more likely to record height loss, kyphosis, and back pain. Physical inactivity, low calcium intake, and smoking had no consistent relationship with any fracture outcome. Of the women who reported a fracture after menopause, only 28% were on any specific therapy for osteoporosis, and 7% were on calcium alone. Of those who had been told they had osteoporosis by a doctor, 40% were receiving specific osteoporosis therapy. Conclusions: In this large study of postmenopausal Australian women attending primary care physicians, 29% reported at least one low-trauma fracture after menopause. Less than one-third of these women were on specific treatment for osteoporosis, and only 40% were ever told they had osteoporosis. Therefore, osteoporotic fractures are common in postmenopausal Australian women, and few, despite their substantially increased risk of further fractures, are on any specific anti-osteoporotic therapy. These data support the need for more effective education for the community and medical practitioners of the clinical significance of osteoporotic fractures and alternatives for treatment.