Mehmet Emin Tenekeci

Dr. Mehmet Emin Tenekeci

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications

29 March 2021 in Sādhanā
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
İbrahim Berkan Aydilekİbrahim Berkan Aydilek
İbrahim Berkan Aydilek
İKİzzettin Hakan Karaçizmeli
İzzettin Hakan Karaçizmeli
MTMehmet Emin Tenekeci
Mehmet Emin Tenekeci
SKSerkan Kaya
Serkan Kaya
AGAbdülkadir Gümüşçü
Abdülkadir Gümüşçü

31 May 2024 in Multimedia Tools and Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MTMehmet Emin Tenekeci
Mehmet Emin Tenekeci
SASadeq Taha Abdulazeez
Sadeq Taha Abdulazeez
KKKerim KARADAĞ
Kerim KARADAĞ
MMMahmut Modanli
Mahmut Modanli

7 August 2024 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YİYüsra İnci
Yüsra İnci
ABAli Volkan BİLGİLİ
Ali Volkan BİLGİLİ
RGRecep Gündoğan
Recep Gündoğan
GGGafur GÖZÜKARA
Gafur GÖZÜKARA
KKKerim KARADAĞ
Kerim KARADAĞ
MTMehmet Emin Tenekeci
Mehmet Emin Tenekeci
In soil science, the allocation of soil samples to their respective origins holds paramount significance, as it serves as a crucial investigative tool. In recent times, with the increasing use of proximal sensing and advancements in machine-learning techniques, new approaches have accompanied these developments, enhancing the effectiveness of soil utilization in soil science. This study investigates soil classification based on four parent materials. For this purpose, a total of 59 soil samples were collected from 12 profiles and the vicinity of each profile at a depth of 0–30 cm. Surface soil samples were analyzed for elemental concentrations using X-Ray fluorescence (XRF) and inductively coupled plasma–optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) and soil spectra using a visible near-infrared (Vis-NIR) spectrometer. Soil samples collected from soil profiles (12 soil samples) and surface (47 soil samples) were used to classify parent materials using machine learning-based algorithms such as Support Vector Machine (SVM), Ensemble Subspace k-Near Neighbor (ESKNN), and Ensemble Bagged Trees (EBTs). Additionally, as a validation of the classification techniques, the dataset was subjected to five-fold cross-validation and independent sample set splitting (80% calibration and 20% validation). Evaluation metrics such as accuracy, F score, and G mean were used to evaluate prediction performance. Depending on the dataset and algorithm used, the classification success rates varied between 70% and 100%. Overall, the ESKNN (99%) produced better results than other classification methods. Additionally, Relief algorithms were employed to identify key variables for each dataset (ICP-OES: CaO, Fe2O3, Al2O3, MgO, and MnO; XRF: SiO2, CaO, Fe2O3, Al2O, and MnO; Vis-NIR: 567, 571, 572, 573, and 574 nm). Subsequent soil reclassification using these reduced variables revealed reduced accuracies using Vis-NIR data, with ESKNN still yielding the best results.

31 December 2022 in Adıyaman Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NZNechirvan Asaad Zebari̇
Nechirvan Asaad Zebari̇
MTMehmet Emin Tenekeci
Mehmet Emin Tenekeci
The segmentation of skin lesions is crucial to the early and accurate identification of skin cancer by computerized systems. It is difficult to automatically divide skin lesions in dermoscopic images because of challenges such as hairs, gel bubbles, ruler marks, fuzzy boundaries, and low contrast. We proposed an effective method based on K-means and a trainable machine learning system to segment regions of interest (ROI) in skin cancer images. The proposed method was implemented in several stages, including grayscale image conversion, contrast image enhancement, artifact removal with noise reduction, skin lesion segmentation from image using K-means clustering, and ROI segmentation from unwanted objects using a trainable machine learning system. The proposed model has been evaluated using the ISIC 2017 publicly available dataset. The proposed method obtained a 90.09 accuracy rate, outperforming several methods in the literature.

31 December 2024 in Adıyaman Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MTMehmet Turan
Mehmet Turan
MTMehmet Emin Tenekeci
Mehmet Emin Tenekeci
KGKemal Güner
Kemal Güner
The use of GPU in different fields and its successful results initiate efforts to use GPU in database systems. It is also effective in distributed systems and computer networks in that accelerates computational tasks by leveraging parallel processing capabilities across multiple nodes and for tasks that require high computational power, such as network traffic analysis and real-time data processing. Digital transformation in all areas of life has led to the emergence of needs such as increased data diversity and faster data analysis. Upgrading the hardware capacity of the system or software-based studies are possible solutions to analyze this data for meeting the needs. In this study, Apache Spark and GPU performance differences are examined in commonly used SQL queries on big data. In this context, SQL queries such as grouping, sorting, and filtering, which are commonly used in data analysis, are used. While the queries performed with the GPU showed similar results in simple queries compared to the queries performed with Apache Spark, the GPU was completed 3x faster in queries requiring calculation.