Alison Moskowitz

Dr. Alison Moskowitz

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2015 in The Lancet Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AMAlison Moskowitz
Alison Moskowitz
HSHeiko Schöder
Heiko Schöder
JYJoachim Yahalom
Joachim Yahalom
SMSusan J McCall
Susan J McCall
SFStephanie Y Fox
Stephanie Y Fox
CMCraig H Moskowitz
Craig H Moskowitz

2 December 2010 in Blood
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AMAlison Moskowitz
Alison Moskowitz
JYJoachim Yahalom
Joachim Yahalom
TKTarun Kewalramani
Tarun Kewalramani
JMJocelyn C. Maragulia
Jocelyn C. Maragulia
JVJill M. Vanak
Jill M. Vanak
CMCraig H. Moskowitz
Craig H. Moskowitz
To identify prognostic factors for patients transplanted for relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma we carried out a combined analysis of patients followed prospectively on 3 consecutive protocols at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. One hundred fifty-three patients with chemosensitive disease after ICE (ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide)–based salvage therapy (ST) proceeded to high-dose chemoradiotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Patients were evaluated with computed tomography and functional imaging (gallium or fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography) prior to ST and again before ASCT. Functional imaging status before ASCT was the only factor significant for event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival by multivariate analysis and clearly identifies poor risk patients (5-year EFS 31% and 75% for FI-positive and negative patients respectively). Administration of involved-field radiotherapy with ASCT was marginally significant for EFS (P = .055). Studies evaluating novel STs, conditioning regimens, post-ASCT maintenance, or allogeneic stem cell transplantation are warranted for patients who fail to normalize pre-ASCT functional imaging.

1 October 2021 in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AMAlison Moskowitz
Alison Moskowitz
GSGunjan Shah
Gunjan Shah
HSHeiko Schöder
Heiko Schöder
NGNivetha Ganesan
Nivetha Ganesan
EDEsther Drill
Esther Drill
CMCraig H. Moskowitz
Craig H. Moskowitz
PURPOSE: We conducted a phase II study evaluating pembrolizumab plus gemcitabine, vinorelbine, and liposomal doxorubicin (pembro-GVD) as second-line therapy for relapsed or refractory (rel/ref) classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03618550 ). METHODS: Transplant eligible patients with rel/ref cHL following first-line therapy were treated with two to four cycles of pembrolizumab (200 mg intravenous [IV], day 1), gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m2 IV, days 1 and 8), vinorelbine (20 mg/m2 IV, days 1 and 8), and liposomal doxorubicin (15 mg/m2, days 1 and 8), given on 21-day cycles. The primary end point was complete response (CR) following up to four cycles of pembro-GVD. Patients who achieved CR by labeled fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (Deauville ≤ 3) after two or four cycles proceeded to high-dose therapy and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HDT/AHCT). HDT/AHCT was carried out according to institutional standards, and brentuximab vedotin maintenance was allowed following HDT/AHCT. RESULTS: Of 39 patients enrolled, 41% had primary ref disease and 38% relapsed within 1 year of frontline treatment. 31 patients received two cycles of pembro-GVD, and eight received four cycles. Most adverse events were grade 1 or two, whereas few were grade 3 and included transaminitis (n = 4), neutropenia (n = 4), mucositis (n = 2), thyroiditis (n = 1), and rash (n = 1). Of 38 evaluable patients, overall and CR rates after pembro-GVD were 100% and 95%, respectively. Thirty-six (95%) patients proceeded to HDT/AHCT, two received pre-HDT/AHCT involved site radiation, and 13 (33%) received post-HDT/AHCT brentuximab vedotin maintenance. All 36 transplanted patients are in remission at a median post-transplant follow-up of 13.5 months (range: 2.66-27.06 months). CONCLUSION: Second-line therapy with pembro-GVD is a highly effective and well-tolerated regimen that can efficiently bridge patients with rel/ref cHL to HDT/AHCT.

30 December 2021 in Blood
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AMAlison Moskowitz
Alison Moskowitz
PGPaola Ghione
Paola Ghione
EJEric Jacobsen
Eric Jacobsen
JRJia Ruan
Jia Ruan
JSJonathan Schatz
Jonathan Schatz
SHSteven M. Horwitz
Steven M. Horwitz
Signaling through JAK1 and/or JAK2 is common among tumor and nontumor cells within peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). No oral therapies are approved for PTCL, and better treatments for relapsed/refractory disease are urgently needed. We conducted a phase 2 study of the JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib for patients with relapsed/refractory PTCL (n = 45) or mycosis fungoides (MF) (n = 7). Patients enrolled onto 1 of 3 biomarker-defined cohorts: (1) activating JAK and/or STAT mutations, (2) ≥30% pSTAT3 expression among tumor cells by immunohistochemistry, or (3) neither or insufficient tissue to assess. Patients received ruxolitinib 20 mg PO twice daily until progression and were assessed for response after cycles 2 and 5 and every 3 cycles thereafter. The primary endpoint was clinical benefit rate (CBR), defined as the combination of complete response, partial response (PR), and stable disease lasting at least 6 months. Only 1 of 7 patients with MF had CBR (ongoing PR > 18 months). CBR among the PTCL cases (n = 45) in cohorts 1, 2, and 3 were 53%, 45%, and 13% (cohorts 1 & 2 vs 3, P = .02), respectively. Eight patients had CBR > 12 months (5 ongoing), including 4 of 5 patients with T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukemia. In an exploratory analysis using multiplex immunofluorescence, expression of phosphorylated S6, a marker of PI3 kinase or mitogen-activated protein kinase activation, in <25% of tumor cells was associated with response to ruxolitinib (P = .05). Our findings indicate that ruxolitinib is active across various PTCL subtypes and support a precision therapy approach to JAK/STAT inhibition in patients with PTCL. This trial was registered at www.clincialtrials.gov as #NCT02974647.

1 February 2013 in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AMAlison Moskowitz
Alison Moskowitz
PHPaul A. Hamlin
Paul A. Hamlin
MPMiguel-Angel Perales
Miguel-Angel Perales
JGJohn Gerecitano
John Gerecitano
SHSteven M. Horwitz
Steven M. Horwitz
CMCraig H. Moskowitz
Craig H. Moskowitz
Purpose: Limited data exist regarding the activity of bendamustine in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). This phase II study evaluated the efficacy of bendamustine in relapsed and refractory HL. Patients and Methods: Patients with relapsed and refractory HL who were ineligible for autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT), or for whom this treatment failed, received bendamustine 120 mg/m2 as a 30-minute infusion on days 1 and 2 every 28 days with growth factor support. The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR). A secondary end point was referral rate to allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (alloSCT) for patients deemed eligible for alloSCT at the time of enrollment. Results: Of the 36 patients enrolled, 34 were evaluable for response. Patients had received a median of four prior treatments, and 75% had relapsed after ASCT. The ORR by intent-to-treat analysis was 53%, including 12 complete responses (33%) and seven partial responses (19%). The response rate among evaluable patients was 56%. Responses were seen in patients with prior refractory disease, prior ASCT, and prior alloSCT; however, no responses were seen in patients who relapsed within 3 months of ASCT. The median response duration was 5 months. Five patients (20% of those eligible) proceeded to alloSCT after treatment with bendamustine. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were infrequent and most commonly included thrombocytopenia (20%), anemia (14%), and infection (14%). Conclusion: This study confirms the efficacy of bendamustine in heavily pretreated patients with HL. These results support current and future studies evaluating bendamustine combinations in relapsed and refractory HL.

1 July 2009 in British Journal of Haematology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AMAlison Moskowitz
Alison Moskowitz
MPMiguel-Angel Perales
Miguel-Angel Perales
TKTarun Kewalramani
Tarun Kewalramani
JYJoachim Yahalom
Joachim Yahalom
HCHugo Castro‐Malaspina
Hugo Castro‐Malaspina
CMCraig H. Moskowitz
Craig H. Moskowitz
Summary: Most patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) are cured with first and second‐line treatment; however, the outcome is unknown for those who fail high dose chemoradiotherapy with autologous stem cell transplant (HDT‐ASCT). This report is an analysis of patients with relapsed and primary refractory HL who were treated with HDT‐ASCT and failed due to progression of disease (POD). Two hundred and two patients received HDT‐ASCT at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center for relapsed or refractory HL between December 1994 and 2005 and 71 failed due to POD. The median survival following HDT‐ASCT failure was 25 months. Only 16 (23%) of the 71 patients are currently alive, nine of whom are in remission. Multivariate analysis revealed two factors associated with poor outcome: relapse within 6 months of HDT‐ASCT and primary refractory disease. The only factor associated with improved survival was the ability to receive a second transplant, in particular, reduced intensity allogeneic transplant (RIT). Novel therapies are needed for patients who fail HDT‐ASCT, particularly those with primary refractory disease and those who relapse within 6 months of HDT‐ASCT. Future studies should focus on prospectively evaluating RIT following HDT‐ASCT failure in patients with remission duration from HDT‐ASCT of >6 months.