Vitaly I. Igorevich Loginov

Dr. Vitaly I. Igorevich Loginov

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EFElena Filippova
Elena Filippova
MFMarina V. Fridman
Marina V. Fridman
Alexey BurdennyyAlexey Burdennyy
Alexey Burdennyy
VLVitaly I. Igorevich Loginov
Vitaly I. Igorevich Loginov
IPIrina Pronina
Irina Pronina
EBEleonora A. Braga
Eleonora A. Braga
Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been identified as contributors to the development and progression of cancer through various functions and mechanisms. LncRNA GAS5 is downregulated in multiple cancers and acts as a tumor suppressor in breast cancer. GAS5 interacts with various proteins (e.g., E2F1, EZH2, and YAP), DNA (e.g., the insulin receptor promoter), and various microRNAs (miRNAs). In breast cancer, GAS5 binds with miR-21, miR-222, miR-221-3p, miR-196a-5p, and miR-378a-5p that indicates the presence of several elements for miRNA binding (MREs) in GAS5. Mediated by the listed miRNAs, GAS5 is involved in the upregulation of a number of mRNAs of suppressor proteins such as PTEN, PDCD4, DKK2, FOXO1, and SUFU. Furthermore, the aberrant promoter methylation is involved in the regulation of GAS5 gene expression in triple-negative breast cancer and some other carcinomas. GAS5 can stimulate apoptosis in breast cancer via diverse pathways, including cell death receptors and mitochondrial signaling pathways. GAS5 is also a key player in the regulation of some crucial signal pathways in breast cancer, such as PI3K/AKT/mTOR, Wnt/β-catenin, and NF-κB signaling. Through epigenetic and other mechanisms, GAS5 can increase sensitivity to multiple drugs and improve prognosis. GAS5 is thus a promising target in the treatment of breast cancer patients.

1 May 2012 in Epigenetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Alexey DmitrievAlexey Dmitriev
Alexey Dmitriev
VKVladimir I. Kashuba
Vladimir I. Kashuba
KHKlas Haraldson
Klas Haraldson
VSVera N. Senchenko
Vera N. Senchenko
TPTatiana V. Pavlova
Tatiana V. Pavlova
EZEugene Zabarovsky
Eugene Zabarovsky
This study aimed to clarify genetic and epigenetic alterations that occur during lung carcinogenesis and to design perspective sets of newly identified biomarkers. The original method includes chro...

1 March 2017 in Gene
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
IPIrina V. Pronina
Irina V. Pronina
VLVitaly I. Igorevich Loginov
Vitaly I. Igorevich Loginov
Alexey BurdennyyAlexey Burdennyy
Alexey Burdennyy
MFMarina V. Fridman
Marina V. Fridman
VSVera N. Senchenko
Vera N. Senchenko
EBEleonora A. Braga
Eleonora A. Braga

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EBEleonora A. Braga
Eleonora A. Braga
MFMarina V. Fridman
Marina V. Fridman
Alexey BurdennyyAlexey Burdennyy
Alexey Burdennyy
VLVitaly I. Igorevich Loginov
Vitaly I. Igorevich Loginov
Alexey DmitrievAlexey Dmitriev
Alexey Dmitriev
SMSergey G. Morozov
Sergey G. Morozov
Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are crucial players in the pathogenesis of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A competing binding of lncRNAs and mRNAs with microRNAs (miRNAs) is one of the most common mechanisms of gene regulation by lncRNAs in NSCLC, which has been extensively researched in the last two decades. However, alternative mechanisms that do not depend on miRNAs have also been reported. Among them, the most intriguing mechanism is mediated by RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) such as IGF2BP1/2/3, YTHDF1, HuR, and FBL, which increase the stability of target mRNAs. IGF2BP2 and YTHDF1 may also be involved in m6A modification of lncRNAs or target mRNAs. Some lncRNAs, such as DLGAP1-AS2, MALAT1, MNX1-AS1, and SNHG12, are involved in several mechanisms depending on the target: lncRNA/miRNA/mRNA interactome and through RBP. The target protein sets selected here were then analyzed using the DAVID database to identify the pathways overrepresented by KEGG, Wikipathways, and the Reactome pathway. Using the STRING website, we assessed interactions between the target proteins and built networks. Our analysis revealed that the JAK-STAT and Hippo signaling pathways, cytokine pathways, the VEGFA-VEGFR2 pathway, mechanisms of cell cycle regulation, and neovascularization are the most relevant to the effect of lncRNA on NSCLC.

18 February 2015 in Biochemistry (Moscow)
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
VLVitaly I. Igorevich Loginov
Vitaly I. Igorevich Loginov
SRS. V. Rykov
S. V. Rykov
GSGulnara Svishcheva
Gulnara Svishcheva
EBE. A. Braga
E. A. Braga
Interaction between microRNA (miRNA) and messenger RNA of target genes at the posttranscriptional level provides fine-tuned dynamic regulation of cell signaling pathways. Each miRNA can be involved in regulating hundreds of protein-coding genes, and, conversely, a number of different miRNAs usually target a structural gene. Epigenetic gene inactivation associated with methylation of promoter CpG-islands is common to both protein-coding genes and miRNA genes. Here, data on functions of miRNAs in development of tumor-cell phenotype are reviewed. Genomic organization of promoter CpG-islands of the miRNA genes located in inter- and intragenic areas is discussed. The literature and our own results on frequency of CpG-island methylation in miRNA genes from tumors are summarized, and data regarding a link between such modification and changed activity of miRNA genes and, consequently, protein-coding target genes are presented. Moreover, the impact of miRNA gene methylation on key oncogenetic processes as well as affected signaling pathways is discussed.

11 May 2015 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VLVitaly I. Igorevich Loginov
Vitaly I. Igorevich Loginov
Alexey DmitrievAlexey Dmitriev
Alexey Dmitriev
VSVera N. Senchenko
Vera N. Senchenko
IPIrina Pronina
Irina Pronina
DKDmitry S. Khodyrev
Dmitry S. Khodyrev
VKVladimir I. Kashuba
Vladimir I. Kashuba
The SEMA3B gene is located in the 3p21.3 LUCA region, which is frequently affected in different types of cancer. The objective of our study was to expand our knowledge of the SEMA3B gene as a tumor suppressor and the mechanisms of its inactivation. In this study, several experimental approaches were used: tumor growth analyses and apoptosis assays in vitro and in SCID mice, expression and methylation assays and other. With the use of the small cell lung cancer cell line U2020 we confirmed the function of SEMA3B as a tumor suppressor, and showed that the suppression can be realized through the induction of apoptosis and, possibly, associated with the inhibition of angiogenesis. In addition, for the first time, high methylation frequencies have been observed in both intronic (32-39%) and promoter (44-52%) CpG-islands in 38 non-small cell lung carcinomas, including 16 squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) and 22 adenocarcinomas (ADC), and in 83 clear cell renal cell carcinomas (ccRCC). Correlations between the methylation frequencies of the promoter and the intronic CpG-islands of SEMA3B with tumor stage and grade have been revealed for SCC, ADC and ccRCC. The association between the decrease of the SEMA3B mRNA level and hypermethylation of the promoter and the intronic CpG-islands has been estimated in renal primary tumors (P < 0.01). Using qPCR, we observed on the average 10- and 14-fold decrease of the SEMA3B mRNA level in SCC and ADC, respectively, and a 4-fold decrease in ccRCC. The frequency of this effect was high in both lung (92-95%) and renal (84%) tumor samples. Moreover, we showed a clear difference (P < 0.05) of the SEMA3B relative mRNA levels in ADC with and without lymph node metastases. We conclude that aberrant expression and methylation of SEMA3B could be suggested as markers of lung and renal cancer progression.