Background: Molecular testing for cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules (ITNs) is often reported with incomplete data on clinical assessment and ultrasound malignancy risk (USMR) stratification. This study aimed to clinically validate the diagnostic accuracy of a novel molecular test, assess the incremental preoperative malignancy risk of other clinical factors, and measure the impacts of introducing molecular testing at the population level. Methods: Comprehensive clinical data were collected prospectively for the first 615 consecutive patients with ITNs in a centralized health care system following implementation of a reflexive molecular test. Clinical data include patient history, method of nodule discovery, clinical assessment, USMR, cytology, molecular testing, and surgery or follow-up along with surgeon notes on surgical decision-making. Accuracy of molecular testing and the impact of the introduction of molecular testing were calculated. A multivariable regression model was developed to identify which clinical factors have the most diagnostic significance for ITNs. Results: A locally developed, low-cost molecular test achieved a negative predictive value (NPV) of 76–91% [confidence interval, CI 66–95%] and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 46–65% [CI 37–75%] in ITNs using only residual material from standard liquid cytology fine-needle aspiration (FNA). Sensitivity was highest (80%; [CI 63–92%]) in the American Thyroid Association (ATA) intermediate-suspicion ultrasound category, and lowest (46%; [CI 19–75%]) in the ATA high-suspicion ultrasound category. Following implementation of molecular testing, diagnostic yield increased by 14% ( p = 0.2442) and repeat FNAs decreased by 24% ( p = 0.05). Mutation was the primary reason for surgery in 76% of resected, mutation-positive patients. High-risk mutations were associated with a 58% ( p = 0.0001) shorter wait for surgery. Twenty-six percent of patients with a negative molecular test result underwent surgery. Multivariable regression highlighted molecular testing and USMR as significantly associated with malignancy. Conclusions: Molecular testing improves preoperative risk stratification but requires further stratification for intermediate-risk mutations. Incorporation of clinical factors (especially USMR) with molecular testing may increase the sensitivity for detection of malignancy. Introduction of molecular testing offers some clinical benefits even in a low resection rate setting, and directly influences surgical decision-making. This study illustrates the importance of the local diagnostic pathway in ensuring appropriate integrated use of molecular testing for best outcomes.

The use, safety and effectiveness of crizotinib as part of the management of ROS1-rearranged NSCLC patients in a real-world Canadian clinical cohort was the focus of this retrospective review. Twenty-one ROS1-rearranged patients with advanced/metastatic disease receiving crizotinib between 2014–2020 were identified; crizotinib demonstrated tolerability and effectiveness in this population where outcomes were similar to those described in other crizotinib-treated real-world cohorts, but lower than those of the PROFILE 1001 clinical trial population. Systemic anti-cancer therapy prior to crizotinib initiation occurred in half of the study cohort, with platin-pemetrexed and immune checkpoint inhibitors being most common. Platin-pemetrexed showed good effectiveness in this cohort, but despite high prevalence of upregulated PD-L1 expression, immune checkpoint inhibitors showed poor effectiveness in his cohort. Among all systemic therapies received, crizotinib showed the most effective disease control, although longer intervals between diagnosis and crizotinib initiation were more common among those showing a lack of clinical response to crizotinib, and patients with brain metastases at the time of crizotinib initiation also showed increased diagnosis to crizotinib initiation intervals and decreased clinical response to crizotinib. This study reveals crizotinib has clinical benefit, but timely identification of ROS1-rearrangements and initiation targeted therapies appears important to maximize outcome in this population.

Introduction: The use of osimertinib in the first-line (1L) setting is an effective treatment option for sensitizing EGFR-mutations (EGFRm+) and has significantly altered the standard of care practice for EGFRm+ disease in Canada. Unfortunately, acquired resistance to osimertinib is almost universal, and outcomes are disparate. Post-progression treatment patterns and the outcome of real-world Canadian EGFRm+ patients receiving 1L osimertinib were the focus of this retrospective review. Methods: The Glans-Look Lung Cancer Research database was used to identify and collect demographic, clinical, treatment, and outcome data on EGFRm+ patients who received 1L osimertinib in the Canadian province of Alberta between 2018 and 2022. Results: A total of 150 patients receiving 1L osimertinib were identified. In total, 86 developed progressive disease, with 56 (65%) continuing systemic therapy, 73% continuing osimertinib, and 27% switching to second-line (2L) systemic therapy. Patients were similar both in clinical characteristics at 1L osimertinib initiation and patterns of treatment failure at progression; those continuing 1L osimertinib post-progression had a longer time to progression (13.5 vs. 8.8 months, p = 0.05) and subsequent post-osimertinib initiation survival (34.7 vs. 22.8 months, p = 0.11). Conclusions: The continuation of osimertinib post-progression is an effective disease management strategy for select real-world EGFRm+ patients, providing continued clinical benefit, potentially due to different underlying disease pathogenesis.

Background: Treating depression and anxiety in adolescents can be challenging due to interindividual variability in medication response. With current trial-and-error prescribing practices, adolescents may undergo multiple medication changes over months or years before an effective and tolerated drug and dose are identified. Pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing can identify interindividual differences in drug metabolism, and evidence supporting PGx-guided prescribing in adults with mental disorders is growing. However, its impact on pediatric psychotropic prescribing remains underexplored. Methods: This is a protocol for a parallel-arm, multicentre, randomized controlled trial. Canadian adolescents aged 12–17 years who are initiating or switching a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) for depression and/or an anxiety disorder under physician care are eligible. A total of 452 participants will be randomized 1:1 to PGx-guided SSRI prescribing (experimental) or SSRI prescribing based on current practice guidelines (control). Participants, caregivers, prescribing clinicians, outcome assessors, and investigators will be blinded to treatment allocation. Dual primary outcomes are symptom remission at 12 weeks, measured with the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology–Adolescent (QIDS-A17-SR) and the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders (SCARED). Secondary outcomes, assessed at 4, 8, and 12 weeks, include participant- and physician-rated changes in depressive and anxiety symptoms, role functioning, health-related quality of life, health care utilization, cost-effectiveness, side-effect burden, medication burden, and adherence. Multiple testing will be addressed using the Hochberg method, and a parallel gated analysis will account for non-actionable genotypes. Secondary analysis will estimate minimal clinically important differences for symptom and role-functioning change with PGx-guided therapy. Discussion: At the time of writing, 36 participants have consented and been randomized to an intervention. This trial will evaluate whether PGx-guided prescribing improves symptom remission in adolescents treated with SSRIs. If efficacious, results should be interpreted with existing pediatric pharmacokinetic, observational, and adult trial data to inform PGx use in managing pediatric anxiety and depressive disorders.

The 27th annual Western Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference (WCGCCC) was held in Calgary, Alberta, on 26–27 September 2025. The WCGCCC is an interactive multidisciplinary conference that was attended by healthcare professionals from across Western Canada (British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba) who are involved in the care of patients with colorectal cancer. Specialists from the fields of medical and radiation oncology, pathology, surgery, and a family physician in oncology participated in presentations and discussions for the purpose of developing the recommendations presented here. This consensus statement addresses recent advances in the management of colorectal cancer in a Western Canadian context, with respect to adjuvant exercise, as per the CHALLENGE trial, adjuvant Aspirin and PI3K testing, as per the ALASCCA trial, adjuvant immunotherapy, as per the ATOMIC trial, the use of encorafenib and an EGFR inhibitor with chemotherapy, as per the BREAKWATER trial, the use of combination immunotherapy as per the CHECKMATE 8HW trial and optimal strategies for omitting radiation and non-operative management of non-metastatic rectal cancer.