Objective: The aim of the current study was to evaluate the reliability and comparability of virtual unenhanced (VUE) attenuation values derived from scans of a single-source, dual-energy computed tomography using a split-filter (tbDECT) to a dual-source dual-energy CT (dsDECT). Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, comparisons for tbDECT and dsDECT were made within and between different dual-energy platforms. For the interscanner comparison, 126 patients were scanned with both scanners within a time interval of 224 ± 180 days; for the intrascanner comparison, another 90 patients were scanned twice with the same scanner within a time interval of 136 ± 140 days. Virtual unenhanced images were processed off of venous phase series. Attenuation values of 7 different tissues were recorded. Disagreement for VUE HU measurements greater than 10 HU between 2 scans was defined as inadequate. Results: The interscanner analysis showed significant difference between tbDE and dsDE VUE CT values (P < 0.01) for 6 of 7 organs. Percentage of cases that had more than 10 HU difference between tbDE and dsDE for an individual patient ranged between 15% (left kidney) and 62% (spleen). The intrascanner analysis showed no significant difference between repeat scans for both tbDECT and dsDECT (P > 0.05). However, intrascanner disagreements for the VUE HU measurements greater than 10 HU were recorded in 10% of patients scanned on the tbDECT and 0% of patients scanned on the dsDECT. The organs with the highest portion of greater than 10 HU errors were the liver and the aorta (both 20%). Conclusions: Dual-energy techniques vary in reproducibility of VUE attenuation values. In the current study, tbDECT demonstrated higher variation in VUE HU measurements in comparison to a dsDECT. Virtual unenhanced HU measurements cannot be reliably compared on follow-up CT, if these 2 different dual-energy CT platforms are used.

Profound knowledge in functional and clinical anatomy is a prerequisite for efficient diagnosis in medical practice. However, anatomy teaching does not always consider functional and clinical aspects. Here we introduce a new interprofessional approach to effectively teach the anatomy of the knee joint. The presented teaching approach involves anatomists, orthopaedists and physical therapists to teach anatomy of the knee joint in small groups under functional and clinical aspects. The knee joint courses were implemented during early stages of the medical curriculum and medical students were grouped with students of physical therapy to sensitize students to the importance of interprofessional work. Evaluation results clearly demonstrate that medical students and physical therapy students appreciated this teaching approach. First evaluations of following curricular anatomy exams suggest a benefit of course participants in knee-related multiple choice questions. Together, the interprofessional approach presented here proves to be a suitable approach to teach functional and clinical anatomy of the knee joint and further trains interprofessional work between prospective physicians and physical therapists as a basis for successful healthcare management.

Objectives: This study evaluates the advantages in diagnostic accuracy, confidence, and reading time of additional dual-energy CT-derived reconstructions for assessing acute bowel ischemia. Methods and materials: This retrospective study includes 25 patients with surgically proven acute bowel ischemia and 25 gender- and age-matched controls who underwent biphasic abdominal dual-energy CT. Two fellowship-trained abdominal radiologists and two residents evaluated all cases with and without additional dual-energy CT-derived iodine maps and virtual non-contrast images. Diagnostic confidence was rated on a 10-point Likert scale. Reading time was recorded. The inter-reader agreement was assessed using Fleiss’ kappa. Sensitivity and specificity were compared using McNemar’s test, reader confidence, and reading times with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: For conventional images alone, the inter-reader agreement was moderate (κ = 0.58), with a sensitivity of 77% (95% CI: 67.5–84.8%) and specificity of 90% (95% CI: 82.4–95.1%). Adding dual-energy CT images, inter-reader agreement increased to substantial (κ = 0.69), sensitivity increased significantly to 89% (95% CI: 81.2–94.4%, p = 0.02), while specificity increased non-significantly to 93% (95% CI: 86.1–97.1%, p = 0.51). Diagnostic confidence increased significantly from 8 (IQR: 6–8) to 9 (IQR: 8–9) (p < 0.01). Equivalent diagnostic accuracy and confidence increases were observed for fellowship-trained and resident radiologists. A non-significant increase in mean reading time per case from 196 s to 201 s was observed (p = 0.30). Conclusion: Additional dual-energy CT reconstructions increase diagnostic accuracy and confidence without increasing reading time when evaluating suspected acute bowel ischemia. Both experienced and resident readers benefit from dual-energy CT images. Key Points: Question There are too few clinical studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy CT (DECT) to recommend its use for evaluating suspected acute bowel ischemia. Findings Adding DECT-derived iodine maps and virtual-non-contrast images increase reader sensitivity and confidence while maintaining high specificity when evaluating for acute mesenteric ischemia. Clinical relevance Dual-energy CT should be used to investigate suspected acute bowel ischemia. Both diagnostic accuracy and confidence can be increased independent of reader experience without significantly increasing reading time.